The United States is a big country and the most important member in the camp of developed countries. Studying the historical development experience of the United States as a late-developing country that eventually surpassed the rise of Britain as a superpower can provide a reference for China’s own development. Chinese scholars often refer to this kind of research as " crossing the river by feeling for ‘America’”. And when we explore the direction of China’s economic development, this method can also be used. Chinese economics is a big country’s economics, which can draw the experience and lessons of theoretical development from the history of American economics, which is also a big country’s economics. This paper finds that from the 19th century to the present, the three sets of economic theory systems, such as the American School, the American Institutional School and Neoclassical Economics, have dominated the US economic research and economic policy planning in turn. By matching the stage characteristics of American economics and economic thoughts with the staged periods of China’s economic existence, we can find the future development direction of China’s economic theory, and remind scholars to carry out relevant research in advance. By combing the " American experience”of the development of economic theories, we explore the construction and future development of Chinese economics, and get some conclusions and inspirations: （1）If the national economy is at a different stage of development, the research objects and objectives of economics should be adjusted accordingly. Economic theories which cannot adapt to changes in the stage of national development will inevitably lose their mainstream status, thereby being marginalized and eventually withdrawing from the historical arena.（2）Neoclassical Economics is the economic theory adopted by the United States in the superpower stage. The reason why it can eliminate the American School and the American Institutional School is that Neoclassical Economics attaches great importance to the international economy.（3）The Chinese economy should pay attention to the construction of a theoretical system of international economics with Chinese characteristics. At the same time, it should start the accumulation of relevant theoretical materials and the exploration and research of theoretical foundations as soon as possible, in order to better serve the needs of building a socialist modernization country. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: （1）The evolution of American economic thoughts since 1815 is sorted out and divided into three stages, and the relationship between economic thoughts and economic reality is explained, which provides a relatively complete picture for understanding the evolution of American mainstream economic thoughts.（2）From the perspectives of the development stage of the great powers, the sources of competitiveness of the Neoclassical Economic Theory, and the defects of the Comparative Advantage Theory, we argue that the construction of China’s economic theory can draw lessons from American economic thoughts and their evolution process, and perfect its own theoretical system and content construction.
The Evolution of American Economic Thoughts and Its Enlightenment to Chinese Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 45, Issue 07, pp. 17 - 30 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.07.002
 Chen E F, He G Q. On the academic principles of promoting the modernization of Chinese economics: An analysis of the relationship between Marxist economics, western economics, and Chinese economics[J]. Studies on Marxism, 2009, (4): 5-16. (In Chinese)
 Chen E F, Wu S L. Western institutional economics: Tradition and modern theory[J]. The Study of Finance and Economics, 1998, (4): 41-44. (In Chinese)
 Jia G L. American School of political economy and economic logic of powerful countries[J]. China Review of Political Economy, 2010, (3): 101-113. (In Chinese)
 Jia G L. The American School: The national economic theory that fostered the economic rise of the United States[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2011, (4): 111-125. (In Chinese)
 Jia G L, Shu K D. American School in 19th century: The school forgotten by history of economic thought[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2008, (9): 5-11. (In Chinese)
 Jia G L, Yang W. A new understanding of the productive role of capital: A commentary to the economic development theory of the second-generation American School[J]. China Review of Political Economy, 2013, 4(1): 96-105. (In Chinese)
 Jian X H. Innovation and development of political economy in Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: A discussion with professor Hong Yongmiao[J]. Studies on Marxism, 2018, (3): 5-19. (In Chinese)
 Pang J J. The direction and methods of Chinese economy[J]. China Review of Political Economy, 2012, (4): 3-17. (In Chinese)
 Pang J J. Three important issues in the construction and development of the political economy of socialism with Chinese characteristics[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, (11): 4-16. (In Chinese)
 Pei C H. The outline of theoretical research on Kaifangxing Economy with Chinese characteristics[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, (4): 14-29. (In Chinese)
 Ren B P. Sixty years of new China economics: Evolutionary logic, development tracks and future trends[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2009, (3): 16-19. (In Chinese)
 Zhang L. The diversified development of Marxist economics, unorthodox economics and Chinese Economics[J]. Social Science Journal, 2016, (4): 15-20. (In Chinese)
 Zhou W, Feng W T. Chinese miracles and national construction: A summary of China’s forty years of reform and opening-up[J]. Social Science Front, 2018, (5): 27-36. (In Chinese)
 Zhou W, Sun Y. The trend of economic development and the new construction of China’s economics[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2014, (11): 41-46. (In Chinese)
 Hodgson G M. The approach of institutional economics[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, 36(1): 166-192.
 Neill C P. Daniel Raymond, an early chapter in the history of economic theory in the United States[M]. New York: Johnson Reprint Corp, 1973: 44-45.
 Phillips W. Manual of political economy, with particular reference to the institutions, resources, and conditions of the United States[M]. Charleston: Nabu Press, 2010: 196.
 Rae J. The sociological theory of capital: Being a complete reprint of the new principles of political economy, 1834[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1905: 151-152.
 Yonay Y P. The struggle over the soul of economics: Institutionalist and neoclassical economists in America between the wars[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998: 75-76.
 Zhang L, Xu Y L. The influence of institutionalists on the new deal: And why the mainstream literature of the history of economic thought ignores this period in history[J]. World Review of Political Economy, 2011, 2(1): 90-104.
Cite this article
Zhou Wen, Feng Wentao. The Evolution of American Economic Thoughts and Its Enlightenment to Chinese Economics[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 45(7): 17-30.
Previous: Does Spatial Correlation of Producer Services Promote the Cross-regional Investment of Manufacturing Firms?