商学院的未来之路：知行合一

汪潇; 李平; 毕智慧

doi:doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.05.011

/ 期刊集群 / 外国经济与管理

外国经济与管理

主编：李增泉

常务副主编：郑春荣

副主编：阴慧芳贺小刚刘建国

ISSN：1001-4950

刊号：31-1063/F

创刊于1979年，是面向国内外公开发行的管理类学术期刊。

期刊首页 > 全部期刊 > 2019 > 05期 > 论文详细信息

商学院的未来之路：知行合一

汪潇1, 2, 李平 Correspondence author

, 3, 4, 毕智慧5

作者单位信息

HTML 全文 | PDF 全文(647.6 KB)

4325

6741

外国经济与管理 2019 年第 41 卷第 05 期, 页码：141 - 152 DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.05.011

出版日期：2019年5月1日

摘要

参考文献

摘要

尽管商学院学术与实践的脱节已越来越引起学界的重视，但如何找到更正确的参照对象，做到知行合一，尚未有明确的答案。本文通过回顾和梳理中外商学院的发展历程，分析了商学院困境的起源与恶化，并以医学院和法学院为参考，深入探讨了商学院研究和教育达到知行合一的基础，由此构建出涵盖科研和教育多方面的改革体系，包括：本科教育、应用型硕士教育或MBA等职业教育、研究型硕士及博士教育、创业教育、学术研究和探索及教职人员的绩效考核。

关键词

商学院; 改革; 知行合一

1 彼得•德鲁克. 管理的实践[M]. 机械工业出版社, 2009.

2 曹祖毅, 伊真真, 谭力文. 回顾与展望: 直面中国管理实践——基于" 中国• 实践• 管理” 论坛的探讨[J]. 管理学报,2015, 12: 322. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.03.002

3 陈春花. 管理研究与管理实践之弥合[J]. 管理学报,2017, 14(10): 1-5.

4 李平, 杨政银. 德鲁克书信及其评论[J]. 外国经济与管理,2017, 39(6): 3-5.

5 李平,杨政银,陈春花. 管理学术研究的" 知行合一”之道:融合德鲁克与马奇的独特之路[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(12): 22-45.

6 罗肖依, 孙黎. 从悖论元理论看知行合一[J]. 清华管理评论,2018, (4): 89-95.

7 彭贺, 刘莉, 苏勇. 中国商学院的趋同性分析: 基于新制度理论的解释[J]. 管理学报,2012, 9: 329. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2012.03.003

8 谭力文. 改革开放以来中国管理学发展的回顾与思考[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013, (1): 79-80.

9 魏江. 中国商学院5大发展趋势[J]. 企业家信息,2018, (6): 119-121.

10 武亚军. 基于理论发展的管理研究范式选择与中国管理学者定位[J]. 管理学报,2015, (12): 6-25.

11 徐淑英. 商学院的价值观和伦理: 做负责任的科学[J]. 管理学季刊,2016, (z1): 1-23.

12 徐淑英, 吕力. 中国本土管理研究的理论与实践问题: 对徐淑英的访谈[J]. 管理学报,2015, (12): 313.

13 余明阳. 中国的商学院向何处去——中国管理教育的深层反思[J]. 管理学报,2012, 9: 1577. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2012.11.002

14 张玉利. 管理学术界与企业界脱节的问题分析[J]. 管理学报,2008, (5): 336-339.

15 Adler N, Hellström T, Jacob M, et al. A model for the institutionalisation of university-industry partnerships: The FENIX Research Programme[J]. Knowledge Production in the Academy,2000: 125.

16 Alajoutsijärvi K, Juusola K, Siltaoja M. The legitimacy paradox of business schools: Losing by gaining?[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education,2015, 14: 277-291.

17 Bartunek J M. What has happened to Mode 2?[J]. British Journal of Management,2011, 22: 555-558. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2011.22.issue-3

18 Bennis W G, O’Toole, J. How business schools lost their way[J]. Harvard business review,2005, 83: 96-104.

19 Dimaggio P, Powellw W. The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review,1983, 48: 147-160. DOI:10.2307/2095101

20 Financial Times. FT global MBA ranking 2018: Methodology and key.

21 Frederick W C. Are business schools really necessary?[J]. California Management Review,1963, 5(4): 85-89. DOI:10.2307/41165551

22 Gordon R A, Howell J E. Higher education for business, New York, Columbia University Press.

23 Hambrick D C. What if the academy actually mattered?[J]. Academy of Management Review,1994, 19: 11-16.

24 Jacob M, Hellström T, Adler N, et al. From sponsorship to partnership in academy-industry relations[J]. R&D Management,2000, 30: 255-262.

25 Khurana R, Nohria N. It’s time to make management a true profession[J]. Harvard business review,2008, 86: 70-7, 140.

26 Khurana R, Penrice D. Business education: The american trajectory[J]. Business schools and their contribution to society,2011: 3-15.

27 Liang N, Lin S. Erroneous learning from the West? A narrative analysis of Chinese MBA cases published in 2008, 1992: 1999 and 2003[J]. Management International Review,2003, 48: 603-638.

28 Locke R R, Spender J C. Confronting managerialism: How the business elite and their schools threw our lives out of balance, Zed Books Ltd.

29 Macdonald S, Kam J. Ring a ring o’roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010, 44(4): 640-655.

30 Maclean D, Macintosh R, Grant S. Mode 2 management research[J]. British Journal of Management,2002, 13: 189-207. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2002.13.issue-3

31 Mintzberg H. Managers, not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development[M]. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

32 Muff K. Are business schools doing their job?[J]. Journal of Management Development,2012, 31: 648-662. DOI:10.1108/02621711211243854

33 Navarro, P. The MBA core curricula of top-ranked US business schools: a study in failure?[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education,2008, 7: 108-123.

34 Pettigrew A M. Management research after modernism[J]. British Journal of Management,2001, 12: S61-S70. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2001.12.issue-s1

35 Pfeffer J, Fong C T. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education,2002, 1: 78-95.

36 Pierson F C. The education of American businessmen: A study of university-college programs in business administration, McGraw-Hill.

37 Porter L W, Mckibbin L E. Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century?[M]. NewYork, McGraw-Hill.

38 Rynes S L, Bartunek J M, Daft R L. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001, 44: 340-355.

39 Shani A B, Mohrman S A, Pasmore W A, et al. Handbook of collaborative management research, Sage Publications.

40 Sillince J A, Brown A D. Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites[J]. Human Relations,2009, 62: 1829-1856. DOI:10.1177/0018726709336626

41 Starkey K. In defence of modes one, two and three: a response[J]. British Journal of Management,2001, 12: S77-S80. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2001.12.issue-s1

42 Starkey K, Madan P. Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research[J]. British Journal of Management,2001, 12: S3-S26. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2001.12.issue-s1

43 Starkey K, Tempest S. The future of the business school: Knowledge challenges and opportunities[J]. Human Relations,2005, 58: 61-82. DOI:10.1177/0018726705050935

44 Starkey K, Tempest S. A clear sense of purpose? The evolving role of the business school[J]. The Journal of Management Development,2008, 27: 379. DOI:10.1108/02621710810866732

45 Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches[J]. Academy of management review,1995, 20: 571-610. DOI:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

46 Tranfield D, Starkey K. The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy[J]. British Journal of Management,1998, 9: 341-353. DOI:10.1111/bjom.1998.9.issue-4

47 Van de Ven, A H, Meyer, A D, Jing R. Opportunities and challenges of engaged indigenous scholarship[J]. Management and Organization Review,2018: 1-14.

48 Van Aken J E. Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management[J]. British journal of management,2005, 16: 19-36. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2005.16.issue-1

49 Wilson D C, Thomas H. The legitimacy of the business of business schools: What’s the future?[J]. Journal of Management Development,2012, 31: 368-376. DOI:10.1108/02621711211219040

引用本文

汪潇, 李平, 毕智慧. 商学院的未来之路：知行合一[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(5): 141-152.

导出参考文献，格式为：

上一篇：创新团队的领导时间统筹与员工同步配合的协同机理研究

下一篇：CEO获奖与企业创新：基于信任治理的视角

本期封面

2019年第05期