论管理学的现代主义遗产与后现代精神
5684 
642
外国经济与管理 2007 年 第 29 卷第 03 期, 页码：1 - 8
摘要
参考文献
摘要
对现代管理学仅有怀想是不够的,现代管理学既是历史,也是我们周遭的现实。而新世纪后现代管理学的新异表达,暗地里传播着种种关于历史、现实和未来的思想端绪和学术命题。在历史与现实中考察现代管理学留给我们的遗产,是为了清理我们的理路,以使我们超越不同视域的束缚,将这一命题向纵深挖掘。
[1]Douglas M McGregor.The human side of enterprise[J].The Management Review,1957,46(11):22-28.
[2]Peter F Drucker.Management challenges for the 2lst century[M].New York:Harper Press,1999.
[3]Mary Parker Follett.Dynamic administration:The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett[M].New York:Harper and BrothersPress,1941.
[4]Fred Luthans.The contingency theory of management:A path out of the jungle[J].Business Horizons,1973,16(6):67-72.
[5]Daniel A Wren.The evolution of management thought[M].4th Ed.,New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc.,2004.
[6]Immanuel Kant.What is enlightenment?[A].in Foundations of the metaphysics of morals[C].New York:Bobbs-Merrill,1784.
[7]Alfred Kieser.Rhetoric and myth in management fashion[J].Organization,1997,4(1):49-74.
[8]Gareth Morgan.Images of organizations[M].Beverly Hill,California:Sage Publications,1986.
[9]Raza Mir,and Andrew Wastson.Strategic management and philosophy of science:The cases for a constructivist methodology[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(9):941-953.
[10]Peter F Drucker.The practice of management[M].New York:Harper&Row,1976:Preface,3.
[11]Tom J Peters,and Robert Waterman.In search of excellence:Lessons from America’s best-run companies[M].New York:Harper&Row,1982.
[12]Tom J Peters.Tom Peters’s true confessions:On the 20th anniversary of In Search of Excellence[J].Fast Company,2001,12(53):78-81.
[13]Tom J Peters.Thriving on chaos:Handbook for management revolutions[M].New York:Alfred P.Knopf,1988.
[14]Tom J Peters.Re-imagine:Business excellence in a disruptive age[M].London:Dorling Kindersley,2003.
[15]Tom J Peters.Tom Peters essentials[M].London:Dorling Kindersley,2005.
[16]Robert Heller.Movers and shakers:The brains and bravado behind business[M].London:Bloomsbury Publishing,2003.
[17]Robert Cooper,and Gibson Burrell.Modernism,postmodernism and organizational analysis:An introduction[J].Organization Stud-ies,1988,9(1):91-112.
[18]Peter F Drucker.Landmarks of tomorrow:A report on the new“post-modern”world[M].New York:Harper&Row,1959.
①硬核(hardcore)是拉卡托斯方法论中的一个术语,代表团结一个科学研究框架的领导者们的纯属形而上学的信仰;环绕硬核是可检验理论的“保护带”(protective belt)、辅助性假说(auxiliary hypothesis)和初始条件(initial condition)。参见Imre Lakatos.History of sci-ence and its rational reconstruction[A].in R S Cohen,and C R Buck(Eds.).Boston studies in philosophy of science(Vol.8)[C].Dordrecht,Holland:PSA/Reidel,1971:91-136.
②sapere aude!是一句拉丁语,可以翻译为“敢于显示智慧”或“敢于运用自己的理性”,它是由德国伟大哲学家伊曼纽尔.康德在其《什么是启蒙运动?》(1784)著名论文中提出来的,是启蒙运动的战斗口号。
③按照法国后现代哲学家雅克.德里达(Jacques Derrida)的说法,“解构”并不意味着“摧毁”,而不过是一种“阐释策略”。美国北伊利诺斯大学教授芭芭拉.约翰森(Johnson,1987)认为,“解构”这个词本身就象征着这么一种另类逻辑,因为它既不是建构也不是拆毁。参见:Jacques Derrida.Dissemination[M].translated by Barbara Johnson.Chicago,Illinois:The University of Chicago Press,1981:207.Barbara Johnson.Nothing fails like success[A].in Barbara Johnson(Ed.).A world of difference[C].Baltimore and London:Johns Hopkins University Press,1987:11-16.
[2]Peter F Drucker.Management challenges for the 2lst century[M].New York:Harper Press,1999.
[3]Mary Parker Follett.Dynamic administration:The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett[M].New York:Harper and BrothersPress,1941.
[4]Fred Luthans.The contingency theory of management:A path out of the jungle[J].Business Horizons,1973,16(6):67-72.
[5]Daniel A Wren.The evolution of management thought[M].4th Ed.,New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc.,2004.
[6]Immanuel Kant.What is enlightenment?[A].in Foundations of the metaphysics of morals[C].New York:Bobbs-Merrill,1784.
[7]Alfred Kieser.Rhetoric and myth in management fashion[J].Organization,1997,4(1):49-74.
[8]Gareth Morgan.Images of organizations[M].Beverly Hill,California:Sage Publications,1986.
[9]Raza Mir,and Andrew Wastson.Strategic management and philosophy of science:The cases for a constructivist methodology[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(9):941-953.
[10]Peter F Drucker.The practice of management[M].New York:Harper&Row,1976:Preface,3.
[11]Tom J Peters,and Robert Waterman.In search of excellence:Lessons from America’s best-run companies[M].New York:Harper&Row,1982.
[12]Tom J Peters.Tom Peters’s true confessions:On the 20th anniversary of In Search of Excellence[J].Fast Company,2001,12(53):78-81.
[13]Tom J Peters.Thriving on chaos:Handbook for management revolutions[M].New York:Alfred P.Knopf,1988.
[14]Tom J Peters.Re-imagine:Business excellence in a disruptive age[M].London:Dorling Kindersley,2003.
[15]Tom J Peters.Tom Peters essentials[M].London:Dorling Kindersley,2005.
[16]Robert Heller.Movers and shakers:The brains and bravado behind business[M].London:Bloomsbury Publishing,2003.
[17]Robert Cooper,and Gibson Burrell.Modernism,postmodernism and organizational analysis:An introduction[J].Organization Stud-ies,1988,9(1):91-112.
[18]Peter F Drucker.Landmarks of tomorrow:A report on the new“post-modern”world[M].New York:Harper&Row,1959.
①硬核(hardcore)是拉卡托斯方法论中的一个术语,代表团结一个科学研究框架的领导者们的纯属形而上学的信仰;环绕硬核是可检验理论的“保护带”(protective belt)、辅助性假说(auxiliary hypothesis)和初始条件(initial condition)。参见Imre Lakatos.History of sci-ence and its rational reconstruction[A].in R S Cohen,and C R Buck(Eds.).Boston studies in philosophy of science(Vol.8)[C].Dordrecht,Holland:PSA/Reidel,1971:91-136.
②sapere aude!是一句拉丁语,可以翻译为“敢于显示智慧”或“敢于运用自己的理性”,它是由德国伟大哲学家伊曼纽尔.康德在其《什么是启蒙运动?》(1784)著名论文中提出来的,是启蒙运动的战斗口号。
③按照法国后现代哲学家雅克.德里达(Jacques Derrida)的说法,“解构”并不意味着“摧毁”,而不过是一种“阐释策略”。美国北伊利诺斯大学教授芭芭拉.约翰森(Johnson,1987)认为,“解构”这个词本身就象征着这么一种另类逻辑,因为它既不是建构也不是拆毁。参见:Jacques Derrida.Dissemination[M].translated by Barbara Johnson.Chicago,Illinois:The University of Chicago Press,1981:207.Barbara Johnson.Nothing fails like success[A].in Barbara Johnson(Ed.).A world of difference[C].Baltimore and London:Johns Hopkins University Press,1987:11-16.
引用本文
罗珉. 论管理学的现代主义遗产与后现代精神[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2007, 29(3): 1–8.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：公司债券“信用价差之谜”探析
下一篇：客户化企业组织范式探析
