3264 
4174Based on research literature retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI) and Web of Science Core Collection database (WoS CC), this study conducts a systematic literature review of industrial cluster ecosystems in the field of economics and management at home and abroad. Data analysis employs bibliometric techniques and visualization tools, such as keyword co-occurrence and cluster analysis, timeline view map and burst detection analysis, and article co-citation analysis. The results are as follows: (1) The overall stream of related researches can be summarized into four topics. The first topic is the organizational co-governance perspective, which highlights multi-actor governance systems based on the stakeholder theory. The second is the environmental harmony perspective, which is mainly associated with environmental factors supporting sustainable development. Within the value co-creation perspective, industrial cluster ecosystems provide a context that is conducive for value creation and realization, which represents the third topic. The final topic shown is the ecological symbiosis perspective, which contributes to the roles of both competition and cooperation in cluster co-evolution. (2) Tracking knowledge evolution in industrial cluster ecosystem research, the process of development is divided into three stages, namely, the initial stage (1992-2004), the exploration stage (2005-2016) and the rapid development stage (2017-present). The discussion of the three stages shows how the literature has evolved from the early conceptual metaphor based on analogical thinking, to systematic exploration focusing on innovation, and reflected a growing trend toward theoretical integration among social sciences. (3) The major research methods used in the literature reviewed are qualitative analysis methods, including constructive approaches, case studies and static analyses. However, quantitative methods for assessing and measuring characteristics and performance of cluster ecosystems are increasing recently. As a result of the review, a quintuple helix model of industrial cluster ecosystems has been developed to build a theoretical framework that reflects the complex interconnection among internal mechanisms, external conditions and research foundations. Finally, future research efforts in this area should be directed towards introducing specific analysis to understand heterogeneous industrial scenarios, exploring innovation network reconstruction of virtual industrial clusters, focusing on adaptive institutional change by integrating explicit and implicit coordination mechanisms, improving cluster platform architecture to support ecological upgrading, and emphasizing public participation in value co-creation and sharing within clusters.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Industrial Cluster Ecosystems: Topics, Evolution and Approach
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 44, Issue 05, pp. 114 - 135 (2022) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20220223.101
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Cai Jian, Zhu Yan. Open innovation model in digital economy [J]. Tsinghua Management Review,2021, (6): 14-20.
[2] Chen Xiaoyong. Virtual transformation of industrial clusters [J]. China Industrial Economics,2017, (12): 78-94.
[3] Chen Yufei, Ding Jing, Liu Zhifeng. Research on the structure, Evolution and Operation mechanism of industrial cluster ecosystem [J]. Science and Technology Management Research,2009, 29(10): 396-399.
[4] Fu Yifang, Zhu Bin. Research on sustainable innovation ecosystem of high-tech industrial cluster [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2004, 22(S1): 128-135.
[5] He Jishan, Dai Weiming. Ecological model and ecological balance analysis of industrial clusters [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2005, (1): 126-132.
[6] Jian Zhaoquan, Ling Hu Kerui, Li Lei. Evolution and Prospect of Value Co-creation Research -- From “Customer Experience” to “Service Ecosystem” Perspective [J]. Foreign Economics & Management,2016, 38(9): 3-20.
[7] Li Xiaohua, Liu Feng. Industrial ecosystem and the development of strategic emerging industries [J]. China Industrial Economics,2013, (3): 20-32.
[8] Liu Gang, Liu Jie. Innovation ecosystem of open industry and upgrading of Traditional industry cluster: A Case study of Special Cable Industry cluster in Gaogou Town, Wuwei County, Anhui Province [J]. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2019, 47(2): 39-50.
[9] Su Yiyi, Zhou Changhui. Business innovation driven by clusters [J]. Management World,2008, (3): 94-104.
[10] Wang Jiexiang, Cai Ning, Sheng Ya. Leading enterprises' cross-border entrepreneurship, dual-platform architecture and ecological upgrading of industrial clusters: A case study based on the "environmental Hospital" model in Yixing, Jiangsu Province [J]. China Industrial Economics,2018, (2): 157-175.
[11] Wang Xin, Li Ping. A Conceptual Framework of “Wu”-based Innovation at the Team Level: A Case Study on Indigenous Innovation in the Context of Aerospace Projects [J]. Foreign Economics & Management,2017, 39(3): 3-23.
[12] Zhang Yinyin, Deng Ling. Innovation Driving the Transformation and Upgrading from Traditional Industries to strategic Emerging Industries: Mechanism and path [J]. Economic Structural Reform,2013, (5): 97-101.
[13] Zheng Zhun, Zhang Fan, Wang Bingfu. Research on the Origin, Theoretical Framework and Future Prospects of Industrial Architecture [J]. Foreign Economics & Management,2020, 42(6): 3-19.
[14] Zhu Chunyang, Zeng Peilun. Innovation Network Reconstruction and Virtualization Transformation of Animation Industry Cluster Based on Network Platform: A Case study of USA, Japan and China [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition),2020, 31(5): 25-35.
[15] Ács Z J, Autio E, Szerb L. National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications[J]. Research Policy,2014, 43(3): 476-494.
[16] Alvedalen J, Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda[J]. European Planning Studies,2017, 25(6): 887-903.
[17] Aoki M. An organizational architecture of T-form: Silicon Valley clustering and its institutional coherence[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2004, 13(6): 967-981.
[18] Asheim B T, Boschma R, Cooke P. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases[J]. Regional Studies,2011, 45(7): 893-904.
[19] Auerswald P E, Dani L. The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The biotechnology cluster[J]. Small Business Economics,2017, 49(1): 97-117.
[20] Autio E. Strategic entrepreneurial internationalization: A normative framework[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2017, 11(3): 211-227.
[21] Baldassarre B, Schepers M, Bocken N, et al. Industrial Symbiosis: Towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology perspectives[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019, 216: 446-460.
[22] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Toward an institutional ecology of organizational founding[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996, 39(5): 1378-1427.
[23] Blasco-Arcas L, Alexander M, Sörhammar D, et al. Organizing actor Engagement: A platform perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 118: 74-85.
[24] Carayannis E G, Grigoroudis E, Campbell D F J, et al. The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models[J]. R& D Management,2018, 48(1): 148-162.
[25] Chakrabarty S. Value creation in industrial clusters: The strategic nature of relationships with stakeholders and the policy environment[J]. Journal of Strategy and Management,2020, 13(4): 535-550.
[26] Chopra S S, Khanna V. Understanding resilience in industrial symbiosis networks: Insights from network analysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2014, 141: 86-94.
[27] Duranton G, Puga D. Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products[J]. American Economic Review,2001, 91(5): 1454-1477.
[28] Ehrenfeld J, Gertler N. Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,1997, 1(1): 67-79.
[29] Feldman M P, Audretsch D B. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition[J]. European Economic Review,1999, 43(2): 409-429.
[30] Ferreira J J M, Fernandes C I, Ferreira F A F. To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance[J]. Journal of Business Research,2019, 101: 583-590.
[31] Finegold D. Creating self-sustaining, high-skill ecosystems[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,1999, 15(1): 60-81.
[32] Fraccascia L. The impact of technical and economic disruptions in industrial symbiosis relationships: An enterprise input-output approach[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2019, 213: 161-174.
[33] Fraccascia L, Giannoccaro I. What, where, and how measuring industrial symbiosis: A reasoned taxonomy of relevant indicators[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2020, 157: 104799.
[34] Genc O, van Capelleveen G, Erdis E, et al. A socio-ecological approach to improve industrial zones towards eco-industrial parks[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2019, 250: 109507.
[35] Hassink R. Regional resilience: A promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability?[J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,2010, 3(1): 45-58.
[36] Lenzen M. Structural path analysis of ecosystem networks[J]. Ecological Modelling,2007, 200(3-4): 334-342.
[37] Menzel M P, Fornahl D. Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2010, 19(1): 205-238.
[38] Mesquita L F. Starting over when the bickering never ends: Rebuilding aggregate trust among clustered firms through trust facilitators[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32(1): 72-91.
[39] Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(6): 1029-1055.
[40] Neves A, Godina R, Azevedo S G, et al. A comprehensive review of industrial symbiosis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020, 247: 119113.
[41] Pitelis C. Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2012, 21(6): 1359-1388.
[42] Porter M E. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy[J]. Economic Development Quarterly,2000, 14(1): 15-34.
[43] Rong K, Lin Y, Li B Y, et al. Business ecosystem research agenda: More dynamic, more embedded, and more internationalized[J]. Asian Business & Management,2018, 17(3): 167-182.
[44] Spigel B. The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(1): 49-72.
[45] Staber U. Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: The case of knitwear firms in Baden-Württemberg[J]. Regional Studies,2001, 35(4): 329-341.
[46] Stam E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique[J]. European Planning Studies,2015, 23(9): 1759-1769.
[47] Sussan F, Acs Z J. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem[J]. Small Business Economics,2017, 49(1): 55-73.
Cite this article
Hu Yabei. Industrial Cluster Ecosystems: Topics, Evolution and Approach[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2022, 44(5): 114-135.
Export Citations as:
For
