7122 
6351随着组织双元理论体系的拓展与人力资源管理理论的演进,战略人力资源管理(SHRM)与组织双元的关系逐渐受到学者们的关注。本文从结构观、情境观与动态观三个视角出发,对有关SHRM与组织双元关系的文献进行了梳理和述评,并从人力资本、员工动机、社会网络等方面对这三个视角的研究进行了较为系统的比较,最后在分析现有研究存在的主要问题的基础上,从四个方面提出了SHRM与组织双元关系的未来研究方向。
战略人力资源管理与组织双元的关系研究述评
摘要
参考文献
摘要
关键词
1 Adler P S, Goldoftas B, Levine D I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 1999, 10(1): 43–68
2 Ahammad M F, Lee S M, Malul M, et al. Behavioral ambidexterity:The impact of incentive schemes on productivity,motivation,and performance of employees in commercial banks. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54(S1)
3 Albert D, Kreutzer M, Lechner C. Resolving the paradox of interdependency and strategic renewal in activity systems. Academy of Management Review, 2015, 40(2): 210–234
4 Andriopoulos C, Lewis M W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity:Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 696–717
5 Antons D, Piller F T. Opening the black box of "not invented here":Attitudes,decision biases,and behavioral consequences. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2015, 29(2): 193–217
6 Aust I, Brandl J, Keegan A. State-of-the-art and future directions for HRM from a paradox perspective:Introduction to the Special Issue. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 2015, 29(3-4): 194–213
7 Banks G C, Kepes S. The influence of internal HRM activity fit on the dynamics within the "black box". Human Resource Management Review, 2015, 25(4): 352–367
8 Becker B E, Huselid M A. Strategic human resource management:Where do we go from here?. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(6): 898–925
9 Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation,exploration,and process management:The productivity dilemma revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 238–256
10 Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger T R. Sailing into the wind:Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity,vacillation,and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(6): 587–610
11 Bowen D E, Ostroff C. Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages:The role of the "strength" of the HRM system. The Academy of Management Review, 2004, 29(2): 203–221
12 Burcharth A L D A, Knudsen M P, Søndergaard H A. Neither invented nor shared here:The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 2014, 34(3): 149–161
13 Burgess N, Strauss K, Currie G, et al. Organizational ambidexterity and the hybrid middle manager:The case of patient safety in UK hospitals. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54(S1)
14 Carmeli A, Halevi M Y. How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity:The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 2009, 20(2): 207–218
15 Carter W R. Ambidexterity deconstructed:A hierarchy of capabilities perspective. Management Research Review, 2015, 38(8): 794–812
16 Coradi A, Heinzen M, Boutellier R. A longitudinal study of workspace design for knowledge exploration and exploitation in the research and development process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2015, 24(1): 55–71
17 Delery J E, Doty D H. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management:Tests of universalistic,contingency,and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(4): 802–835
18 Eisenhardt K M, Furr N R, Bingham C B. CROSSROADS-Microfoundations of performance:Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 2010, 21(6): 1263–1273
19 Fang C, Lee J, Schilling M A. Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design:The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2010, 21(3): 625–642
20 Flickinger M, Gruber-Mücke T, Fiedler M. The linkage between human resource practices and organizational ambidex terity:An analysis of internal labor market dynamics in a port-of-entry context. Journal of Business Economics, 2013, 83(8): 923–946
21 Garaus C, Güttel W H, Konlechner S, et al. Bridging knowledge in ambidextrous HRM systems:Empirical evidence from hidden champions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2015, 27(3): 355–381
22 Ghoshal S, Bartlett C A. Linking organizational context and managerial action:The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(S2)
23 Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents,consequences,and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2): 209–226
24 Gupta A K, Smit K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 693–706
25 Hauff S, Alewell D, Hansen N K. HRM systems between control and commitment:Occurrence,characteristics and effects on HRM outcomes and firm performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 2014, 24(4): 424–441
26 He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481–493
27 Heavey C, Simsek Z, Fox B C. Managerial social networks and ambidexterity of SMEs:The moderating role of a proactive commitment to innovation. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54(S1)
28 Holmqvist M, Spicer A. The ambidextrous employee:Exploiting and exploring people's potential. Emerald Group Publishing Limited,, 2012
29 Huang J, Kim H J. Conceptualizing structural ambidexterity into the innovation of human resource management architecture:The case of LG Electronics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2013, 24(5): 922–943
30 Jasmand C, Blazevic V, de Ruyter K. Generating sales while providing service:A study of customer service representatives' ambidextrous behavior. Journal of Marketing, 2012, 76(1): 20–37
31 Kang S C, Morris S S, Snell S A. Relational archetypes,organizational learning,and value creation:Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 236–256
32 Kang S C, Snell S A. Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning:A framework for human resource ma-nagement. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(1): 65–92
33 Kang S C, Snell S A, Swart J. Options-based HRM,intellectual capital,and exploratory and exploitative learning in law firms' practice groups. Human Resource Management, 2012, 51(4): 461–485
34 Katou A A, Budhwar P S, Patel C. Content vs. process in the HRM-performance relationship:An empirical examination. Human Resource Management, 2014, 53(4): 527–544
35 Katz R, Allen T J. Investigating the not invented here(NIH) syndrome:A look at the performance,tenure,and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 1982, 12(1): 7–20
36 Kauppila O P. Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization, 2010, 8(4): 283–312
37 Keegan A, Huemann M, Turner J R. Beyond the line:Exploring the HRM responsibilities of line managers,project ma-nagers and the HRM department in four project-oriented companies in the Netherlands,Austria,the UK and the USA. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23(15): 3085–3104
38 Kehoe R R, Collins C J. Exploration and exploitation business strategies and the contingent fit of alternative HR systems. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2008
39 Kostopoulos K C, Bozionelos N. Team exploratory and exploitative learning:Psychological safety,task conflict,and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 2011, 36(3): 385–415
40 Kostopoulos K C, Bozionelos N, Syrigos E. Ambidexterity and unit performance:Intellectual capital antecedents and cross-level moderating effects of human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54(S1)
41 Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman M L. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 2010, 4(1): 109–155
42 Lewis M W. Exploring paradox:Toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(4): 760–776
43 Lewis M W, Smith W K. Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective:Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2014, 50(2): 127–149
44 Lichtenthaler U, Ernst H, Hoegl M. Not-sold-here:How attitudes influence external knowledge exploitation. Organization Science, 2010, 21(5): 1054–1071
45 Luger J, Raisch S, Schimmer M. The paradox of static and dynamic ambidexterity. Academy of Management:Procee-dings, 2013 : 11466
46 Medcof J W, Song L J. Exploration,exploitation and human resource management practices in cooperative and entrepreneurial HR configurations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2013, 24(15): 2911–2926
47 Minbaeva D B. Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance. Human Resource Management Review, 2013, 23(4): 378–390
48 Mom T J M, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Explaining variation in managers' ambidexterity:Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 812–828
49 Mom T J M, Fourné S P L, Jansen J J P. Managers' work experience,ambidexterity,and performance:The contingency role of the work context. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54(S1)
50 Mueller V, Rosenbusch N, Bausch A. Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation:A meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(6): 1606–1636
51 Papachroni A, Heracleous L, Paroutis S. Organizational ambidexterity through the lens of paradox theory:Building a novel research agenda. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2015, 51(1): 71–93
52 Patel P C, Messersmith J G, Lepak D P. Walking the tightrope:An assessment of the relationship between high perfor-mance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(5): 1420–1442
53 Prieto I M, Santana M P P. Building ambidexterity:The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 2012, 51(2): 189–212
54 Prieto-Pastor I, Martin-Perez V. Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2015, 26(5): 589–615
55 Rogan M, Mors M L. A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organization Science, 2014, 25(6): 1860–1877
56 Smith W K, Lewis M W. Toward a theory of paradox:A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. The Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(2): 381–403
57 Sok K M, Sok P, De Luca L M. The effect of "can do" and "reason to" motivations on service-sales ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015
58 Swart J, Kinnie N. Reconsidering boundaries:Human resource management in a networked world. Human Resource Management, 2014, 53(2): 291–310
59 Swart J, Kinnie N, van Rossenberg Y, et al. Why should I share my knowledge? A multiple foci of commitment perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 2014, 24(3): 269–289
60 Taylor A, Helfat C E. Organizational linkages for surviving technological change:Complementary assets,middle management,and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 718–739
61 Tushman M L, O'Reilly C A. Ambidextrous organizations:Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 1996, 38(4): 8–30
62 Vande Voorde F CHRM,employee well-being and organizational performance:A balanced perspectiveRidderkerk:Ridderprint2010
63 Wright P M, McMahan G C. Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 1992, 18(2): 295–320
64 Zhou Y, Hong Y, Liu J. Internal commitment or external collaboration? The impact of human resource management systems on firm innovation and performance. Human Resource Management, 2013, 52(2): 263–288
引用本文
王朝晖. 战略人力资源管理与组织双元的关系研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016, 38(3): 44–60.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：品牌推崇研究述评
