After nearly 30 years’ exploration from the connotation of university spin-offs to influencing factors and value creation functions, the research on university spin-offs has become an important academic issue. This article firstly uses CiteSpace to carry out the bibliometric analysis of 68 English documents and 17 Chinese documents from the Web of Science database and CNKI, and the time span of the retrieved documents ranges from 1987 to 2019. The bibliometric analysis mainly includes the analysis of statistical characteristics (overall publication trends, core publication journals and representative scholars) and the research hotspots of university spin-off literature. Based on the analysis of research hotspots, the research of university spin-offs can be divided into three parts: connotation and categories of university spin-offs, influencing factors of university spin-offs at different stages, and value creation functions of university spin-offs. Secondly, we comb the research results about the connotation and categories of university spin-offs, and point out that university spin-offs can be understood as enterprises founded by academic entrepreneurs with the support of university incubation mechanism. The establishment of university spin-offs experiences the transformation of technical knowledge from universities into business ideas. According to the internal differences between academic entrepreneurs and parent universities, there are six different ways of dividing university spin-offs. Thirdly, this article summarizes the growth stage models of university spin-offs designed by different scholars. Based on the four-stage model of Vanaelst, et al. (2010), we propose specific influencing factors that play an important role in the formation and development of university spin-offs, i.e. research commercialization and opportunity screening stage, incubation stage, sustainability proof stage, and maturity stage, and then partly outline the relationship among different influencing factors. Finally, this article summarizes value creation functions of university spin-offs from the perspectives of academic entrepreneurs, universities and regional environment. Through the review of researches, it is found that the connotation of university spin-offs gradually improves with the delineation of three key elements: academic entrepreneurs, technical knowledge, and university incubation mechanism. The latest research begins to emphasize the process of enterprise formation from a dynamic perspective. In the research commercialization and opportunity screening stage and incubation stage, the academic subjects represented by entrepreneurs and universities play a key role in the establishment of university spin-offs. During the stages of survivability proof and maturity, venture investors, governments, and other market and social entities have begun to play a leading role. The positive value creation functions of university spin-offs have been widely recognized, but their internal mechanism is not yet clear. On the whole, there is still huge theoretical innovation space for the discussion of university spin-offs. According to the focus and trends of existing literature, we believe that future research may achieve breakthroughs in four aspects: the influencing factors in different growth stages and their mechanism of action, the evolution of governance mechanism, the internal mechanism of its value creation, and the study of university spin-offs under the Chinese context.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
A Literature Review and Prospects of University Spin-offs
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 10, pp. 107 - 124 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200610.401
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Belitski M, Aginskaja A, Marozau R. Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(3): 601-615.
[2] Berbegal-Mirabent J, Ribeiro-Soriano D E, García J L S. Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation?[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(11): 2272-2278.
[3] Bjørnåli E S, Gulbrandsen M. Exploring board formation and evolution of board composition in academic spin-offs[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010, 35(1): 92-112.
[4] Borges C, Filion L J. Spin-off process and the development of academic entrepreneur’s social capital[J]. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2013, 8(1): 21-34.
[5] Ciuchta M P, Miner A S, Kim J Y, et al. Founding logics, technology validation, and the path to commercialization[J]. International Small Business Journal, 2017, 36(3): 1-24.
[6] Colombo M G, Piva E. Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(1): 79-92.
[7] D'Este P, Perkmann M. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, 36(3): 316-339.
[8] Fernández-Alles M, Camelo-Ordaz C, Franco-Leal N. Key resources and actors for the evolution of academic spin-offs[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2015, 40(6): 976-1002.
[9] Ferretti M, Ferri S, Fiorentino R, et al. Neither absent nor too present: the effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs[J]. Small Business Economics, 2019, 52(1): 153-173.
[10] Fini R, Fu K, Mathisen M T, et al. Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study[J]. Small Business Economics, 2017, 48(2): 361-391.
[11] Fini R, Rasmussen E, Wiklund J, et al. Theories from the lab: how research on science commercialization can contribute to management studies[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2019, 56(5): 865-894.
[12] Hayter C S. Harnessing university entrepreneurship for economic growth: Factors of success among university spin-offs[J]. Economic Development Quarterly, 2013, 27(1): 18-28.
[13] Hayter C S. Social networks and the success of university spin-offs: Toward an agenda for regional growth[J]. Economic Development Quarterly, 2015, 29(1): 3-13.
[14] Hayter C S. Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 475-490.
[15] Helm R, Mauroner O, Pöhlmann K. Towards a better understanding of performance measurements: The case of research-based spin-offs[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2018, 12(1): 135-166.
[16] Huynh T, Patton D, Arias-Aranda D, et al. University spin-off's performance: Capabilities and networks of founding teams at creation phase[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 78: 10-22.
[17] Kolb C, Wagner M. How university spin-offs differ in composition and interaction: a qualitative approach[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2018, 43(3): 734-759.
[18] Mathisen M T, Rasmussen E. The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2019, 44(6): 1891-1938.
[19] Maurer I, Bartsch V, Ebers M. The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth[J]. Organization Studies, 2011, 32(2): 157-185.
[20] Meoli M, Paleari S, Vismara S. The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin-offs[J]. Small Business Economics, 2019, 52(2): 485-504.
[21] Miranda F J, Chamorro A, Rubio S. Re-thinking university spin-off: A critical literature review and a research agenda[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2018, 43(4): 1007-1038.
[22] Mosey S, Wright M. From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology‐based academic entrepreneurs[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2010, 31(6): 909-935.
[23] Mustar P, Wright M. Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010, 35(1): 42-65.
[24] Prencipe A. Board composition and innovation in university spin-offs: evidence from the italian context[J]. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2016, 11(3): 33-39.
[25] Rasmussen E, Borch O J. University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(5): 602-612.
[26] Rasmussen E, Mosey S, Wright M. The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin-Off venture emergence[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(6): 1314-1345.
[27] Rasmussen E, Mosey S, Wright M. The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university spin-offs[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2015, 27(7-8): 430-457.
[28] Siegel D S, Wright M. Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink?[J]. British Journal of Management, 2015, 26(4): 582-595.
[29] Vanaelst I, Clarysse B, Wright M, et al. Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: an examination of team heterogeneity[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2010, 30(2): 249-271.
[30] Wright M, Clarysse B, Mosey S. Strategic entrepreneurship, resource orchestration and growing spin-offs from universities[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2012, 24(9): 911-927.
Cite this article
Gao Sheng, Wang Shiquan. A Literature Review and Prospects of University Spin-offs[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(10): 107-124.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES