6708 
7940At present, more and more management researchers and practitioners feel a huge gap exists between management theory and practice. On the basis of discussing the relationship between theory （" knowledge”） and practice （" action”）, this paper analyzes the reasons for the separation of theory and practice, and points out the two dilemmas of " only knowledge but no action” and " actions still need knowledge”. Meanwhile, based on the path analysis of the management research roads of Drucker and March, this paper believes that the roads of Drucker and March can be integrated, and a third road of eliminating the huge gap between management theory and practice can be realized, that is, to manage the " integration of knowledge and action” in academic research. In addition, relying on the principle of yin-yang balance, this paper proposes to improve the " integration of knowledge and action” of academic research by reconstructing the study paradigm, reconstructing evaluation criteria, reshaping application-oriented business schools, and consolidating philosophical foundations. Based on the coupling analysis of asymmetric dynamics of practice and theory, this paper advocates a " co-engaged research” which needs to be focused on.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
The Way of “Integration of Knowledge and Action” in Academic Research Management: Combining the Distinctive Paths of Drucker and March
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 12, pp. 28 - 45 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.12.002
Summary
References
Summary
[1]Chen, C. H. (2017). Bridging the Gaps between Management Research and Management Practice (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management, 10, 1421-1425.
[2]Chen, C. H., Ma, S. H. (2017). Discussion on the Research Path of Chinese Indigenous Management Research: From the Perspective of Practical Theory (in Chinese). Management World, 11, 158-169.
[3]Chen, W. R. (2017). Extending the Boundary of Management Scholars (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management, 8, 1130-1133.
[4]Li, P. P. (2010). Chinese Indigenous Management Research: Concept Definition and Paradigm Design (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management, 7(5), 633-642.
[5]Li, P. P. (2013). Chinese Indigenous Management Research and Chinese Traditional Philosophy (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management, 10(9), 1249-1261.
[6]Li, P. P. (2016a). March, the Top Management Guru after Drucker: The Profound Significance of March’s Unique Thought System (in Chinese). Tsinghua Business Review, 05, 40-45/39.
[7]Li, P. P. (2016b). The Uncertain Times Call for “Irrationality”: Wick’s Thought Meets Taoist Philosophy Unexpectedly (in Chinese). Tsinghua Business Review, 11, 75-81.
[8]Li, P. P., Yang, M. (2017). Drucker’s Letter and Its Comments (in Chinese). Foreign Economics & Management, 06, 3-11/38.
[9]Luo, J. N. (2010). Practical Orientation and Theoretical Framework of Chinese Indigenous Management Research: A Holographic Structure of Organizational Management System. Chinese Journal of Management, 7(11), 1646-1670.
[10]Mintzberg, H., Shen, W. G. (2003). Yin-yang in Management (in Chinese). CEO and CIO, 11, 86-87/89.
[11]Wang, X., Li, P. P., & Bi, Z. H. (in press). The Future of Business School: The Integration of Knowledge and Practice (in Chinese). Foreign Economics & Management.
[12]Xi, Y. M., Zhang, X. J. (2017). Value and Paradigm of Management Research: From the Perspective of Practitioner (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management, 14(3), 335-338.
[13]Eiichi, S. (1916). Analects of Confucius and Abacus (in Chinese). Translated by Li, J. Z. in 2012. Beijing: China Youth Publishing House.
[14]Tsui, A. S. (2016, z1). Values and Ethics of Business Schools: Doing Responsible Scholarship (in Chinese). Quarterly Journal of Management, 1-23.
[15] Aguinis H, Vandenberg R J. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: Improving research quality before data collection[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2014, 1(1): 569-595.
[16] Aguinis H, Shapiro D L, Antonacopoulou E P, Cummings, T G. Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2014, 13(4): 623-639.
[17] Augier, M., & March, J. G. (2007). The pursuit of relevance in management education. California Management Review, 49(3), 129-146.
[18] Baldvinsdottir, G., Mitchell, F., & Nørreklit, H. (2010). Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 79-82.
[19] Banks G C, Pollack J M, Bochantin J E, Kirkman B L, Whelpley C E, O’boyle E H. Management’s science–practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(6): 2205-2231.
[20] Bansal P, Bertels S, Ewart T, Mac Connachie P, O’Brien J. Bridging the research–practice gap[J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2012, 26: 73–92
[21] Bartunek J M, Rynes S L. The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: What's in them and what might they offer? [J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2010, 9(1): 100-117.
[22] Bartunek J M, Rynes S L. Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40:1181–1201.
[23] Bergh D D, Perry J, Hanke R. Some predictors of SMJ article impact[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(1): 81-100.
[24] Bourdieu P. The Logic of Practice[M]. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
[25] Brennan R, Ankers P. In search of relevance: Is there an academic-practitioner divide in business-to-business marketing? [J]. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2004, 22(5):511-519.
[26] Cascio W F, Aguinis H. Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(5): 1062–1081.
[27] Colquitt J A. From the editors: The next three years at AMJ—Maintaining the mission while expanding the Journal[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54: 9–14.
[28] Donham W B. Essential groundwork for a broad executive theory[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1922, 1(1): 1-10.
[29] Drucker P. The Future of Industrial Man[M]. New York: Routledge, 1942/1995.
[30] Duncan W J. Management Theory and the practice of management. Business Horizons, 1974, 17(5): 48-52.
[31] Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison[M]. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.
[32] Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2005, 4(1): 75-91.
[33] Gibbons M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies[M]. Sage, 1994.
[34] Giddens A. The Constitution of Society[M]. Cambridge: Polity, 1984.
[35] Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. E. (1959). Higher education for business. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
[36] Grey, C. (2001). Re-imagining relevance: a response to Starkey and Madan. British Journal of Management, 12, S27-S32.
[37] Hambrick D C. What if the academy actually mattered? [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(1): 11-16.
[38] Heidegger M. Being and Time[M]. New York: Harper Perennial, 1927/2008.
[39] Judge T A, Cable D M, Colbert A E, et al. What causes a management article to be cited—Article, Author, or Journal? [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3): 491-506.
[40] Kieser A, Leiner L. Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(3): 516-533.
[41] Kieser A, Nicolai A, Seidl D. The Practical Relevance of Management Research: Turning the Debate on Relevance into a Rigorous Scientific Research Program[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2015, 9(1):143-233.
[42] Lewis M W. Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(4):760-776.
[43] Li P P. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach[J]. Organization Studies, 1998, 19(5): 829-861.
[44] Li P P. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2012, 29(4): 849-872.
[45] Li P P. Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: how to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management[J]. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 2016, 23(1): 42-77.
[46] Li P P. The epistemology of Yin-Yang Balancing as the root of Chinese traditional culture[C]. In Spencer-Rodgers J & Peng K-P (Eds.), The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 (Chapter 2; in press).
[47] Lockett A, McWilliams A. The balance of trade between disciplines: do we effectively manage knowledge? [J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2005, 14(2): 139-150.
[48] Lüscher L S, Lewis M W. Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(2):221-240.
[49] Mintzberg H, Gosling J. Educating managers beyond borders[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2002, 1(1): 64-76.
[50] Nicolini D. Practice theory, work and organization: An introduction[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[51] Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Podsakoff N P, Bachrach D G. Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(4): 641-720.
[52] Pullins, E. B., Timonen, H., Kaski, T., & Holopainen, M. (2017). An investigation of the theory practice gap in professional sales. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(1), 17-38.
[53] Roux D J, Rogers K H, Biggs H C, et al. Bridging the Science–Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing[J]. Ecology & Society, 2006, 11(1):709-723.
[54] Schatzki T R, Knorr-Cetina K, Savigny E V. The Practice Turn In Contemporary Theory[M], Routledge: London, 2001.
[55] Simon, H. A. (1967). The business school a problem in organizational design. Journal of Management Studies, 4(1), 1-16.
[56] Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. (2007). Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 249-266.
[57] Splitter V, Seidl D. Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2011, 47(1): 98-120.
[58] Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Robertson, M., Newell, S., & Dopson, S. (2010). When policy meets practice: Colliding logics and the challenges of ‘mode 2’initiatives in the translation of academic knowledge. Organization Studies, 31(9-10), 1311-1340.
[59] Tranfield, D., & Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9(4), 341-353.
[60] Tsui A S. The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2013, 9(3): 375-394.
[61] Tushman M, O'Reilly III C. Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur's quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(4): 769-774.
[62] Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2012, 6(1): 285-336.
[63] Van de Ven A H. Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory[J]. Academy of management Review, 1989, 14(4): 486-489.
[64] Van de Ven A H. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[65] Van de Ven A H, Jing R. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2012, 8(1): 123-137.
[66] Van de Ven A H, Johnson P E. Knowledge for theory and practice[J]. Academy of management review, 2006, 31(4): 802-821.
[67] Whitley, R. (1984). The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science. Journal of Management Studies, 21(4), 369–390.
[68] Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.
Cite this article
Li Peter Ping, Yang Zhengyin, Chen Chunhua. The Way of “Integration of Knowledge and Action” in Academic Research Management: Combining the Distinctive Paths of Drucker and March[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(12): 28-45.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
