文章以中国制造业上市公司为研究对象,考察了外部审计鉴证是否可以替代内部关系治理来提升供应商关系的价值创造效应。研究发现,紧密的供应商关系显著提升了公司的价值,同时也降低了企业对高质量审计鉴证服务的需求,但这种需求的降低并没有弱化供应商关系对公司价值的提升作用,说明内部关系治理与高质量审计鉴证服务存在替代效应。同时,随着外部制度环境的改善,上述替代效应会减弱。文章为理解外部审计鉴证与以关系治理为主要特征的转型经济社会中的关系网络如何联合影响公司价值创造提供了更为直接的经验证据,从外部审计鉴证的视角进一步丰富和拓展了关系型交易影响公司价值的研究文献。
供应商关系的公司价值鉴证效应
摘要
参考文献
1 陈运森, 王玉涛.审计质量、交易成本与商业信用模式[J].审计研究, 2010, (6):77-85.
2 杜兴强, 周泽将, 杜颖洁.政治联系、审计师选择的"地缘"偏好与审计意见——基于国有上市公司的经验证据[J].审计研究, 2011, (2):77-86.
3 樊纲, 王小鲁, 朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程报告2011年报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社, 2011.
4 林钟高, 郑军, 彭琳, 等.关系型交易、事务所选聘与审计契约稳定性——基于主要供应商/客户视角的经验证据[J].中国会计评论, 2014, (3):419-452.
5 刘峰, 周福源.国际四大意味着高审计质量吗?——基于会计稳健性角度的检验[J].会计研究, 2007, (3):79-87.
6 唐跃军.供应商、经销商议价能力与公司业绩——来自2005-2007年中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].中国工业经济, 2009, (10):67-76.
7 王少飞, 周国良, 何小杨, 等.关系型投资与审计行为[J].财经研究, 2010, (5):16-26.
8 王彦超, 林斌, 辛清泉.市场环境、民事诉讼与盈余管理[J].中国会计评论, 2008, (1):21-40.
9 郑军, 林钟高, 彭琳.法制环境、关系网络与交易成本——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财经研究, 2013, (6):51-62.
10 Baimant S, Rajan M. The role of information and opportunism on the choice of buyer-seller relationship[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2002, 40(2):247-278.
11 Ball R, Kothari S P, Robin A. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000, 29(1):1-51.
12 Banerjee S, Dasgupta S, Kim Y. Buyer-supplier relationships and the stakeholder theory of capital structure[J]. Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(5):2507-2552.
13 Dou Y, Ole-Kristian H, Thomas W. Relationship-specificity, contract enforceability, and income smoothing:An international study[J]. Accounting Review, 2013, 88(5):1629-1656.
14 Fan J, Wong T J. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2005, 43(1):35-72.
15 Grham J R, Harvey C R, Rajgopal S. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 40(1-3):3-73.
16 Jap S D, Anderson E. Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships:Movement across stages and performance[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(2):260-275.
17 Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm:Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4):305-360.
18 Johnson S, McMillan J, Woodruff C. Contract enforcement in transition[R]. CESifo Working Paper, 1999.
19 Johnstone K M, Li C, Luo S. Client-auditor supply chain relationships, audit quality, and audit pricing[J]. Auditing:A Journal of Practice&Theory, 2014, 33(4):119-166.
20 Kalwani M U, Narayandas N. Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships:Do they pay off for supplier firms?[J], Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(1):1-16.
21 Kong X. Why are social network transactions important? Evidence based on the concentration of key suppliers and customers in China[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2011, 4(3):121-133.
22 Li J S. Relation-based versus rule-based governance:An explanation of the East Asian miracle and Asian crisis[J]. Review of International Economics, 2003, 11(4):651-673.
23 Park S H, Luo Y. Guanxi and organizational dynamics:Organizational networking in Chinese firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(5):455-477.
24 Raman K, Shahrur H. Relationship-specific investments and earnings management:Evidence on corporate suppliers and customers[J]. Accounting Review, 2008, 84(4):1041-1081.
25 Wang Q, Wong T J, Xia L. State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice:Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 2008, 46(1):112-134.
26 Williamson O E. The economic institutions of capitalism[M]. New York:Free Press, 1985.
27 Yao Y. Relationship-specific investment, accounting conservatism, auditor choice and audit fees:The effect of customers and suppliers[D]. PhD Thesis, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2008.
引用本文
郑军, 林钟高, 徐德信, 等. 供应商关系的公司价值鉴证效应[J]. 财经研究, 2016, 42(6): 121–132.
导出参考文献,格式为:
上一篇:宗教信仰、政治身份与企业投资偏好
本期封面
相关论文