战略行动场域理论是一个旨在解释社会行动者如何在特定场域中建立和维持秩序的综合性理论。该理论基于经济社会学、制度理论、社会运动理论,为理解社会变革和社会创新发生的方式与发展的过程提供了新的理论视角,在组织管理研究领域表现出了较强的应用与发展潜力,尤其适合在当下愈加复杂和高度不确定的环境中探讨组织的行动机制、组织与制度的互动机制等研究话题。本文首先基于文献计量的方法,对战略行动场域理论近十多年的发展与应用进行了系统分析;其次,结合定量分析的结果和定性的方法,梳理了战略行动场域理论的核心内容及拓展;文章最后提出了未来潜在的研究方向。本文首次将战略行动场域理论引入中文世界,希望有助于学者们了解该理论的核心内容与应用情况,推动探索组织在复杂环境中的可持续发展路径,构建战略行动场域中组织行动测量体系,加强各学科之间的对话,并结合中国情境下的实际问题,发展和构建本土化理论。
战略行动场域理论研究新进展
摘要
参考文献
1 Apajalahti E L, Temmes A, Lempiälä T. Incumbent organisations shaping emerging technological fields: Cases of solar photovoltaic and electric vehicle charging[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2018, 30(1): 44-57.
2 Barinaga E. Coopted! Mission drift in a social venture engaged in a cross-sectoral partnership[J]. VOLUNTAS:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2020, 31(2): 437-449. DOI:10.1007/s11266-018-0019-6
3 Barman E. Varieties of field theory and the sociology of the non-profit sector[J]. Sociology Compass, 2016, 10(6): 442-458. DOI:10.1111/soc4.12377
4 Becker S D, Messner M, Schäffer U. The interplay of core and peripheral actors in the trajectory of an accounting innovation: Insights from beyond budgeting[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2020, 37(4): 2224-2256. DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12593
5 Blanchet T. Struggle over energy transition in Berlin: How do grassroots initiatives affect local energy policy-making?[J]. Energy Policy, 2015, 78: 246-254. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.001
6 Bourdieu P, Wacquant L J D. An invitation to reflexive sociology[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
7 Bozic B, Siebert S, Martin G. A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair[J]. European Management Journal, 2019, 37(1): 58-66. DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2018.04.005
8 Buchanan S, Barnett M L. Inside the velvet glove: Sustaining private regulatory institutions through hollowing and fortifying[J]. Organization Science, 2022, 33(6): 2159-2186. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2021.1537
9 Canzler W, Engels F, Rogge J C, et al. From “living lab” to strategic action field: Bringing together energy, mobility, and Information Technology in Germany[J]. Energy Research & Social Science, 2017, 27: 25-35.
10 Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2006.
11 Chen K K. Interorganizational advocacy among nonprofit organizations in strategic action fields: Exogenous shocks and local responses[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2018, 47(4_suppl): 97S-118S. DOI:10.1177/0899764017753319
12 Colwell S R, Joshi A W. Corporate ecological responsiveness: Antecedent effects of institutional pressure and top management commitment and their impact on organizational performance[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013, 22(2): 73-91. DOI:10.1002/bse.732
13 DeJordy R, Scully M, Ventresca M J, et al. Inhabited ecosystems: Propelling transformative social change between and through organizations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2020, 65(4): 931-971. DOI:10.1177/0001839219899613
14 Dimaggio P. Interest and agency in institutional theory[A]. Zucker L G. Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment[M]. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing, 1988.
15 DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160. DOI:10.2307/2095101
16 Faulconbridge J, Muzio D. Field partitioning: The emergence, development and consolidation of subfields[J]. Organization Studies, 2021, 42(7): 1053-1083. DOI:10.1177/0170840619855745
17 Fligstein N. Social skill and institutional theory[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 1997, 40(4): 397-405. DOI:10.1177/0002764297040004003
18 Fligstein N, McAdam D. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields[J]. Sociological Theory, 2011, 29(1): 1-26. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x
19 Fligstein N, McAdam D. A theory of fields[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
20 Fuchs G, Hinderer N. One or many transitions: Local electricity experiments in Germany[J]. Innovation:The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2016, 29(3): 320-336. DOI:10.1080/13511610.2016.1188683
21 Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue[J]. Organization Studies, 2007, 28(7): 957-969. DOI:10.1177/0170840607078958
22 Goh C, Wee K, Yeoh B S A. Migration governance and the migration industry in Asia: Moving domestic workers from Indonesia to Singapore[J]. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2017, 17(3): 401-433. DOI:10.1093/irap/lcx010
23 Haug C. Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution[J]. Organization Studies, 2013, 34(5-6): 705-732. DOI:10.1177/0170840613479232
24 Helfen M. Institutionalizing precariousness? The politics of boundary work in legalizing agency work in Germany, 1949–2004[J]. Organization Studies, 2015, 36(10): 1387-1422. DOI:10.1177/0170840615585338
25 Hoffman A J. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U. S. chemical industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(4): 351-371. DOI:10.2307/257008
26 Kauppinen I, Cantwell B, Slaughter S. Social mechanisms and strategic action fields: The example of the emergence of the European Research Area[J]. International Sociology, 2017, 32(6): 796-813. DOI:10.1177/0268580917726630
27 Kim S, Schifeling T. Good corp, bad corp, and the rise of B Corps: How market incumbents’ diverse responses reinvigorate challengers[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2022, 67(3): 674-720. DOI:10.1177/00018392221091734
28 Kjeldgaard D, Askegaard S, Rasmussen J Ø, et al. Consumers’ collective action in market system dynamics: A case of beer[J]. Marketing Theory, 2017, 17(1): 51-70. DOI:10.1177/1470593116658197
29 Klyver K, Arenius P. Networking, social skills and launching a new business: A 3-year study of nascent entrepreneurs[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2022, 46(5): 1256-1283. DOI:10.1177/1042258720967063
30 Kungl G. Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition[J]. Energy Research & Social Science, 2015, 8: 13-23.
31 Kungl G, Hess D J. Sustainability transitions and strategic action fields: A literature review and discussion[J]. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2021, 38: 22-33. DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.004
32 Laamanen M, Skålén P. Collective-conflictual value co-creation: A strategic action field approach[J]. Marketing Theory, 2015, 15(3): 381-400. DOI:10.1177/1470593114564905
33 Leiringer R. Sustainable construction through industry self-regulation: The development and role of building environmental assessment methods in achieving green building[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(21): 8853. DOI:10.3390/su12218853
34 Litrico J B, David R J. The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Actor positions, framing trajectories, and field settlement[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(3): 986-1015. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0156
35 Loscher G, Löhlein L, Lenz H. Dual roles and blurred identities: A framing contest between professional associations in a local strategic action field[J]. European Accounting Review, 2021, 30(3): 503-529. DOI:10.1080/09638180.2021.1882319
36 Maclean M, Harvey C, Suddaby R, et al. Political ideology and the discursive construction of the multinational hotel industry[J]. Human Relations, 2018, 71(6): 766-795. DOI:10.1177/0018726717718919
37 Maguire S, Hardy C, Lawrence T B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(5): 657-679. DOI:10.2307/20159610
38 Mair J, Marti I. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2009, 24(5): 419-435. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006
39 Mair J, Martí I, Ventresca M J. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(4): 819-850. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0627
40 Marano V, Kostova T. Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53(1): 28-54. DOI:10.1111/joms.12124
41 Marchetti S. The global governance of paid domestic work: Comparing the impact of ILO convention No. 189 in Ecuador and India[J]. Critical Sociology, 2018, 44(7-8): 1191-1205. DOI:10.1177/0896920517751590
42 McDonnell M H, King B. Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2013, 58(3): 387-349. DOI:10.1177/0001839213500032
43 McDonnell M H, Werner T. Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2016, 61(4): 584-620. DOI:10.1177/0001839216648953
44 Molina J L, Valenzuela-García H, Lubbers M J, et al. “The cowl does make the monk”: Understanding the emergence of social entrepreneurship in times of Downturn[J]. VOLUNTAS:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2018, 29(4): 725-739. DOI:10.1007/s11266-017-9921-6
45 Moulton S, Sandfort J R. The strategic action field framework for policy implementation research[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2017, 45(1): 144-169. DOI:10.1111/psj.12147
46 Ness E C, Rubin P G, Hammond L. Becoming a “game changer”: Complete College America’s role in U. S. higher education policy fields[J]. Higher Education, 2021, 82: 1-17. DOI:10.1007/s10734-020-00619-x
47 Özen H, Özen Ş. Interactions in and between strategic action fields: A comparative analysis of two environmental conflicts in gold-mining fields in Turkey[J]. Organization & Environment, 2011, 24(4): 343-363.
48 Pape U, Brandsen T, Pahl J B, et al. Changing policy environments in europe and the resilience of the third sector[J]. VOLUNTAS:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2020, 31(1): 238-249. DOI:10.1007/s11266-018-00087-z
49 Paredes-rodriguez A A, Spierings B. Dynamics of protest and participation in the governance of tourism in Barcelona: A strategic action field perspective[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020, 28(12): 2118-2135. DOI:10.1080/09669582.2020.1791891
50 Pedeliento G, Andreini D, Dalli D. From mother’s ruin to ginaissance: Emergence, settlement and resettlement of the gin category[J]. Organization Studies, 2020, 41(7): 969-992. DOI:10.1177/0170840619883366
51 Rey-García M, Calvo N, Mato-Santiso V. Collective social enterprises for social innovation: Understanding the potential and limitations of cross-sector partnerships in the field of work integration[J]. Management Decision, 2019, 57(6): 1415-1440. DOI:10.1108/MD-01-2017-0091
52 Schudde L, Jabbar H, Hartman C. How political and ecological contexts shape community college transfer[J]. Sociology of Education, 2021, 94(1): 65-83. DOI:10.1177/0038040720954817
53 Spence C, Carter C, Husillos J, et al. Taste matters: Cultural capital and elites in proximate strategic action fields[J]. Human Relations, 2017, 70(2): 211-236. DOI:10.1177/0018726716649247
54 Taylor R, Rees J, Damm C. UK employment services: Understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field[J]. Policy & Politics, 2016, 44(2): 253-267.
55 Thornton P H, Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 105(3): 801-843. DOI:10.1086/210361
56 Wacquant L, Akçaoğlu A. Practice and symbolic power in Bourdieu: The view from Berkeley[J]. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2017, 17(1): 55-69. DOI:10.1177/1468795X16682145
57 Wadhwani R D. Interfield dynamics: Law and the creation of new organisational fields in the nineteenth-century United States[J]. Business History, 2018, 60(5): 628-654. DOI:10.1080/00076791.2017.1346610
58 Werner M D, Cornelissen J P. Framing the change: Switching and blending frames and their role in instigating institutional change[J]. Organization Studies, 2014, 35(10): 1449-1472. DOI:10.1177/0170840614539314
59 Willers J O. Seeding the cloud: Consultancy services in the nascent field of cyber capacity building[J]. Public Administration, 2022, 100(3): 538-553. DOI:10.1111/padm.12773
60 Wooten M E, Hoffman A J. Organizational fields: Past, present and future[A]. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence T, et al. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism[M]. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2017.
引用本文
李佳, 冯天丽, 万代彬. 战略行动场域理论研究新进展[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(8): 3-17.
导出参考文献,格式为: