3812 
3421尽管谏言员工是组织效能的重要贡献者，它所具有的挑战性及结果的不确定性也会使得领导者作出消极反应（即领导拒谏）。本研究基于动机社会认知视角构建了领导拒谏的动机社会认知模型，详细阐释了认知动机、存在动机和意识形态动机对领导拒谏的影响，并从个体特质和情境因素两个方面探讨了三种动机的驱动因素。最后，本研究对未来研究方向进行了展望，如通过实证研究探讨动机认知因素在个性特征和情境因素与领导拒谏之间的中介作用，探索其他动机因素对领导拒谏的影响，以及个性特征和情境因素对动机认知的交互作用，从其他理论视角来探讨领导拒谏的影响因素等。
领导为什么拒谏：基于动机社会认知视角的阐释
摘要
参考文献
3 韩翼, 董越, 胡筱菲, 等. 员工进谏策略及其有效性研究[J]. 管理学报,2017, (12): 1777-1785. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2017.12.005
6 刘文兴, 廖建桥, 黄诗华. 不确定性规避、工作负担与领导授权行为: 控制愿望与管理层级的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2012, (5): 4-12, 94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.05.002
8 王爱华. 英汉拒绝言语行为表达模式调查[J]. 外语教学与研究,2001, (3): 178-185. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0429.2001.03.004
9 王凯, 韩翼, 余涵烟. 基于权力感知调节作用的领导对员工谏言反应研究[J]. 管理学报,2018, (2): 209-216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2018.02.007
10 许黎明, 赵曙明, 张敏. 二元工作激情中介作用下的辱虐管理对员工建言行为影响研究[J]. 管理学报,2018, (10): 988-995. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2018.10.006
14 Anseel F, Beatty A S, Shen W, et al. How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior[J]. Journal of Management,2015, 41(1): 318-348. DOI:10.1177/0149206313484521
15 Brandt M J, Chambers J R, Crawford J T, et al. Bounded openness: The effect of openness to experience on intolerance is moderated by target group conventionality[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2015, 109(3): 549-568. DOI:10.1037/pspp0000055
16 Burris E R. The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2012, 55(4): 851-875. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0562
17 Cheng B S, Boer D, Chou L F, et al. Paternalistic leadership in four East Asian societies: Generalizability and cultural differences of the triad model[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2014, 45(1): 82-90. DOI:10.1177/0022022113490070
18 Cohrs J C, Kämpfe-Hargrave N, Riemann R. Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: Evidence from peer-report data[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2012, 103(2): 343-361. DOI:10.1037/a0028706
19 Fast N J, Burris E R, Bartel C A. Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2014, 57(4): 1013-1034. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0393
20 Garner J T. Open doors and iron cages: Supervisors’ responses to employee dissent[J]. International Journal of Business Communication,2016, 53(1): 27-54. DOI:10.1177/2329488414525466
21 Guntzviller L M, MacGeorge E L. Modeling interactional influence in advice exchanges: Advice giver goals and recipient evaluations[J]. Communication Monographs,2013, 80(1): 83-100. DOI:10.1080/03637751.2012.739707
22 Huang X, Xu E, Huang L, et al. Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers’ responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2018, 103(10): 1101-1120. DOI:10.1037/apl0000326
23 Lam C F, Lee C, Sui Y. Say it as it is: Consequences of voice directness, voice politeness, and voicer credibility on voice endorsement[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2019, 104(5): 642-658. DOI:10.1037/apl0000358
24 Piezunka H, Dahlander L. Idea rejected, tie formed: Organizations’ feedback on crowdsourced ideas[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2019, 62(2): 503-530. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0703
25 Timming A R, Johnstone S. Employee silence and the authoritarian personality: A political psychology of workplace democracy[J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2015, 23(1): 154-171. DOI:10.1108/IJOA-06-2013-0685
引用本文
韩翼, 肖素芳. 领导为什么拒谏：基于动机社会认知视角的阐释[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(8): 68-80.
导出参考文献，格式为：
