In recent years, with industrial transfer and structural change in labor force, farmers’ entrepreneurial consciousness and ability have been strengthened. Meanwhile, under the national strategies such as " mass entrepreneurship and innovation” and " targeted poverty alleviation”, governments promulgated a series of policies to support rural entrepreneurship, which have greatly stimulated farmers’ entrepreneurial enthusiasm. Rural entrepreneurship can expand the space for rural labor employment, add creativity for the development of county economy, accelerate the process of " new countryside” construction, and explore new pace for a coordinated development of both urban and rural places. Therefore, there is of great social and economic significance to deep study of rural entrepreneurship. Compared with urban entrepreneurship, Chinese rural entrepreneurs are influenced by traditional ancestral culture, family culture and collectivism culture, and renqing relationship between friends and relatives, which is based on blood ties and geographical ties, plays an important role in social relationship of farmer entrepreneurs. Besides, rural entrepreneurship is limited by the shortage of human resources in rural areas and imperfect human capital market, thus rural entrepreneurs pay more attention to friends and relatives’ relationship. Based on this view, we want to know how renqing relationship influences the performance of rural entrepreneurial firms. In general, rural entrepreneurship takes family as the basic unit, and is self-organized, showing small, individual and decentralized characteristics of " small scale peasant economy”. Therefore, technical knowledge and normative habits learnt by entrepreneurs from previous experience are also important to rural entrepreneurship, because these knowledge and habits are embedded in their behaviors and ability, and then are delivered to entrepreneurial enterprises increasingly. To some extent, this normalized experience can also overcome the drawbacks of traditional " small scale peasant economy”, and improve the normative development of rural entrepreneurial firms. However, when " normalized experience” meets renqing relationship, what kind of " sparks” will happen? Mutual promotion or restriction? Based on 4600 nation-wide rural firm samples which were collected through the 2016 Thousand Villages Investigation implemented by Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, we try to figure out: (1)what would be the impact of renqing relationship on the performance of rural entrepreneurial firms in China? does renqing relationship have different influences on firms’ survival performance, growth performance, and innovation performance? (2)what would be the impact of entrepreneurs’ normalized experience on the performance of rural entrepreneurial firms in China? (3)what would be the impact of normalized experience on the relationship between renqing relationship and firm performance? are they mutually promoted or restricted? It comes to the following conclusions: firstly, influenced by traditional rural ancestral culture and family culture, renqing relationship plays an important role in rural entrepreneurship. Specifically speaking, renqing relationship can promote the survival and innovation performance of rural entrepreneurial firms significantly. Secondly, entrepreneurs’ normalized experience in firm management and industrial associations has positive influence on the performance of rural entrepreneurial firms. Thirdly, the entrepreneurs’ previous normalized experience weakens the role of renqing relationship in promoting the performance of rural entrepreneurial firms, that is, there is a kind of inhibition between previous normalized experience and renqing relationship. The robustness test also confirms these conclusions. In short, this paper mainly expands the existing research in the following three aspects. First, this paper enriches the existing literature on the factors influencing the performance of rural entrepreneurial firms, and studies the impact of renqing relationship on rural entrepreneurial firms’ performance under the cultural background of Chinese rural areas. Second, this paper uses a comprehensive and objective measurement to measure rural entrepreneurial firms’ performance(survival performance, growth performance and innovation performance). Third, this paper analyzes the interaction between " normalized” experience of entrepreneurs and Chinese traditional culture(ancestral culture and family culture). This paper has great contributions to rural entrepreneurship research and practice. It also provides valuable suggestions on how to improve rural entrepreneurship and strengthen the governance of rural entrepreneurial firms from the perspective of the balance between internal relations and the shock of external experience in rural areas.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Investigation of Performance of Rural Entrepreneurial Firms in China: Influence and Interaction between Renqing Relationship and Normative Experience
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 01, pp. 20 - 32 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.01.002
Summary
References
Summary
[1]Chen W Z, Ren H. Comparison between renqing guanxi and social exchange relationship and exploration of their management strategies: Based on the perspective of Chinese and western culture[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2015, (6): 789-798. (In Chinese)
[2]Chen W T, Wang J M. Renqing or rules? The relationship between entrepreneur’s social ties and innovation performance under different industrial environment[J]. Economic Management, 2015, (9): 155-165. (In Chinese)
[3]Guo C, He A H. Social capital, entrepreneurial environment and peasants’ entrepreneurial performance in agriculture-related business[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2017, (2): 76-85. (In Chinese)
[4]Guo H D, Ding G J. Relational network, opportunity innovation and performance of rural entrepreneurship[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2013, (8): 78-87. (In Chinese)
[5]Guo Y N, Yao Y, Jeremy F. The lineage networks and the income distribution in villages[J]. Management World, 2014, (1): 73-89. (In Chinese)
[6]Jiang J Y, Qian W R, Guo H D. Social network, prior experience and farmer entrepreneurial decision[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2014, (2): 17-25. (In Chinese)
[7]Jin D, Jiang J Y. Research on the mechanism of peasant entrepreneurship based on social embedding theory[J]. Management World, 2014, (12): 180-181. (In Chinese)
[8]Luo M Z, Chen M. Personality trait, entrepreneurial learning and farmer’s entrepreneurial performance[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014, (10): 62-75. (In Chinese)
[9]Ren Y H. Negative effects and positive functions of human emotions culture in rural areas: Taking Wenzhou rural areas for instance[J]. Zhejiang Social Science, 2012, (1): 130-135. (In Chinese)
[10]Ruan R P, Zheng F T. Kinship network and rural enterprises in the process of market liberalization[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2012, (1): 331-356. (In Chinese)
[11]Su F, Fang L. “Active Government” and the development of rural inclusive finance: Based on “Thousands villages investigation” of SUFE 2015[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016, (12): 72-83. (In Chinese)
[12]Wang R, Xue H Z. Entrepreneurial experience and new venture’s performance: A literature review[J]. Science of Science and Management of S&T., 2010, (6): 80-84. (In Chinese)
[13]Wang Y G. The framework of socioeconomics and the study of Chinese practical socioeconomic problem[M]. Sichuan: Southwest University of Finance and Economics Press, 2015. (In Chinese)
[14]Yang X R, Li X C. Geo-cultural similarity, prior experiences and the growth of pioneering agriculture entrepreneurs[J]. Academic Research Journal, 2013, (7): 64-69. (In Chinese)
[15]Zhai X W. The characteristics of Chinese interpersonal relationship: Local concept and model[J]. Sociological Research, 1993, (4): 74-83. (In Chinese)
[16]Barney J B. Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-20.
[17]Beckman C M. The influence of founding team company affiliation on firm behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 741-758.
[18]He Z-L, Wong P-K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.
[19]Lau K L A, Young A. Why China shall not completely transit from a relation based to a rule based governance regime: A Chinese perspective[J]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2013, 21(6): 577-585.
[20]Li S. China’s (painful) transition from relation-based to rule-based governance: When and how, not if and why[J]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2013, 21(6): 567-576.
[21]Stathopoulou S, Psaltopoulos D, Skuras D. Rural entrepreneurship in Europe[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 2009, 10(6): 404-425.
[22]Venkatraman N, Ramanujam V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11(4): 801-814.
Cite this article
Dong Jing, Xu Wanyu, Zhang Yu. Investigation of Performance of Rural Entrepreneurial Firms in China: Influence and Interaction between Renqing Relationship and Normative Experience[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(1): 20–32.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES