3100 
3722组织公正动态研究关注公正相关变量随着时间推移自身的变化、变化的触发因素，以及变化的影响。本文总结了组织公正领域在实施者视角、接受者视角以及旁观者视角的动态研究现状，得到以下结论：实施者的动态研究大多使用个体视角的理论，更多关注的是互动公正；接受者的动态研究更多关注触发因素，并且研究周期更长；旁观者视角的动态研究由于其不直接涉入具体的公正事件，因此要考虑这一特殊性等。除此之外，本文还发现个体间和个体内差异化效应尚未得到重视；现有研究大都仅使用基于间隔的数据收集方式，却忽视掉基于事件和信号的数据收集方式。基于以上发现，本文提出了发展旁观者视角及横跨多个领域和视角的研究、构建个体内和个体间差异化效应以及发展中国情境的组织公正动态研究等方面的建议和可行方向。
组织公正动态研究述评
摘要
参考文献
3 Brockner J, Wiesenfeld B M, Siegel P A, et al. Riding the fifth wave: Organizational justice as dependent variable[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,2015, 35: 103-121. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.002
4 Colquitt J A, Long D M, Rodell J B, et al. Adding the "in" to justice: A qualitative and quantitative investigation of the differential effects of justice rule adherence and violation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(2): 278-297. DOI:10.1037/a0038131
5 Ferris D L, Spence J R, Brown D J, et al. Interpersonal injustice and workplace deviance: The role of esteem threat[J]. Journal of Management,2012, 38(6): 1788-1811. DOI:10.1177/0149206310372259
6 Guo J. The formation and change of overall justice perceptions: Consideration of time, events, and affect[D]. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012: 1-20.
7 Hausknecht J P, Sturman M C, Roberson Q M. Justice as a dynamic construct: Effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2011, 96(4): 872-880. DOI:10.1037/a0022991
8 Holtz B C, Harold C M. Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2009, 94(5): 1185-1199. DOI:10.1037/a0015900
9 Johnson R E, Lanaj K, Barnes C M. The good and bad of being fair: Effects of procedural and interpersonal justice behaviors on regulatory resources[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2014, 99(4): 635-650. DOI:10.1037/a0035647
10 Koopman J, Lin S H, Lennard A C, et al. My coworkers are treated more fairly than me! A self-regulatory perspective on justice social comparisons[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2020, 63(3): 857-880. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0586
11 Lilly J D, Virick M, Hadani M. The dynamic nature of justice: Influential effects of time and work outcomes on long-term perceptions of justice[J]. Social Justice Research,2010, 23(1): 37-59. DOI:10.1007/s11211-010-0107-2
12 Loi R, Yang J X, Diefendorff J M. Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: A multilevel investigation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2009, 94(3): 770-781. DOI:10.1037/a0015714
13 Matta F K, Erol-Korkmaz H T, Johnson R E, et al. Significant work events and counterproductive work behavior: The role of fairness, emotions, and emotion regulation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2014, 35(7): 920-944. DOI:10.1002/job.1934
14 Matta F K, Sabey T B, Scott B A, et al. Not all fairness is created equal: A study of employee attributions of supervisor justice motives[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2020, 105(3): 274-293. DOI:10.1037/apl0000440
15 Matta F K, Scott B A, Colquitt J A, et al. Is consistently unfair better than sporadically fair? An investigation of justice variability and stress[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017, 60(2): 743-770. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0455
17 McClean S T, Barnes C M, Courtright S H, et al. Resetting the clock on dynamic leader behaviors: A conceptual integration and agenda for future research[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2019, 13(2): 479-508. DOI:10.5465/annals.2017.0081
18 Newton D W, LePine J A, Kim J K, et al. Taking engagement to task: The nature and functioning of task engagement across transitions[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2020, 105(1): 1-18. DOI:10.1037/apl0000428
19 O’Reilly J, Aquino K, Skarlicki D P. The lives of others: Third parties' responses to others' injustice[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2016, 101(2): 171-189. DOI:10.1037/apl0000040
20 Oc B, Bashshur M R, Moore C. Speaking truth to power: The effect of candid feedback on how individuals with power allocate resources[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(2): 450-463. DOI:10.1037/a0038138
21 Park S, Sturman M C, Vanderpool C, et al. Only time will tell: The changing relationships between LMX, job performance, and justice[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(3): 660-680. DOI:10.1037/a0038907
22 Qin X, Huang M P, Johnson R E, et al. The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(5): 1951-1975. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.1325
23 Qin X, Ren R, Zhang Z X, et al. Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: Inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(3): 749-766. DOI:10.1037/a0038084
24 Reb J, Goldman B M, Kray L J, et al. Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice[J]. Personnel Psychology,2006, 59(1): 31-64. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00773.x
26 Rupp D E, Shapiro D L, Folger R, et al. A critical analysis of the conceptualization and measurement of organizational justice: Is it time for reassessment?[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2017, 11(2): 919-959. DOI:10.5465/annals.2014.0051
27 Scott B A, Garza A S, Conlon D E, et al. Why do managers act fairly in the first place? A daily investigation of "hot" and "cold" motives and discretion[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2014, 57(6): 1571-1591. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0644
28 Sherf E N, Venkataramani V, Gajendran R S. Too busy to be fair? The effect of workload and rewards on managers' justice rule adherence[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2019, 62(2): 469-502. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.1061
29 Shipp A J, Cole M S. Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn't it exploited more often?[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2015, 2: 237-260. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111245
30 Tsui A S, Jia L D. Calling for humanistic scholarship in China[J]. Management and Organization Review,2013, 9(1): 1-15. DOI:10.1111/more.12013
31 Wang Y R, Ford M T, Wang Y X, et al. Shifts and variability in daily interpersonal justice are associated with psychological detachment and affect at home[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2019, 115: 103307. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.004
32 Yang J X, Diefendorff J M. The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong[J]. Personnel Psychology,2009, 62(2): 259-295. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01138.x
33 Zapata C P, Carton A M, Liu J T. When justice promotes injustice: Why minority leaders experience bias when they adhere to interpersonal justice rules[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(4): 1150-1173. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0275
引用本文
刘德鹏, 高晗, 高翔宇, 等. 组织公正动态研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(4): 120-136.
导出参考文献，格式为：
