11060 
6475混合所有制与公私合作制改革是推动市场决定性作用得以发挥的“一体两翼”，二者分别着力于特殊行业和公共事业，分别落实市场的深度和广度，拓展非公资本的投资和经营范围。当前市场准入法律制度不能与改革需求相配套：在混合所有制改革所专注的特殊行业，存在对非公资本的显性准入壁垒；在公私合作制改革所聚焦的公共事业，非公资本则一直面临着隐形准入障碍。未来我国的市场准入法律制度体系应当对这一局面进行改革：一方面，以“规制放松”为主要形式对若干领域进行准入规制的卸载式改革，促使若干行业的准入壁垒降低、投资主体多元、市场竞争结构优化，竞争活力提高；另一方面，在拓展非公资本投资准入的同时，进行政府规制法律制度的结构性调整，即“规制再造”，保证在非公资本进入若干特殊领域时仍能使公共利益不受减损。
混合所有制、公私合作制及市场准入法的改革论纲
摘要
参考文献
1.0 Ogus A I. Regulation: Legal form and economic theory [M]. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.
2.0 Breyer S. Regulation and its reform [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
3.0 Sokol D D. Limiting Anti-Competitive government interventions that benefit special interests [J]. George Mason Law Review, 2009, 17（1）: 119–189.
4.0 Gal M S, Faibish I. Six principles for limiting government-facilitated restraints on competition [J]. Common Market Law Review, 2007, 44（1） : 69–100.
5.0 Cooper J C, Pautler P A, Zywicki T J. Theory and practice of competition advocacy at the FTC[J]. Antitrust Law Journal, 2005, 72（3）: 1091–1112.
6.0 Johannsen K S. Regulatory independence in theory and practice: A survey of independent energy regulators in Eight European Countries[J]. Energy Research Programme and the Danish Research Training Council, 2003, （2）: 156–162.
7.0 Owen B M, Sun S, Zheng W T. Antitrust in China: The problem of incentive compatibility[J]. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2005, 1（1）: 123–148.
8.0 Brooks S. The mixed ownership corporation as an instrument of public policy[J]. Comparative Politics, 1987, 19（2）: 173–191. DOI:10.2307/421797
9.0 Beladi H, Chao C C. Mixed ownership, unemployment, and welfare for a developing economy[J]. Review of Development Economics, 2006, 10（4）: 604–611. DOI:10.1111/rode.2006.10.issue-4
引用本文
刘大洪, 段宏磊. 混合所有制、公私合作制及市场准入法的改革论纲[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2017, 19(5): 91–102.
导出参考文献，格式为：
