有趣性:管理研究的新策略
5774 
407
外国经济与管理 2014 年 第 36 卷第 05 期, 页码：61 - 68
摘要
参考文献
摘要
本文剖析了Davis关于有趣性胜于真实性的研究策略未获管理学界重视的成因,然后以Davis理论为基础,结合管理研究中的两个特质(竞争研究者的作用,有趣性并非仅限于否定假设),构建了一个有趣性管理研究策略的"三角"框架,以此将有趣性管理研究策略定义为在一定背景下识别冲突、解决冲突和传递解决方案的动态过程,再据此识别出由五类冲突获取有趣性研究问题的方式,并梳理出有趣性地表达研究成果的做法。
[1]Alvesson M and Sandberg J.Generating research questions through problematization[J].The Academy of Management Review,2011,36(2):247-271.
[2]Argyris C.On organization learning[M].Oxford:Blackwell Publishers Ltd,1994.
[3]Bartunek J M,et al.What makes management research interesting,and why does it matter[J]Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):9-15.
[4]Booth W C,et al.The craft of research[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,2003.
[5]Davis M S.That’s interesting!Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology[J].Philosophy of the Social Sciences,1971,1(2):309-344.
[6]Davis M S.That’s classic!The phenomenology and rhetoric of successful social theories[J].Philosophy of the Social Sciences,1986,16(3):285-301.
[7]Fulmer I S.The craft of writing theory articles-variety and similarity in AMR[J].The Academy of Management Review,2012,37(3):327-331.
[8]Gilbert C G and Christensen C M.Anomaly seeking research:Thirty years of development in resource allocation theory[A].In Bower J L and Gilbert C G(Eds.).From resource allocation to strategy[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005:71-90.
[9]Kaplan R S.Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard[J].Handbooks of Management Accounting Research,2008,(3):1253-1269.
[10]Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1962.
[11]Nonaka I and Toyama R.The knowledge-creating theory revisited:Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process[J].Knowledge Management Research&Practice,2003,(1):2-10.
[12]Porter M E.The five competitive forces that shape strategy[J].Harvard Business Review,2008,86(1):2-17.
[13]Rogers E M.Diffusion of innovations(4th)[M].Cambridge:The Free Press,2002.
[14]Rynes S L.From the editors:Some reflections on contribution[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(2):311-313.
[15]Schn D A.The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice[J].Journal of Interprofessional Care,1992,6(1):49-63.
[16]Scott P M and Van de Ven A H.Using aparadox to build management and organization theories[J].The Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):562-578.
[17]Smith K G and Hitt M A.Great minds in management:The process of theory development[M].London:Oxford University Press,2005.
[18]Tsui A S,et al.What to study in ChinaChoosing and crafting important research questions[J].Management and Organization Review,2007,3(2):171-181.
[19]陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
①这里的interesting并非日常用语中简单的“有趣”含义,更多地是指能让人产生意料之外与情理之中相结合的一种奇妙之感,对此,学者们的翻译基本一致,如陈昭全和张志学在陈晓萍等编的《组织与管理研究的实证方法》中译为“有趣性”(2008:69),徐飞、路琳在译著《管理学中的伟大思想》中译为“有趣”(2005:289),徐淑英在其讲座《中国管理研究的严谨性与实用性:情境化的作用》中译为“有意思”。本文使用未必准确的“有趣性”一词,既有与这些看法保持一致的考虑,更主要的是没有找到恰当的词句,多少有些无奈。
①AMR2001年到2010年评选出的年度最佳论文的标题分别是:“构建更好的理论:因时因地制宜”(2001)、“社会资本:一个新概念的展望”(2002)、“开发、探索和过程管理:对生产能力困境的回顾”(2003)、“交易系统”(2004)、“经济学语言及假设:理论如何才能自洽”(2005)、“制度性阻碍与变革的认知基础:一个框架性视角”(2006)、“直觉及其在决策中的作用探索”(2007)、“管理创新”(2008)、“市场与科层制度:混合治理形式下的激励制度理论”(2009)、“‘盗火’:新思想演变中的创新性逆变”(2010)。它们的原名见参考文献[7]的参考文献。
[2]Argyris C.On organization learning[M].Oxford:Blackwell Publishers Ltd,1994.
[3]Bartunek J M,et al.What makes management research interesting,and why does it matter[J]Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):9-15.
[4]Booth W C,et al.The craft of research[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,2003.
[5]Davis M S.That’s interesting!Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology[J].Philosophy of the Social Sciences,1971,1(2):309-344.
[6]Davis M S.That’s classic!The phenomenology and rhetoric of successful social theories[J].Philosophy of the Social Sciences,1986,16(3):285-301.
[7]Fulmer I S.The craft of writing theory articles-variety and similarity in AMR[J].The Academy of Management Review,2012,37(3):327-331.
[8]Gilbert C G and Christensen C M.Anomaly seeking research:Thirty years of development in resource allocation theory[A].In Bower J L and Gilbert C G(Eds.).From resource allocation to strategy[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005:71-90.
[9]Kaplan R S.Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard[J].Handbooks of Management Accounting Research,2008,(3):1253-1269.
[10]Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1962.
[11]Nonaka I and Toyama R.The knowledge-creating theory revisited:Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process[J].Knowledge Management Research&Practice,2003,(1):2-10.
[12]Porter M E.The five competitive forces that shape strategy[J].Harvard Business Review,2008,86(1):2-17.
[13]Rogers E M.Diffusion of innovations(4th)[M].Cambridge:The Free Press,2002.
[14]Rynes S L.From the editors:Some reflections on contribution[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(2):311-313.
[15]Schn D A.The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice[J].Journal of Interprofessional Care,1992,6(1):49-63.
[16]Scott P M and Van de Ven A H.Using aparadox to build management and organization theories[J].The Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):562-578.
[17]Smith K G and Hitt M A.Great minds in management:The process of theory development[M].London:Oxford University Press,2005.
[18]Tsui A S,et al.What to study in ChinaChoosing and crafting important research questions[J].Management and Organization Review,2007,3(2):171-181.
[19]陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
①这里的interesting并非日常用语中简单的“有趣”含义,更多地是指能让人产生意料之外与情理之中相结合的一种奇妙之感,对此,学者们的翻译基本一致,如陈昭全和张志学在陈晓萍等编的《组织与管理研究的实证方法》中译为“有趣性”(2008:69),徐飞、路琳在译著《管理学中的伟大思想》中译为“有趣”(2005:289),徐淑英在其讲座《中国管理研究的严谨性与实用性:情境化的作用》中译为“有意思”。本文使用未必准确的“有趣性”一词,既有与这些看法保持一致的考虑,更主要的是没有找到恰当的词句,多少有些无奈。
①AMR2001年到2010年评选出的年度最佳论文的标题分别是:“构建更好的理论:因时因地制宜”(2001)、“社会资本:一个新概念的展望”(2002)、“开发、探索和过程管理:对生产能力困境的回顾”(2003)、“交易系统”(2004)、“经济学语言及假设:理论如何才能自洽”(2005)、“制度性阻碍与变革的认知基础:一个框架性视角”(2006)、“直觉及其在决策中的作用探索”(2007)、“管理创新”(2008)、“市场与科层制度:混合治理形式下的激励制度理论”(2009)、“‘盗火’:新思想演变中的创新性逆变”(2010)。它们的原名见参考文献[7]的参考文献。
引用本文
白胜. 有趣性:管理研究的新策略[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2014, 36(5): 61–68.
导出参考文献，格式为：
