Since 2008, the Global Financial Crisis has had a huge impact on China’s export-oriented economy. The State Council in 2008 launched an economic stimulus plan known as " Four-Trillion Investment” （70.50% of the total package, i.e. 2.82 trillion RMB, was financed by local governments）. Since then, the scale of local government debt has increased significantly, which has produced some unexpected economic consequences for the allocation of credit resources and even economic development. The revenue and cost of government borrowing are the core concerns of many countries. The impact of government borrowing on the investment and financing of firms has been studied in the existing literature. Due to the great differences in the development of legal system and financial market, the micro consequences of government borrowing are also inconsistent, i.e. there is a dispute between the " crowding-out effect” and the " crowding-in effect” in the economic theory. Therefore, does local government debt affect the debt of local firms? If so, how does the affection occur? These are real problems worth studying. Based on the data of 266 cities in China, this paper tests the impact of the local government debt scale on local firms’ debt level and debt cost in 2008−2017. The results show that: First, the scale of local government debt decreases firm leverage. Specifically, the scale of local government debt decreases firm leverage by reducing the short-term debt and operating debt scale. Compared with state-owned, non-infrastructure and public welfare industries, and profitable companies, the scale of local government debt has a stronger negative effect on the firm leverage of non-state-owned, infrastructure and public welfare industries, and loss-making companies. Second, the scale of local government debt increases the debt cost of non-state-owned companies. The results show that the expansion of the local government debt scale has a crowding-out effect on firm leverage through the demand competition mechanism, and increases firms’ debt cost through the price mechanism. This paper contributes to the literature as follows: First, it not only tests the effect of local government debt on firm leverage, but also analyzes the way of local government debt affecting firm leverage. The results are helpful to enrich the literature of the impact of local government fiscal policies on micro enterprises. Second, different from the measurement of using federal or central government general debt, we measure the scale of local government debt based on city-level data, which is not only helpful to analyze the effect of government debt on firm behavior under the same institutional background, but also helpful to reduce the dependence on the time series model, make the data structure more matching, and make the research conclusion more robust. Third, we test the effect of government debt on firm leverage and debt cost from the perspective of the demand competition mechanism and price mechanism, which helps to reveal the causes of " difficult and costly in financing” reflected by firms, and provide some decision reference for the central government in controlling the scale of local government debt, optimizing the allocation of credit capital, improving the financing ability of firms, and promoting economic development.
The Effect of Local Government Debt on Firm Leverage：Empirical Evidence from the City-level of China
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 46, Issue 01, pp. 111 - 125 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.01.008
Chen H, Yang Q. A study on the relationship between government debt and private investment: A comparison between OECD countries and China[J]. Studies of International Finance, 2017, (12): 17-24. (In Chinese)
Chen J, Li J F. Financial decentralization, promotion incentive and local governments’ debt financing activities: Empirical evidence from the perspective of urban construction investment bonds[J]. Accounting Research, 2015, (01): 61-67, 97. (In Chinese)
Fan X Y, Fang C, He Q. Who is pushing up the corporate debt cost: An inspection of the government debt “portfolio effect”[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2017, (1): 51-65. (In Chinese)
Gong Q, Wang J, Jia Y. A survey of research on local government debts and fiscal decentralization[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2011, (7): 144-156. (In Chinese)
Guo Y Q, He Y, Li L. Bailout expectation, common pool incentive and governance of China’s local government debt financing[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, (3): 81-95. (In Chinese)
Hu Y C, Zhang W J. Local government debt expansion and bank credit risk[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2012, (3): 59-65. (In Chinese)
Huang L Q, Qu Y H. Study on the difference between operating liabilities leverage and financing liabilities leverage[J]. Accounting Research, 2010, (9): 59-65, 97. (In Chinese)
Li G Z, Liu L. Debt financing cost and private credit discrimination[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2009, (12): 137-150. (In Chinese)
Luo D L, She G M. Official’s turnover and issuance of local government debt[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, (6): 131-146. (In Chinese)
Wei Z H, Wang Z J, Wu Y H, Li C Q. Financial ecological environment, audit opinion and the cost of debt financing[J]. Auditing Research, 2012, (3): 98-105. (In Chinese)
Wu H P, Liu L. Crowding-out or crowding-in: The impact of public investment on private investment[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2007, (2): 13-22. (In Chinese)
Zhong H Y, Zhong N H, Zhu X N. Are the urban construction investment bonds’ guarantees credible? Evidence from credit ratings and bond pricings[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, (4): 66-82. (In Chinese)
Zhong N H, Liu Z K, He J X, Su C L. The structural problem of China’s non-financial corporate debt[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, (7): 102-117. (In Chinese)
Zhu C H, Yang Z, Cheng C. Local government debt and corporate innovation: An empirical study based on provincial panel data and No.43 Document of the State Council[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2018, (8): 77-89. (In Chinese)
Akomolafe K J, Bosede O, Emmanuel O, et al. Public debt and private investment in Nigeria[J]. American Journal of Economics, 2015, 5(5): 501-507.
Badoer D C, James C M. The determinants of long-term corporate debt issuances[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2016, 71(1): 457-492. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12264
Bai C E, Hsieh C T, Song Z M. The long shadow of a fiscal expansion[R]. NBER Working Paper No.w22801, 2016.
Chen Z, He Z G, Liu C. The financing of local government in China: Stimulus loan wanes and shadow banking waxes[R]. NBER Working Papers 23598, 2017.
Chikore R, Gachira W. Crowding in and crowding out effects of debt financed and tax financed public expenditure on private investment in Zimbabwe[J]. International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 2012, 3(8): 1180-1189.
Chui A C W, Kwok C C Y, Zhou G S. National culture and the cost of debt[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2016, 69: 1-19.
Cong L W, Gao H Y, Ponticelli J, et al. Credit allocation under economic stimulus: Evidence from China[R]. Buffett Institute Global Poverty Research Lab Working Paper No.17-108, 2018.
Demirci I, Huang J, Sialm C. Government debt and corporate leverage: International evidence[R]. NBER Working Papers 23310, 2017.
Deng Y H, Morck R, Wu J, et al. China’s pseudo-monetary policy[J]. Review of Finance, 2015, 19(1): 55-93. DOI:10.1093/rof/rfu026
Eden M, Kraay A. “Crowding in” and the returns to government investment in low-income countries[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.6781, 2014. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2398151
Fan J P H, Titman S, Twite G. An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2012, 47(1): 23-56. DOI:10.1017/S0022109011000597
Graham J R, Leary M T, Roberts M R. A century of capital structure: The leveraging of corporate America[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 118(3): 658-683. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.08.005
Greenwood R, Hanson S, Stein J C. A gap-filling theory of corporate debt maturity choice[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(3): 993-1028. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01559.x
Huang Y S. Central-local relations in China during the reform era: The economic and institutional dimensions[J]. World Development, 1996, 24(4): 655-672. DOI:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00160-E
Krishnamurthy A, Vissing-Jorgensen A. The aggregate demand for treasury debt[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2012, 120(2): 233-267. DOI:10.1086/666526
Traum N, Yang S C S. When does government debt crowd out investment?[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2015, 30(1): 24-45. DOI:10.1002/jae.2356
Cite this article
Wang Jinxiang, Wu Shinong, Wu Yuhui. The Effect of Local Government Debt on Firm Leverage：Empirical Evidence from the City-level of China[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020, 46(1): 111-125.
Previous: The Power Game and the Motivation of the Equity Incentive Design in the Change of Control Rights：Based on the Case Study of Shanghai Jahwa