8309 
8605在西方现代社会理论“实践转向”的大背景下，战略管理研究中兴起了“战略即实践”的视角，将战略实践活动、惯例以及实践者作为核心研究对象。经过二十多年的发展，“战略即实践”学派初步形成。它关注“生活世界”，以诠释学中的“筑造”模式和“栖居”模式为本体论基础，重新界定了战略研究中“结构”与“能动性”的关系，扩展了战略研究的边界，并与制度理论、惯例理论、身份理论、叙事理论进行了对话与融合。本文回顾并讨论了这一学派发展的基本脉络、哲学基础、基本原理、应用范例以及发展面临的挑战，指出了它对推动中国本土管理“实践转向”的启示。此外，本文从行动者、行动导向、行动逻辑等方面比较了它与中国古典“知行合一”观的异同，展望了研究本土管理实践和建构理论的新机会。
“战略即实践”学派述评——兼与“知行合一”观对话
摘要
参考文献
1 陈春花. 浅论管理研究与管理实务的结合[J]. 管理学报, 2017, （8）: 1123–1127.
4 孙黎, 李平. 好理论, 坏管理[J]. 中欧商业评论, 2014, （9）: 34–39.
5 徐淑英, 任兵, 吕力. 管理理论构建论文集[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
6 Bourdieu P, Nice R. Outline of a theory of practice[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
7 Bourdieu P, Nice R. The logic of practice[M]. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
8 Chia R, Holt R. Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective[J]. Organization Studies, 2006, 27（5）: 635–655. DOI:10.1177/0170840606064102
9 Chia R, MacKay B. Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice[J]. Human Relations, 2007, 60（1）: 217–242. DOI:10.1177/0018726707075291
10 Chia R, Rasche A. Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: Building and dwelling worldviews[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
11 Feldman M S. Theory of routine dynamics and connections to strategy as practice[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
12 Feldman M S, Orlikowski W J. Theorizing practice and practicing theory[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22（5）: 1240–1253. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
13 Fenton C, Langley A. Strategy as practice and the narrative turn[J]. Organization Studies, 2011, 32（9）: 1171–1196. DOI:10.1177/0170840611410838
14 Jarzabkowski P. Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use[J]. Organization Studies, 2004, 25（4）: 529–560. DOI:10.1177/0170840604040675
15 Jarzabkowski P. Shaping strategy as a structuration process[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51（4）: 621–650.
16 Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S, Seidl D, et al. On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research[J]. Strategic Organization, 2016, 14（3）: 248–259. DOI:10.1177/1476127015604125
17 Jarzabkowski P, Seidl D. The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy[J]. Organization Studies, 2008, 29（11）: 1391–1426. DOI:10.1177/0170840608096388
18 Jarzabkowski P, Spee A P. Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2009, 11（1）: 69–95. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.2009.11.issue-1
19 Jarzabkowski P, Wolf C. An activity theory approach to strategy as practice[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
20 Johnson G, Langley A, Melin L, et al. Introducing the strategy as practice perspective[A]. Johnson G, Langley A, Melin L, et al. Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
21 Johnson G, Melin L, Whittington R. Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40（1）: 3–22. DOI:10.1111/1467-6486.t01-2-00002
22 Johnson G, Prashantham S, Floyd S W, et al. The ritualization of strategy workshops[J]. Organization Studies, 2010, 31（12）: 1589–1618. DOI:10.1177/0170840610376146
23 Kaplan S. Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22（2）: 320–346. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0531
24 Langley A. The ongoing challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about strategy as practice[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
25 Lawrence T B, Suddaby R. Institutions and institutional work[A]. Clegg S R, Hardy C, Lawrence T B, et al. Handbook of organization studies[M]. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2006.
26 Lawrence T B, Suddaby R, Leca B. Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
27 Navis C, Glynn M A. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36（3）: 479–499.
28 Oliver D. Identity work as a strategic practice[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
29 Orlikowski W J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2000, 11（4）: 404–428. DOI:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
30 Orlikowski W J. Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
31 Sandberg J, Dall’Alba G. Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective[J]. Organization Studies, 2009, 30（12）: 1349–1368. DOI:10.1177/0170840609349872
32 Sandberg J, Tsoukas H. Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36（2）: 338–360.
33 Schatzki T R, Cetina K K, von Savigny E. The practice turn in contemporary theory[M]. London: Routledge, 2001.
34 Seidl D. General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: A systemic-discursive perspective[J]. Organization Studies, 2007, 28（2）: 197–218. DOI:10.1177/0170840606067994
35 Seidl D, Whittington R. Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies[J]. Organization Studies, 2014, 35（10）: 1407–1421. DOI:10.1177/0170840614541886
36 Smets M, Aristidou A, Whittington R. Towards a practice-driven institutionalism[A]. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence T B, et al. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2017.
37 Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R. From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55（4）: 877–904. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0013
38 Splitter V, Seidl D. Practical relevance of practice-based research on strategy[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
39 Suddaby R, Seidl D, Lê J K. Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory[J]. Strategic Organization, 2013, 11（3）: 329–344. DOI:10.1177/1476127013497618
40 Tsoukas H. Making strategy: Meta-theoretical insights from Heideggerian phenomenology[A]. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, et al. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
41 Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2012, 6（1）: 285–336. DOI:10.1080/19416520.2012.672039
42 Whittington R. Strategy as practice[J]. Long Range Planning, 1996, 29（5）: 731–735. DOI:10.1016/0024-6301(96)00068-4
43 Whittington R. Completing the practice turn in strategy research[J]. Organization Studies, 2006, 27（5）: 613–634. DOI:10.1177/0170840606064101
44 Whittington R. Strategy practice and strategy process: Family differences and the sociological eye[J]. Organization Studies, 2007, 28（10）: 1575–1586. DOI:10.1177/0170840607081557
引用本文
肖建强, 孙黎, 罗肖依. “战略即实践”学派述评——兼与“知行合一”观对话[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(3): 3-19.
导出参考文献，格式为：
