4974 
6913In recent years, the impact of economic policies, including national industrial policies, on innovation activities of micro-enterprise has increasingly become a focus of attention in the academic community. In innovation investment decisions, there are two key influencing factors: the basic motivation for allocating resources for innovation and the ability to obtain necessary financing tools （ Peneder, 2008）. The literature exploring the impact of industrial policies （as government incentives） and credit allocation （as a resource allocation mechanism in the market） on innovation efficiency mainly focuses on the following three aspects: First, research the impact of government supports on the effectiveness of R&D and innovation activities. Second, analyze the influence of certain market factors on the R&D innovation efficiency of the company. Third, analyze the impact of government supports on the economic consequences of R&D innovations. This article takes the samples of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies during the " 12th Five-Year Plan” period （2011−2015） as the inspection object, and examines the impact of industrial policies and credit allocation as an external factor on the efficiency of the company’s innovation, in order to test the interactive relevance among government policies, credit allocation and innovation output. Our research shares similarity to the above literature, while it has its own differences: First, our research focuses on the process part of innovation, not on the consequences. Second, our research perspective is to consider industrial subsidies and tax incentives as the industrial financial stimulation measures, and to consider credit availability mainly as a market allocation drive rather than as an incentive measure for industrial policy credits. Third, the existing studies have shown that: in countries with more developed stock markets, compared to the credit market, it is much easier to promote the innovation level of companies which have external financing constraints; and the development of credit markets seems to have hindered the level of innovation in industries with the above-mentioned characteristics （Po-Hsuan, et al., 2014）. Based on the above three considerations, we combine the analysis of industrial policies and credit allocation to reveal the regulatory effects of the interaction between government forces and market forces. The empirical results of this paper show that industrial policy, with the help of policy guidance and fiscal measures, stimulates the increase of patent output of enterprises with supports from industrial policies; and for enterprises with more external financing access, on the contrary, it will weaken the induced stimulatory effects of industrial policies （or showed a " U-shaped” relationship）. Further studies have shown that the mechanism of the above-mentioned regulatory effects is: there is a substitution effect between financial assistance and credit allocation. The conclusions of this paper provide the experience on how to coordinate the role of the government and market forces, and also have an important reference value for people to deeply understand the effects of industrial policies.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Industrial Policies, Credit Allocation and Innovation Efficiency
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 07, pp. 142 - 152,封三 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.07.011
Summary
References
Summary
[1]Chen D H, Li Z, Xin F. Industrial policy and corporate finance: Empirical evidence from China[C]. Proceedings of the China International Conference on Accounting and Finance Research, 2010. (In Chinese)
[2]Jiang G H, Rao P G. Macroeconomic policy and micro-enterprise behavior: Expanding new areas of accounting and financial research[J]. Accounting Research, 2011, (3): 10-21. (In Chinese)
[3]Jiang X B. Industrial policy during economic transition: Empirical analysis and prospect of China’s experience[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1996. (In Chinese)
[4]Li S M, Huang C, Shi X X. The influence of information advantage on corporate mergers and acquisitions: Based on the perspective of social network[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2015, (11): 141-155. (In Chinese)
[5]Li Y, Meng X Y, Wang Y P. Government R&D funding and enterprise technology innovation: Empirical analysis based on heterogeneity of multidimensional industry[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2014, (1): 33-41 . (In Chinese)
[6]Li W J, Li Y T. Does the industrial policy inspire the company to invest?[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2014, (5): 122-134. (In Chinese)
[7]Li W J, Zheng M N. Substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Effect of macro industrial policy on micro-enterprises innovation[J]. Economic Research, 2016, (4): 60-73. (In Chinese)
[8]Li Z D, Fan L H, Fei J H. First investment, later investment, or first investment and subsequent investment: Based on the analysis of China’s enterprise property rights system[J]. Accounting Research, 2012, (1): 43-51. (In Chinese)
[9]Luo Q, Xiao W B, Xia X P. Evidence of financing constraints or overinvestment: The investment-cashflow sensitivity of Chinese listed companies[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2007, (9): 103-110. (In Chinese)
[10]Lu Z F, Han F C. How do macroeconomic policies affect the economic effects of company cash holdings? Based on the dual perspective of product market and capital market[J]. Management World, 2013, (6): 43-60. (In Chinese)
[11]Ma G R, Liu M, Yang Enyan. Bank credit, credit crunch and corporate R&D[J]. Financial Research, 2014, (7): 76-93. (In Chinese)
[12]Ni R R, Zhu Y J. Labor protection, labor intensity, and corporate innovation: Evidence from the implementation of the “Labor Contract Law of 2008”[J]. Management World, 2016, (7): 154-167. (In Chinese)
[13]Rao P G, Jiang G H. Monetary policy, allocation of credit resources and corporate performance[J]. Management World, 2013, (3): 12-24. (In Chinese)
[14]Song L Y, Wang X B. Key industrial policies, resource replacement and industrial productivity[J]. Management World, 2013, (12): 63- 77. (In Chinese)
[15]Yu K, Li Z G, Zhang X R, et al. Enigma of corporate investment efficiency: Financing constraints hypothesis and monetary policy impact[J]. Economic Research, 2014, (5): 106-120. (In Chinese)
[16]Zhou L. Incentives and cooperation of government officials in the promotion game: Concurrently on the causes of the long-standing existence of China’s local protectionism and repeated construction problems[J]. Economic Research, 2004, (6): 33-40. (In Chinese)
[17]Zhou Y H, He X D, Shen Y. Research on the influencing factors and output performance of independent innovation in Chinese industrial enterprises[J]. Economic Research, 2012, (5): 107-119. (In Chinese)
[18]Zhou Y H, Pu Y L, Chen S Y, etc. Government support and development of new industries: Taking new energy as an example[J]. Economic Research, 2015, (6): 147-161. (In Chinese)
[19]Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Du L S, et al. Industrial policy and competition[R]. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2011.
[20]Aghion P, Hémous D, Kharroubi E. Cyclical fiscal policy, credit constraints, and industry growth[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2014, 62: 41-58. DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.12.003
[21]Arellano M, Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1991, 58(2): 277-297. DOI:10.2307/2297968
[22]Arrow K J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[A]. Nelson R R. The rate and direction of inventive activity[C]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.
[23]Bailey W, Huang W, Yang Z. Bank loans with Chinese characteristics: Some evidence on inside debt in a state-controlled banking system[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2011, 46(6): 1795-1830. DOI:10.1017/S0022109011000433
[24]Bond S, Meghir C. Dynamic investment models and the firm's financial policy[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1994, 61(2): 197-222. DOI:10.2307/2297978
[25]Boubakri N, Cosset J C, Saffar W. Political connections of newly privatized firms[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2008, 14(5): 654-673. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003
[26]Butler A W, Cornaggia J, Grullon G, et al. Corporate financing decisions, managerial market timing, and real investment[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 101(3): 666-683. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.001
[27]Carpenter R E, Petersen B C. Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing[J]. The Economic Journal, 2002, 112(477): F54-F72. DOI:10.1111/ecoj.2002.112.issue-477
[28]Chen D, Li O Z, Xin F. Five-year plans, China finance and their consequences[R]. Nanjing University Working Paper, 2013.
[29]Guariglia A. Internal financial constraints, external financial constraints, and investment choice: Evidence from a panel of UK firms[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, 32(9): 1795-1809.
[30]Guariglia A, Liu X, Song L. Internal finance and growth: Microeconometric evidence on Chinese firms[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2011, 96(1): 79-94. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.07.003
[31]Nelson R R. The simple economics of basic scientific research[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1959, 67(3): 297-306. DOI:10.1086/258177
[32]Peneder M. The problem of private under-investment in innovation: A policy mind map[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(8): 518-530. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.006
[33]Rodrik D. Understanding economic policy reform[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1996, 34(1): 9-41.
[34]Rodrik D. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century[R]. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4767, 2004.
[35]Stiglitz J E, Weiss A. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J]. American Economic Review, 1981, 71(3): 383-410.
[36]Weiss J. Industrial policy in the twenty-first century: Challenges for the future[R]. UNU-WIDER, Working Paper No. 2011/55, 2011.
[37]Wintoki M B, Linck J S, Netter J M. Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 105(3): 581-606. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
[38]Wrigley L. Division autonomy and diversification[D]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 1970.
Cite this article
Feng Feipeng. Industrial Policies, Credit Allocation and Innovation Efficiency[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(7): 142-152.
Export Citations as:
For
