7596 
10097近年来国际银行的不当行为问题受到各国监管机构日趋严格的审查。文章界定了不当行为风险的定义，分析了国际银行行为成本的表现以及不当行为风险对金融稳定的影响。研究发现，不当行为风险的关注点在于消费者，在行为后果上强调行为本身带来的一系列负外部性；战略风险和声誉风险分别是不当行为风险的可能诱因及后果；操作风险、法律合规风险与不当行为风险既有联系又有区别；国际银行近年因不当行为所产生的成本已达到相当大的规模，行为成本可以大致作为银行伦理道德的衡量指标；不当行为风险及相关处罚还可能对金融稳定产生难以估量的影响。文章有益于中国银行业和监管层深化认识不当行为风险问题的严峻性，为行为成本概念的标准化、银行道德行为水平评估和判断不当行为风险防控是否有效提供参考依据，并通过该风险的治理以提高消费者福祉、防范系统性风险和维护金融稳定。
银行业不当行为风险、行为成本与金融稳定——全球金融行为监管和风险治理的焦点领域
摘要
参考文献
1 巴曙松, 朱元倩, 金玲玲, 等. 巴塞尔Ⅲ与金融监管大变革[M]. 北京: 中国金融出版社, 2015.
2 AlixPartners. Conduct risk and bank values: The benefits of a structured approach[EB/OL]. http://legacy.alixpartners.com/en/Publications/AllArticles/tabid/635/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/600/Conduct-Risk-Bank-Values.aspx#sthash.hEluOWoX.yzxofree.dpbs,2013.
3 Barclays. Barclays bank PLC annual report 2016[R]. London: Barclays Bank, 2016.
4 BCG. Global risk 2017: Staying the course in banking[R]. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group, 2017.
5 Benedict C. Will conduct costs change the behavior of banks?[J]. Moral Cents: The Journal of Ethics in Finance, 2014, 3（1）: 53–64.
6 CCP Research foundation. Conduct costs definition[EB/OL]. http://conductcosts.ccpresearchfoundation.com/conduct-costs-definition, 2014.
7 CCP Research Foundation. Conduct costs project report 2015[R]. Walton on Thames, Surrey: Conduct Costs Project Research Foundation, 2016.
8 Célérier C, Vallée B. The motives for financial complexity: An empirical investigation[R]. HEC Paris Research Paper No. FIN-2013-1013, 2014.
9 CFPB. CFPB supervision and examination manual （version 2）[R]. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2012.
10 ESAs. Joint position of the European supervisory authorities on manufacturers’ product oversight & governance processes[R]. European Supervisory Authorities, 2013.
11 ESRB. Report on misconduct risk in the banking sector[R]. Frankfurt am Main: European Systemic Risk Board, 2015.
12 FSA. Retail conduct risk outlook 2011[R]. London: Financial Services Authority, 2011a.
13 FSA. The Financial Conduct Authority-approach to regulation[R]. London: Financial Services Authority, 2011b.
14 FSB. Thematic review on risk governance: Peer review report[R]. Basel: Financial Stability Board, 2013.
15 G30. Banking conduct and culture: A call for sustained and comprehensive reform[R]. Washington D C: Group of Thirty, 2015.
16 IAIS. Issues paper on conduct of business risk and its management[R]. International Association of Insurance Supervisors, 2015.
17 Karpoff J M, Lee D S, Martin G S. The cost to firms of cooking the books[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2008, 43（3）: 581–611. DOI:10.1017/S0022109000004221
18 Kemp M. Financial market conduct risk and financial stability[EB/OL]. http://www.nematrian.com/Docs/FinancialMarketConductRisk20150624.pdf, 2015-06-24.
19 Lloyds Banking Group. Help Britain prosper: Lloyds banking group annual report and accounts 2016[R]. London: Lloyds Banking Group, 2017.
20 Talley E L. Financial regulation and the world’s most important number: LIBOR reporting behavior during the credit crisis[R]. Working Paper, 2014: 1–38.
21 Thomson Reuters. Conduct risk report 2013[R]. Thomson Reuters, 2013.
22 UK. Financial services and markets: The financial services and markets act 2000 （Regulated Activities） （Amendment） （No. 2） order 2013[Z]. Uunited Kingdom Government Bill, 2013: 1–87.
引用本文
冯乾, 高洋. 银行业不当行为风险、行为成本与金融稳定——全球金融行为监管和风险治理的焦点领域[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2017, 19(4): 52–65.
导出参考文献，格式为：
