/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Editorial Board  |  Read more about this journal »
AboutAll IssuesAuthors GuidePeer ReviewSubscribeContact Us
Home  >  All Issues  >  2022  >  No.10  >  Article Details
Marketing Effect, Influence Factors, and Mechanisms of Advertisement Dynamism
Chu Xing-Yu (Marcos)1, Tang Liulu1, Dickson Tok2, Huang Yunhui1
Full Article  |  PDF Article(802.0 KB)
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 44, Issue 10, pp. 104 - 116 (2022)  DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20220621.302
First published at:Oct 20, 2022
Summary
References
Summary

Advertisement (ad) dynamism is a strategy that has been widely used in marketing practice. With the development of advertising media, modern advertising has gradually shifted from print to digital media, making actual dynamic ads more and more important. Because actual dynamic ads are easily limited by playing devices, implied dynamic ads, which make static ads have a dynamic feel through dynamic design, are more widely used. Recently, the impact of ad dynamism from both actual dynamic ads and implied dynamic ads have attracted wide attention from the industry and academia. However, the existing research lacks a systematic literature review for dynamic ads. Thus, this paper reviews 43 related articles in the marketing field from the databases of EBSCO and CNKI.

First, this paper compares the similarities and differences between actual dynamic ads and implied dynamic ads, and clarifies the definition. That is, actual dynamic ads display advertised objects in a motion form, while implied dynamic ads create implicit movement by adding dynamic elements in static ads. Second, after the systematic review, this paper outlines the marketing effect of ad dynamism from two aspects: perception, and attitude and preference. The former includes human senses, perceived novelty, perceived risk, perceived vividness, and perceived brand personality, while the latter includes consumer attitudes and purchase intentions. Third, this paper concludes three main factors that influence the impact of ad dynamism: product-related factors, communication-related factors, and consumer-related factors. Fourth, this paper summarizes three mechanisms: emotion, association, and involvement. Last, it proposes possible directions for future research on ad dynamism.

This paper contributes to the definition of ad dynamism, the sort of marketing effect, the influence factors and mechanisms of ad dynamism, and insights for future research. First, the existing research has not made a clear definition between actual dynamic ads and implied dynamic ads. By comparing their similarities and differences, this paper clarifies the definition of the two concepts and provides an important guide scheme for future research. Second, this paper outlines the marketing effect of ad dynamism and concludes the influence factors and mechanisms. It can increase our understanding of ad dynamism and its underlying mechanisms, and provide useful marketing practices and managerial implications to brand managers, marketers, and advertisers. Third, based on the review, this paper opens up avenues for future research.

Keywords
ad dynamism; actual dynamic ads; implied dynamic ads; marketing effect
[1]Wei H, Wang T, Feng W, et al. The impact of straight and tilted brand logo on perception and attitude of consumers[J]. Management Review, 2018, 30(2): 136-145.
[2]Zhong K, Wang H, Yang C. Sensory marketing: A literature review and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2016, 38(5): 69-85.
[3]Zhou X, Ye S, Li J, et al. Upright or inclining? An empirical study of the impact of brand logo shapes on the consumer product evaluation[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(2): 84-98.
[4]Aly M, Ranganath C, Yonelinas A P. Neural correlates of state- and strength-based perception[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience，2014, 26（4）: 792-809.
[5]Brasel S A, Hagtvedt H. Living brands: Consumer responses to animated brand logos[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，2016, 44（5）: 639-653.
[6]Chang C T, Chu X Y. The give and take of cause-related marketing: Purchasing cause-related products licenses consumer indulgence[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，2020, 48（2）: 203-221.
[7]Cian L, Krishna A, Elder R S. This logo moves me: Dynamic imagery from static images[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2014, 51（2）: 184-197.
[8]Cian L, Krishna A, Elder R S. A sign of things to come: Behavioral change through dynamic iconography[J]. Journal of Consumer Research，2015, 41（4）: 1426-1446.
[9]Coyle J R, Thorson E. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites[J]. Journal of Advertising，2001, 30（3）: 65-77.
[10]Detenber B H, Simons R F, Bennett Jr G G. Roll ‘em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses[J]. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media，1998, 42（1）: 113-127.
[11]Goldstein D G, Suri S, McAfee R P, et al. The economic and cognitive costs of annoying display advertisements[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2014, 51（6）: 742-752.
[12]Guido G, Pichierri M, Nataraajan R, et al. Animated logos in mobile marketing communications: The roles of logo movement directions and trajectories[J]. Journal of Business Research，2016, 69（12）: 6048-6057.
[13]Gvili Y, Tal A, Amar M, et al. Fresh from the tree: Implied motion improves food evaluation[J]. Food Quality and Preference，2015, 46: 160-165.
[14]Hao R H, Shao B J, Ma R. Impacts of video display on purchase intention for digital and home appliance products—Empirical study from China[J]. Future Internet，2019, 11（11）: 224.
[15]Hirai M, Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in human infants[J]. Cognitive Brain Research，2005, 22（2）: 301-304.
[16]Hsee C K, Yang Y, Zheng X S, et al. Lay rationalism: Individual differences in using reason versus feelings to guide decisions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2015, 52（1）: 134-146.
[17]Hsieh Y C, Chen K H. How different information types affect viewer’s attention on internet advertising[J]. Computers in Human Behavior，2011, 27（2）: 935-945.
[18]Isaac A, Marks D F, Russell D G. An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The vividness of movement imagery questionnaire (VMIQ)[J]. Journal of Mental Imagery，1986, 10（4）: 23-30.
[19]Jia H, Kim B K, Ge L. Speed up, size down: How animated movement speed in product videos influences size assessment and product evaluation[J]. Journal of Marketing，2020, 84（5）: 100-116.
[20]Keller P A, Block L G. Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective[J]. Journal of Consumer Research，1997, 24（3）:295-304.
[21]Kim J, Lakshmanan A. How kinetic property shapes novelty perceptions[J]. Journal of Marketing，2015, 79（6）: 94-111. [22]Kim J, Lakshmanan A. Do animated line graphs increase risk inferences?[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2021, 58（3）:595-613.
[23]Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience，2000, 12（1）: 48-55.
[24]Krishna A. An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology，2012, 22（3）: 332-351.
[25]Kuisma J, Simola J, Uusitalo L, et al. The effects of animation and format on the perception and memory of online advertising[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing，2010, 24（4）: 269-282.
[26]Lalwani A K, Shavitt S. You get what you pay for? Self-construal influences price-quality judgments[J]. Journal of Consumer Research，2013, 40（2）: 255-267.
[27]Lang A. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing[J]. Journal of Communication，2000, 50（1）: 46-70.
[28]Lavie N, Hirst A, de Fockert J W, et al. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General，2004, 133（3）: 339-354.
[29]Li H R, Bukovac J L. Cognitive impact of banner ad characteristics: An experimental study[J]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly，1999, 76（2）: 341-353.
[30]Li S W, Liu P. Will “moving” food tastes better? Effect of dynamic food image in print advertising on food taste perception[J].Journal of Sensory Studies，2021, 37（1）: 1-12.
[31]Mazar N, Zhong C B. Do green products make us better people?[J]. Psychological Science，2010, 21（4）: 494-498.
[32]Motoki K, Takahashi N, Velasco C, et al. Is classical music sweeter than jazz? Crossmodal influences of background music and taste/flavour on healthy and indulgent food preferences[J]. Food Quality and Preference，2022, 96: 104380.
[33]Motoyama H, Hishitani S. The brain mechanism that reduces the vividness of negative imagery[J]. Consciousness and Cognition，2016, 39: 59-69.
[34]Mourey J A, Elder R S. Dynamic by design: How incorporating dynamism in advertising affects evaluations[J]. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research，2019, 4（4）: 422-435.
[35]Mulier L, Meersseman E, Vermeir I, et al. Food on the move: The impact of implied motion in pictures on food perceptions through anticipated pleasure of consumption[J]. Foods，2021, 10（9）: 2194.
[36]Nairne J S, Pandeirada J N S, Gregory K J, et al. Adaptive memory: Fitness relevance and the hunter-gatherer mind[J].Psychological Science，2009, 20（6）: 740-746.
[37]New J, Cosmides L, Tooby J. Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，2007, 104（42）: 16598-16603.
[38]Norman J F, Ross H E, Hawkes L M, et al. Aging and the perception of speed[J]. Perception，2003, 32（1）: 85-96.
[39]Paivio A, Clark J M. Static versus dynamic imagery[A]. Cornoldi C, McDaniel M A. Imagery and cognition[M]. New York: Springer, 1991.
[40]Rapp A, Beitelspacher L S, Grewal D, et al. Understanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，2013, 41（5）: 547-566.
[41]Roberts R, Callow N, Hardy L, et al. Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire[J]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology，2008, 30（2）: 200-221.
[42]Roggeveen A L, Grewal D, Townsend C, et al. The impact of dynamic presentation format on consumer preferences for hedonic products and services[J]. Journal of Marketing，2015, 79（6）: 34-49.
[43]Shapiro S A, Nielsen J H. What the blind eye sees: Incidental change detection as a source of perceptual fluency[J]. Journal of Consumer Research，2013, 39（6）: 1202-1218.
[44]Sundar S S, Kalyanaraman S. Arousal, memory, and impression-formation effects of animation speed in web advertising[J].Journal of Advertising，2004, 33（1）: 7-17.
[45]Sundar S S, Kim J. Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement[J]. Journal of Interactive Advertising，2005, 5（2）: 5-18.
[46]Suzuki Y, Narumi T, Tanikawa T, et al. Taste in motion: The effect of projection mapping of a boiling effect on food expectation, food perception, and purchasing behavior[J]. Frontiers in Computer Science，2021, 3: 662824.
[47]Thomas N, Mulligan J. Dynamic imagery in children’s representations of number[J]. Mathematics Education Research Journal，1995, 7（1）: 5-25.
[48]Wang J F, Wang A L, Zhu L, et al. The effect of product image dynamism on purchase intention for online aquatic product shopping: An EEG study[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management，2021a, 14: 759-768.
[49]Wang X H, Sun Y X, Kramer T. Ritualistic consumption decreases loneliness by increasing meaning[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2021b, 58（2）: 282-298.
[50]Williams J D, Rippon G, Stone B M, et al. Psychophysiological correlates of dynamic imagery[J]. British Journal of Psychology，1995, 86（2）: 283-300.
[51]Yin Y L, Jia J S, Zheng W Y. The effect of slow motion video on consumer inference[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2021, 58（5）: 1007-1024.
[52]Yoo C Y, Kim K. Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses[J].Journal of Interactive Marketing，2005, 19（4）: 18-34.
[53]Zhang Y K, Xiao S H, Nicholson M. The effects of dynamic product presentation and contextual backgrounds on consumer purchase intentions: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control[J]. Journal of Advertising，2020, 49（5）: 592-612.
Cite this article
Chu Xing-Yu (Marcos), Tang Liulu, Dickson Tok, et al. Marketing Effect, Influence Factors, and Mechanisms of Advertisement Dynamism[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2022, 44(10): 104-116. 
Export Citations as: For   
Previous: A Review on the Dynamic Change of Team Members’ Status
Next: Enterprise Dynamic Competitive Behavior：A Literature Review and Prospects
ISSUE COVER
2022, Issue 10
RELATED ARTICLES
“Sound” Touches Hearts: The Marketing Effect, Mechanism, and Automatic Extraction Technique of Audio
Ran Yaxuan, Dong Linkang, Huang Yuting, et al
Para-social Interaction in Social Media and Its Marketing Effectiveness
Yuan Denghua, Gao Lidan
Journals  |   Articles  |   Submission  |   Subscribe  |   Contact us
Copyright 2024 © Department of Academic Journals, SUFE    No. 321 Guoding Rd, Shanghai, China    P.O: 200433