3615 
4515国家间距离是跨国并购能否成功的重要影响因素，但现有研究结论尚存在较大分歧。针对这一现象，本文使用元分析的方法来检验并购双方所属国家间的距离（包括文化距离、制度距离、地理距离和经济距离）对跨国并购绩效（包括跨国并购宣告时市场反应、跨国并购完成与否和跨国并购长期绩效）的影响，并考虑了国家间距离的“方向性”和“时间性”。通过对44篇独立的实证文献进行元分析后，本文发现：（1）从整体效应来看，国家间距离对跨国并购绩效产生负向影响。（2）当并购方来自新兴市场时，国家间距离对跨国并购绩效的负向影响更为显著。（3）从时间上看，对2008年之前的跨国并购来说，国家间距离对跨国并购绩效的负向影响更加显著。基于元分析的结果，本文系统地分析了国家间距离对跨国并购绩效的影响，并且讨论了未来研究的方向。
距离产生美感还是隔阂？国家间距离与跨国并购绩效的元分析
摘要
参考文献
1 贾镜渝, 李文. 距离、战略动机与中国企业跨国并购成败——基于制度和跳板理论[J]. 南开管理评论,2016, (6): 122-132. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2016.06.013
2 刘璐, 杨蕙馨, 崔恺媛. 文化距离、母公司能力与跨国并购绩效研究——基于中国上市公司跨国并购样本的实证研究[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019, (4): 55-64. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9839.2019.04.013
3 Boateng A, Du M, Bi X G, et al. Cultural distance and value creation of cross-border M&A: The moderating role of acquirer characteristics[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis,2019, 63: 285-295. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.009
4 Cheng C, Yang M. Enhancing performance of cross-border mergers and acquisitions in developed markets: The role of business ties and technological innovation capability[J]. Journal of Business Research,2017, 81: 107-117. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.019
5 Cho H, Ahn H S. Stock payment and the effects of institutional and cultural differences: A study of shareholder value creation in cross-border M&As[J]. International Business Review,2017, 26(3): 461-475. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.10.004
6 Dikova D, Panibratov A, Veselova A. Investment motives, ownership advantages and institutional distance: An examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions[J]. International Business Review,2019, 28(4): 625-637. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.007
7 Dong L, Li X, McDonald F, et al. Distance and the completion of Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitions[J]. Baltic Journal of Management,2019, 14(3): 500-519. DOI:10.1108/BJM-06-2018-0223
8 Ellis J A, Moeller S B, Schlingemann F P, et al. Portable country governance and cross-border acquisitions[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2017, 48(2): 148-173. DOI:10.1057/s41267-016-0029-9
9 Han S H, Jo E J, Kim D K, et al. Trade networks and cross-border acquisitions: Evidence from United States acquiring firms[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies,2016, 45(6): 916-943. DOI:10.1111/ajfs.12158
10 Huang Z, Zhu H S, Brass D J. Cross-border acquisitions and the asymmetric effect of power distance value difference on long-term post-acquisition performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2017, 38(4): 972-991. DOI:10.1002/smj.2530
11 Lim M H, Lee J H. National economic disparity and cross-border acquisition resolution[J]. International Business Review,2017, 26(2): 354-364. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.004
12 Liou R S, Rao-Nicholson R. Out of Africa: The role of institutional distance and host-home colonial tie in South African Firms’ post-acquisition performance in developed economies[J]. International Business Review,2017, 26(6): 1184-1195. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.010
13 Liou R S, Rao-Nicholson R. Age matters: The contingency of economic distance and economic freedom in emerging market firm’s cross-border M&A performance[J]. Management International Review,2019, 59(3): 355-386. DOI:10.1007/s11575-019-00381-y
引用本文
乔璐, 赵广庆, 吴剑峰. 距离产生美感还是隔阂？国家间距离与跨国并购绩效的元分析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(12): 119-133.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：失败情境下创业韧性的研究框架构建
