In recent years, the research on Chinese multi-product firms has aroused wide attention. As an important part of Chinese trade, data show that about 75% of the total export enterprises are multi-product firms in China, and the exports of MFNs take up more than 95% of the total export values between 2000 and 2005. Additionally, based on the product classification by BEC (Broad Economic Categories), the imports of intermediate goods account for more than 70% of Chinese total import values. Therefore, it is more in line with China’s national conditions and significant to explore the effect of intermediate trade liberalization on Chinese multi-product firms. Especially, with the rising events of de-globalization, the study on how to face the shock of intermediate liberalization by adjusting the markups of different products, and to optimize the resource allocation within enterprises and improve the competitiveness of Chinese MFNs, becomes of much greater importance for China nowadays. In this paper, based on Melitz and Ottaviano (2008), we first theoretically construct a heterogeneous firm model with the variable markup, and then estimate the firm-product level markup of Chinese manufacturing firms by modifying the augmented approach proposed by De Loecker, et al. (2016). Using highly disaggregated Chinese firm-level data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) and Chinese Custom data, this paper empirically uncovers the patterns of how Chinese multi-product exporters adjust the markups of their core and non-core products, during the intermediate trade liberalization. We find that core products enjoy the highest markup in a multi-product firm and the firm tends to adjust its non-core products’ markups more after the reduction of intermediate input tariff. To be more specific, the closer a product situates to the core product in the product rank ladder, the greater extent that the firm would adjust its markup to. This indicates that the intermediate input liberalization would help to narrow the gap between the core and the non-core products within the multi-product firms, and thus optimize the resource allocation. In addition, we do a series of robustness checks, which further support our aforementioned main findings. On the one hand, our research contributes to the traditional literature by examining whether and how input tariff reduction would help to adjust the markups between the core and non-core products within MFNs. On the other hand, this paper is complementary to a large body of studies on the impact of trade liberalization on market power and resource allocation. Our results suggest that China should further promote the process of trade liberalization, especially the intermediate trade liberalization, to help to optimize the resource allocation within firms. In contrast to the previous study which shows that trade liberalization can be not to the benefit of the development of weak (non-core) products (industries), we find that after the tariff reduction of intermediate goods, Chinese exporters tend to improve the markups more for the non-core products. Therefore, we suggest that one should continue to implement the product diversification strategy in the MFNs, so as to further enhance the comprehensive competitiveness of Chinese exporters and improve their ability to confront the worldwide intensive pressure by the frequent rising trade frictions, and then help to complement the strategy of building up national strength with international trade in the new era.
Trade Liberalization, Markup and Resource Allocation
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 45, Issue 05, pp. 139 - 152 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.05.011
Fan H C, Guo G Y. The relationship between export prices, export quality and productivity: Evidence from China[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2015, (2): 58-85. (In Chinese)
Fan H C, Zhang L N. Intermediate goods trade and Sino-American trade frictions effects on welfare: Based on the theoretical and quantitative perspective[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (9): 41-59. (In Chinese)
Qian X F, Fan D M. Price-cost markup and international trade: A survey[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, (2): 172-185. (In Chinese)
Qian X F, Fan D M, Huang H M. Import competition and price-cost markup of Chinese manufacturing firms[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2016, (3): 71-49. (In Chinese)
Qian X F, Pan Y, Mao H T. Export tax rebate, price-cost markup and resource misallocation[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2015, (8): 80-106. (In Chinese)
Qian X F, Wang S, Chen Y B. China’s multi-product export enterprises and their product range: Facts and explanations[J]. Management World, 2013, (1): 9-27. (In Chinese)
Xu J Y, Tong J D, Mao Q L. Changes in RMB exchange rate, product sorting and export behavior of multi-Product enterprises: A case study of Chinese manufacturing firms[J]. Management World, 2015, (2): 17-31. (In Chinese)
Yu M J. Trade liberalization and productivity: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010, (12): 97-110. (In Chinese)
Zhu S J, Zhong T L, Li R Y. Input trade liberalization and product markup of multi-product exporters[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (1): 41-59. (In Chinese)
Amiti M, Konings J. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia[J]. The American Economic Review, 2007, 97(5): 1611-1638. DOI:10.1257/aer.97.5.1611
Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Donaldson D, et al. The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2019, 86(1): 46-80.
Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Rodriguez-Clare A. New trade models, same old gains?[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(1): 94-130. DOI:10.1257/aer.102.1.94
Bas M, Strauss-Kahn V. Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2015, 95(2): 250-262. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.005
Brandt L, VanBiesebroeck J, Zhang Y F. Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2012, 97(2): 339-351. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.02.002
Cai H B, Liu Q. Competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms[J]. The Economic Journal, 2009, 119(537): 764-795. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02217.x
Chatterjee A, Dix-Carneiro R, Vichyanond J. Multi-product firms and exchange rate fluctuations[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2013, 5(2): 77-110. DOI:10.1257/pol.5.2.77
Chen N, Imbs J, Scott A. The dynamics of trade and competition[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2009, 77(1): 50-62. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.003
De Loecker J, Goldberg P K. Firm performance in a global market[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2014, 6(1): 201-227. DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-080113-104741
De Loecker J, Goldberg P K, Khandelwal A K, et al. Prices, markups, and trade reform[J]. Econometrica, 2016, 84(2): 445-510. DOI:10.3982/ECTA11042
De Loecker J, Warzynski F. Markups and firm-level export status[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(6): 2437-2471. DOI:10.1257/aer.102.6.2437
Eckel C, Iacovone L, Javorcik B, et al. Multi-product firms at home and away: Cost-versus quality-based competence[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2015, 95(2): 216-232. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.012
Epifani P, Gancia G. Trade, markup heterogeneity and misallocations[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2011, 83(1): 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.10.005
Fan H C, Gao X, Li Y A, et al. Trade liberalization and markups: Micro evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2018, 46(1): 103-130. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2017.02.002
Fan H C, Li Y A, Yeaple S R. Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2015a, 97(5): 1033-1051. DOI:10.1162/REST_a_00524
Fan H C, Lai E L C, Li Y A. Credit constraints, quality, and export prices: Theory and evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2015b, 43(2): 390-416. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.007
Feng L, Li Z Y, Swenson D L. The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2016, 101: 86-101. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.004
Goldberg P K, Khandelwal A K, Pavcnik N, et al. Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2010, 125(4): 1727-1767. DOI:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727
Goldberg P K, Pavcnik N. Trade, wages, and the political economy of trade protection: Evidence from the Colombian trade reforms[J]. Journalof International Economics, 2005, 66(1): 75-105.
Halpern L, Koren M, Szeidl A. Imported inputs and productivity[J]. American Economic Review, 2015, 105(12): 3660-3703. DOI:10.1257/aer.20150443
Kee H L, Tang H W. Domestic value added in exports: Theory and firm evidence from China[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(6): 1402-1436. DOI:10.1257/aer.20131687
Khandelwal A. The long and short (of) quality ladders[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2010, 77(4): 1450-1476. DOI:10.1111/roes.2010.77.issue-4
Kleibergen F, Paap R. Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2006, 133(1): 97-126. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011
Konings J, Van Cayseele P, Warzynski F. The dynamics of industrial mark-ups in two small open economies: Does national competition policy matter?[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001, 19(5): 841-859. DOI:10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00096-5
Lerner A P. The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1934, 1(3): 157-175. DOI:10.2307/2967480
Lu Y, Tao Z G, Yu L H. Agglomeration and Markup[R]. MPRA Working Paper No.38974, 2012.
Manova K, Yu Z H. How firms export: Processing vs. ordinary trade with financial frictions[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2016, 100: 120-137. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.02.005
Mayer T, Melitz M J, Ottaviano G I P. Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporters[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(2): 495-536. DOI:10.1257/aer.104.2.495
Melitz M J, Ottaviano G I P. Market size, trade, and productivity[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2008, 75(1): 295-316.
Peters M. Heterogeneous mark-ups and endogenous misallocation[R]. MIT Working Paper No.78, 2011.
Tang H W, Zhang Y F. Exchange rates and the margins of trade: Evidence from Chinese exporters[J]. CESifo Economic Studies, 2012, 58(4): 671-702. DOI:10.1093/cesifo/ifs006
Yu M J. Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Economic Journal, 2015, 125(585): 943-988. DOI:10.1111/ecoj.2015.125.issue-585
Cite this article
Fan Haichao, Zhang Lina. Trade Liberalization, Markup and Resource Allocation[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 45(5): 139-152.
Previous: Does the Deepening of Free Trade Agreements among the Belt and Road Countries Promote Regional Value Chain Cooperation?