环境规制陷阱与技术进步方向转变效应检验
7482 
0
上海财经大学学报 2015 年 第 17 卷第 03 期, 页码：
摘要
参考文献
摘要
前沿研究关注环境规制对技术进步的激励作用，却普遍忽视环境规制与技术进步方向转变的非一致性。文章构建二阶段模型演绎环境规制与技术进步方向的作用机制，检验我国环境规制与技术进步方向关系、环境规制陷阱的存在性及技术进步方向转变的效果。研究表明：（1）环境规制存在陷阱，环境规制强度和清洁技术研发并非同向变化，仅当清洁技术创新满足激励相容约束时环境政策才能有效激发清洁技术研发。（2）环境规制与清洁技术吻合厚左U形关系，出现非同步性效应且多数地区处于U形左侧阶段。而这类环境规制与清洁技术创新的非同步性源于技术进步方向转变的门槛效应，只有当经济发展水平达到临界状态时，政策管制才可能转变技术进步方向，提升环境质量。
［1］董直庆，蔡啸，王林辉. 技术进步方向、城市用地规模和环境质量[J]. 经济研究，2014，(10).
[2]李斌，彭星，陈柱华. 环境规制、FDI 与中国治污技术创新——基于省际动态面板数据的分析[J]. 财经研究，2011，(10).
[3]李斌，彭星，欧阳铭珂. 环境规制、绿色全要素生产率与中国工业发展方式转变[J]. 中国工业经济，2013，（4）.
[4]宋马林，王舒鸿. 环境规制、技术进步与经济增长[J].经济研究，2013，（3）.
[5]许慧. 低碳经济发展与政府环境规制研究[J]. 财经问题研究，2014，（1）.
[6]张成，陆旸，郭路，于同申.环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J].经济研究，2011，（2）.
[7]张海洋. R&D两面性、外资活动与中国工业生产率增长[J]. 经济研究，2005，（5）.
[8]Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., et al. The Environment and Directed Technical Change[J]. American Economic Review,2012,102(1): 131-166.
[9]Aiken D.V., Fre R., Grosskopf S., et al. Pollution Abatement and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 44: 11-28.
[10]Ambec S., Barla P. A Theoretical Foundation of Porter Hypothesis[J]. Economic Letters,2002,75(3):355-360.
[11]Ambec S., Barla P. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business?[J]. An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis, Energy Studies Review,2006,14(2):42-62.
[12]Cesaroni F., Arduini R. Environmental Technology in the European Chemical Industry[R]. LEM Working Paper,2001.
[13]Conrad K., Wastl D.,The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Productivity in German Industries[J]. Empirical Economics,1995,20(4):615-633.
[14]Gollop F. M., Roberts M. J. Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth:The Case of FossilFueled Electric Power Generation[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1983,91:654-674.
[15]Hansen B. E. Threshold Effects in nondynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2): 345-368.
[16]Hartman R., Kwon O. Sustainable Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2005,29(10): 1701-1736.
[17]Johnstone N., Hacˇicˇ I., Popp D. Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence based on Patent Counts[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 45(1):133-155.
[18]Popp D., Newell R.G., Jaffe A.B. Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change[J]. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper Series, No.14832，2009.
[19]Porter M.E. America’s Green Strategy[J]. Scientific American,1991,268(4):168.
[20]Porter M.E., Van der Linde C.Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Economics Perspectives,1995,9: 97-118.
[2]李斌，彭星，陈柱华. 环境规制、FDI 与中国治污技术创新——基于省际动态面板数据的分析[J]. 财经研究，2011，(10).
[3]李斌，彭星，欧阳铭珂. 环境规制、绿色全要素生产率与中国工业发展方式转变[J]. 中国工业经济，2013，（4）.
[4]宋马林，王舒鸿. 环境规制、技术进步与经济增长[J].经济研究，2013，（3）.
[5]许慧. 低碳经济发展与政府环境规制研究[J]. 财经问题研究，2014，（1）.
[6]张成，陆旸，郭路，于同申.环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J].经济研究，2011，（2）.
[7]张海洋. R&D两面性、外资活动与中国工业生产率增长[J]. 经济研究，2005，（5）.
[8]Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., et al. The Environment and Directed Technical Change[J]. American Economic Review,2012,102(1): 131-166.
[9]Aiken D.V., Fre R., Grosskopf S., et al. Pollution Abatement and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 44: 11-28.
[10]Ambec S., Barla P. A Theoretical Foundation of Porter Hypothesis[J]. Economic Letters,2002,75(3):355-360.
[11]Ambec S., Barla P. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business?[J]. An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis, Energy Studies Review,2006,14(2):42-62.
[12]Cesaroni F., Arduini R. Environmental Technology in the European Chemical Industry[R]. LEM Working Paper,2001.
[13]Conrad K., Wastl D.,The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Productivity in German Industries[J]. Empirical Economics,1995,20(4):615-633.
[14]Gollop F. M., Roberts M. J. Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth:The Case of FossilFueled Electric Power Generation[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1983,91:654-674.
[15]Hansen B. E. Threshold Effects in nondynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2): 345-368.
[16]Hartman R., Kwon O. Sustainable Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2005,29(10): 1701-1736.
[17]Johnstone N., Hacˇicˇ I., Popp D. Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence based on Patent Counts[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 45(1):133-155.
[18]Popp D., Newell R.G., Jaffe A.B. Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change[J]. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper Series, No.14832，2009.
[19]Porter M.E. America’s Green Strategy[J]. Scientific American,1991,268(4):168.
[20]Porter M.E., Van der Linde C.Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Economics Perspectives,1995,9: 97-118.
引用本文
董直庆, 焦翠红, 王芳玲. 环境规制陷阱与技术进步方向转变效应检验[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2015, 17(3): 0.
导出参考文献，格式为：
