Literature Review on the Influence of Information Disclosure on M&As Based on Meta-analysis

Chen Wenting; Shi Yihua; Yu Pengyi

doi:doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200801.203

Home > All Issues > 2020 > No.12 > Article Details

Literature Review on the Influence of Information Disclosure on M&As Based on Meta-analysis

Chen Wenting, Shi Yihua, Yu Pengyi Correspondence author

Author Affiliations

Full Article | PDF Article(1236.2 KB) View

9806

4921

Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 12, pp. 30 - 43 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200801.203

First published at:Dec 20, 2020

Summary

References

Summary

Based on the limitations of existing studies, this paper examines the relationship between information disclosure and M&As and the impact of potential moderating variables from the aspects of capital market valuation efficiency and M&A performance. Meta-analysis is used to summarize and analyze 59 effect values extracted from 59 empirical literatures. The results show that:（1）Information disclosure can effectively improve the efficiency of capital market valuation. Specifically, information disclosure can reduce the synchronization of stock prices, enhance market liquidity, and reduce the cost of capital.（2）Information disclosure can also improve M&A performance.（3）The relationship between information disclosure and M&As is also affected by enterprise size, analyst tracking and measurement dimensions.

The contributions of this paper are as follows: Firstly, the existing research results on information disclosure and M&As have significant differences in the correlation direction and strength degree, the influence of situational factors and measuring factors on the relationship between the two is also unclear. This study uses Meta-analysis to examine the relationship between information disclosure and M&As, as well as the impact of the moderating factors of analyst tracking, enterprise size, and measurement dimensions. Meta-analysis can integrate the scattered research results between information disclosure and M&As, which not only overcomes the limitations of the applicability of individual research conclusions, but also clarifies the reasons for the differences in previous studies. Secondly, existing studies focus on the impact of information disclosure on market value and resource allocation efficiency, that is, they mainly focus on the post-merger performance, and less attention has been paid on the impact of information disclosure on different stages in the process of M&As. This study distinguishes corporate mergers and reorganizations into pre-merger valuation efficiency and post-merger performance, thus enriching and developing the analysis framework of the influence of information disclosure on M&As in finance and information economics. Thirdly, this study reveals the impact of information disclosure on the efficiency of M&As, which is conducive to improving the effective allocation of resources in the control rights. The conclusions of this study provide empirical evidence and policy implication for protecting the interests of small and medium-sized investors, improving the regulatory mechanism of information disclosure of M&As in the new era, and promoting the healthy and sustainable development of the capital market. Future research can strengthen the analysis of the fields with less literature at present, such as the moderating effect of institutional environment, institutional investor ownership, political connections and other factors, and further explore the mechanism of information disclosure affecting M&As.

Keywords

information disclosure; M&As; Meta-analysis

[1] Chen Zeyi, Li Changqing, Wei Zhihua. Does negative coverage affect the success or termination of M&A: Evidence from material assets reorganization[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017, 20(01): 96-107.

[2] Hu Jun, Wang Zhen. Weibo, firm-specific information disclosure and stock price synchronicity[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2015, (11): 190-206.

[3] Hu Yuanmu, Tan Youchao. The nonfinancial information disclosure: Literature review and future research Prospects[J]. Accounting Research, 2013, (03): 20-26.

[4] Li Weian, Hao Chen, Cui Guangyao, Zheng Minna, Meng Qiankun. Forty years of corporate governance research: A review and agenda[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(12): 161-185.

[5] Lu Chao, Dai Jingwen. Liu Sijing. Media, securities analyst, and stock price synchronicity[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 17(03): 82-92.

[6] Peng Yuchao, Gu Leilei. Meta-regression analysis in economics[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2014, (2): 126-131.

[7] Wand Fuming, Dong Zhengying. Meta-analysis of the effect of financial support policies on entrepreneurship[J]. R&D Management, 2018, 30(03): 133-144.

[8] Xiao Qi, Qu Wenzhou. A literature review of investor attention, asset pricing and stock return synchronicity[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, 39(11): 120-137.

[9] Xu Jing, Ge Rui, Han Hui. The impact of information dissemination through we media on the capital market reaction to the disclosure of internal control deficiencies [J]. Auditing Research, 2018, (05): 113-120.

[10] Zhang Ran, Wang Huijuan, Xu Chao. Management's and auditors' report on internal control and cost of capital: Evidence from China A-share firms[J]. Auditing Research, 2012, (01): 96-102.

[11] Zhang Yi, Fan Yun, Zhao Jing. Review and introduction of meta-analysis in foreign management studies[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2009, 31(07): 1-8.

[12] Blankespoor E, Miller B P, White H D. Initial evidence on the market impact of the XBRL Mandate[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2014, 19(4): 1468-1503.

[13] Bloomfield R J, Wilks T J. Disclosure effects in the laboratory: Liquidity, depth, and the cost of capital[J]. The Accounting Review,2000, 75(1): 13-41.

[14] Erickson M, Wang S W, Zhang X F. The change in information uncertainty and acquirer wealth losses[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2012, 17(4): 913-943.

[15] Ferreira M A, Laux P A. Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow[J]. The Journal of Finance,2007, 62(2): 951-989.

[16] Hermalin B E, Weisbach M S. Information disclosure and corporate governance[J]. The Journal of Finance,2012, 67(1): 195-233.

[17] Kim E H, Youm Y N. How do social media affect analyst stock recommendations? Evidence from S&P 500 electric power companies’ Twitter accounts[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2017, 38(13): 2599-2622.

[18] Miller G S, Skinner D J. The evolving disclosure landscape: How changes in technology, the media, and capital markets are affecting disclosure[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2015, 53(2): 221-239.

[19] Porter C E, Donthu N, MacElroy W H, et al. How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities[J]. California Management Review,2011, 53(4): 80-110.

[20] Wang Y, Lahr H. Takeover law to protect shareholders: Increasing efficiency or merely redistributing gains?[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2017, 43: 288-315.

Cite this article

Chen Wenting, Shi Yihua, Yu Pengyi. Literature Review on the Influence of Information Disclosure on M&As Based on Meta-analysis[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(12): 30-43.