, 2
5647 
7153多产品企业出口在我国对外出口中一直扮演着十分重要的角色。随着中间品贸易在全球贸易中重要性的逐步提高，在当前逆全球化态势愈演愈烈的情况下，研究多产品企业在面对贸易自由化冲击时，如何通过调整其不同产品的成本加成，优化企业内资源配置并提高企业竞争力，具有十分重要的意义。文章基于修改后的De Loecker等（2016）方法，估计了中国制造业企业在产品层面的成本加成，并利用中国工业企业和海关数据，研究了我国多产品企业在中间品贸易自由化条件下，对其内部不同类型产品成本加成的调整差异。研究表明，进口中间产品关税下降会促使多产品出口企业提高其出口产品的成本加成，且对非核心产品成本加成的调整幅度更大；随着产品排序的增大，企业对其成本加成的调整幅度也增大。也就是说，中间品贸易自由化有助于缩小企业内部核心与非核心产品间成本加成的差异，进而优化企业内资源配置。影响机制分析与内生性和稳健性检验进一步支持了文章的研究结论。文章的研究对于进一步提高当前贸易摩擦频发环境下我国出口企业的抗压能力和整体竞争力，推动形成全面开放的贸易新格局具有一定的启示意义。
贸易自由化、成本加成与企业内资源配置
摘要
参考文献
1 樊海潮,郭光远. 出口价格、出口质量与生产率间的关系:中国的证据[J]. 世界经济,2015,(2):58−85. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1369.2015.02.005
2 樊海潮,张丽娜. 中间品贸易与中美贸易摩擦的福利效应:基于理论与量化分析的研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2018,(9):41−59.
3 钱学锋,范冬梅. 国际贸易与企业成本加成:一个文献综述[J]. 经济研究,2015,(2):172−185. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5719.2015.02.131
10 Amiti M,Konings J. Trade liberalization,intermediate inputs,and productivity:Evidence from Indonesia[J]. The American Economic Review,2007,97(5): 1611−1638. DOI:10.1257/aer.97.5.1611
12 Arkolakis C,Costinot A,Rodriguez-Clare A. New trade models,same old gains?[J]. American Economic Review,2012,102(1): 94−130. DOI:10.1257/aer.102.1.94
13 Bas M,Strauss-Kahn V. Input-trade liberalization,export prices and quality upgrading[J]. Journal of International Economics,2015,95(2): 250−262. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.005
14 Brandt L,VanBiesebroeck J,Zhang Y F. Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2012,97(2): 339−351. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.02.002
15 Cai H B,Liu Q. Competition and corporate tax avoidance:Evidence from Chinese industrial firms[J]. The Economic Journal,2009,119(537): 764−795. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02217.x
16 Chatterjee A,Dix-Carneiro R,Vichyanond J. Multi-product firms and exchange rate fluctuations[J]. American Economic Journal:Economic Policy,2013,5(2): 77−110. DOI:10.1257/pol.5.2.77
17 Chen N,Imbs J,Scott A. The dynamics of trade and competition[J]. Journal of International Economics,2009,77(1): 50−62. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.003
18 De Loecker J,Goldberg P K. Firm performance in a global market[J]. Annual Review of Economics,2014,6(1): 201−227. DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-080113-104741
19 De Loecker J,Goldberg P K,Khandelwal A K,et al. Prices,markups,and trade reform[J]. Econometrica,2016,84(2): 445−510. DOI:10.3982/ECTA11042
20 De Loecker J,Warzynski F. Markups and firm-level export status[J]. American Economic Review,2012,102(6): 2437−2471. DOI:10.1257/aer.102.6.2437
21 Eckel C,Iacovone L,Javorcik B,et al. Multi-product firms at home and away:Cost-versus quality-based competence[J]. Journal of International Economics,2015,95(2): 216−232. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.012
22 Epifani P,Gancia G. Trade,markup heterogeneity and misallocations[J]. Journal of International Economics,2011,83(1): 1−13. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.10.005
23 Fan H C,Gao X,Li Y A,et al. Trade liberalization and markups:Micro evidence from China[J]. Journal of Compara- tive Economics,2018,46(1): 103−130. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2017.02.002
24 Fan H C,Li Y A,Yeaple S R. Trade liberalization,quality,and export prices[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,2015a,97(5): 1033−1051. DOI:10.1162/REST_a_00524
25 Fan H C,Lai E L C,Li Y A. Credit constraints,quality,and export prices:Theory and evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2015b,43(2): 390−416. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.007
26 Feng L,Li Z Y,Swenson D L. The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports:Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Journal of International Economics,2016,101: 86−101. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.004
27 Goldberg P K,Khandelwal A K,Pavcnik N,et al. Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth:Evidence from India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2010,125(4): 1727−1767. DOI:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727
29 Halpern L,Koren M,Szeidl A. Imported inputs and productivity[J]. American Economic Review,2015,105(12): 3660−3703. DOI:10.1257/aer.20150443
30 Kee H L,Tang H W. Domestic value added in exports:Theory and firm evidence from China[J]. American Economic Review,2016,106(6): 1402−1436. DOI:10.1257/aer.20131687
31 Khandelwal A. The long and short (of) quality ladders[J]. Review of Economic Studies,2010,77(4): 1450−1476. DOI:10.1111/roes.2010.77.issue-4
32 Kleibergen F,Paap R. Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition[J]. Journal of Econometrics,2006,133(1): 97−126. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011
33 Konings J,Van Cayseele P,Warzynski F. The dynamics of industrial mark-ups in two small open economies:Does national competition policy matter?[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2001,19(5): 841−859. DOI:10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00096-5
34 Lerner A P. The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1934,1(3): 157−175. DOI:10.2307/2967480
35 Lu Y, Tao Z G, Yu L H. Agglomeration and Markup[R]. MPRA Working Paper No.38974, 2012.
36 Manova K,Yu Z H. How firms export:Processing vs. ordinary trade with financial frictions[J]. Journal of International Economics,2016,100: 120−137. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.02.005
37 Mayer T,Melitz M J,Ottaviano G I P. Market size,competition,and the product mix of exporters[J]. American Economic Review,2014,104(2): 495−536. DOI:10.1257/aer.104.2.495
39 Peters M. Heterogeneous mark-ups and endogenous misallocation[R]. MIT Working Paper No.78, 2011.
40 Tang H W,Zhang Y F. Exchange rates and the margins of trade:Evidence from Chinese exporters[J]. CESifo Economic Studies,2012,58(4): 671−702. DOI:10.1093/cesifo/ifs006
41 Yu M J. Processing trade,tariff reductions and firm productivity:Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Economic Journal,2015,125(585): 943−988. DOI:10.1111/ecoj.2015.125.issue-585
引用本文
樊海潮, 张丽娜. 贸易自由化、成本加成与企业内资源配置[J]. 财经研究, 2019, 45(5): 139-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
