, 2
10300 
8711近年来技术多元化研究一直都是探讨技术多元化与企业绩效关系，忽略了技术多元化对不同类型技术创新能力的影响。本文基于组织学习理论，探索技术多元化对企业双元技术创新能力的不同作用。采用2007—2010年568家中国主板上市公司数据的负二项回归结果表明，企业技术多元化能够有效促进探索式创新和利用式创新能力，并且技术多元化对探索式创新的促进作用要大于对利用式创新的促进作用。我们还发现，行业跟风研发创新的竞争互动是影响技术多元化与双元创新能力关系的重要情境因素。企业所在行业跟风研发创新的竞争互动越频繁，越有利于技术多元化的企业培养利用式创新能力，却不利于对探索式创新能力的培养。实证研究结果表明企业在采用技术多元化战略培养双元创新能力时，既要注重利用多元化的技术知识库来实现双元创新能力之间的平衡，又要考虑跟风研发创新的行业竞争互动造成的影响。
技术多元化、行业竞争互动与双元创新能力
摘要
参考文献
4 徐露允, 曾德明, 李健. 知识网络中心势、知识多元化对企业二元式创新绩效的影响[J]. 管理学报,2017, (2): 221-228 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2017.02.008
5 杨震宁, 李东红, 马振中. 关系资本、锁定效应与中国制造业企业创新[J]. 科研管理,2013, (11): 42-52 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2995.2013.11.006
6 曾德明, 孙佳, 戴海闻. 技术多元化、技术距离与企业二元式创新: 以中国汽车产业为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2015, (17): 61-66 DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2015050585
9 Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy,2003, 32(1): 69-87 DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
10 Bulow J, Geanakoplos J, Klemperer P. Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1985, 93(3): 488-511 DOI:10.1086/261312
11 Cardinal L B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development[J]. Organization Science,2001, 12(1): 19-36 DOI:10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119
12 Carnabuci G, Operti E. Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2013, 34(13): 1591-1613 DOI:10.1002/smj.2013.34.issue-13
13 Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1984, 29(1): 52-73 DOI:10.2307/2393080
14 Guan J C, Liu N. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J]. Research Policy,2016, 45(1): 97-112 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.002
15 He Z, Tong T, He W, et al. Chinese patent database user documentation: Matching SIPO patents to Chinese publicly-listed companies and subsidiaries[J]. User Documentation, Chinese Patent Data Project September,2013
16 Huyghebaert N, Van de Gucht L M. Incumbent strategic behavior in financial markets and the exit of entrepreneurial start-ups[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004, 25(7): 669-688 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
17 Patel P, Pavitt K. The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety[J]. Research Policy,1997, 26(2): 141-156 DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
18 Quintana-García C, Benavides-Velasco C A. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification[J]. Research Policy,2008, 37(3): 492-507 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002
19 Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001, 22(4): 287-306 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
20 Sampson R C. R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(2): 364-386 DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.24634443
21 Sundaram A K, John T A, John K. An empirical analysis of strategic competition and firm values the case of R&D competition[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1996, 40(3): 459-486 DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00853-7
23 Wang Q, von Tunzelmann N. Complexity and the functions of the firm: Breadth and depth[J]. Research Policy,2000, 29(7-8): 805-818 DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00106-2
24 Wuyts S, Dutta S, Stremersch S. Portfolios of interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets: Consequences for innovation and profitability[J]. Journal of Marketing,2004, 68(2): 88-100 DOI:10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787
引用本文
张庆垒, 施建军, 刘春林, 等. 技术多元化、行业竞争互动与双元创新能力[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(9): 71-83.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：管理者过度自信：研究述评与展望
