China's law on interim measures for arbitration has lots of flaws such as prohibiting arbitral tribunals from issuing this type of orders, no express provisions for the people's courts to enforce those tribunal-ordered provisional remedies, and no explicit rules for parties to seek directly conservatory measures from the people's courts. The best method for overcoming the flaws abovementioned is to revise the Arbitration Act to facilitate the users to apply. In the forthcoming revised Arbitration Act,in terms of the types of interim measures issued by arbitral tribunals, China should not allow preliminary orders and shall enact certain conditions like "urgency" for those interim measures other than evidential matters. China should also construct the norms of people's courts' enforcement of interim measures issued by arbitral tribunals and improve the rules for the peoples' courts as the subject issuing conservatory measures.
/ Journals / Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
GuoChanglin YanJinqiang WangWenbin WuWenfang, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Reconstruction of China's Law on Interim Measures for Arbitration
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Vol. 18, Issue 02, pp. 104 - 115 (2016) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2016.02.009
Abstract
References
Abstract
Cite this article
Zhang Shengcui. Reconstruction of China's Law on Interim Measures for Arbitration[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2016, 18(2): 104–115.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES