类借壳上市会导致上市门槛降低,监管难度增加,从而造成上市公司资产质量下降等一系列问题。
类借壳上市的实现路径与风险研究——基于玛西普类借壳星河生物的案例分析
摘要
参考文献
摘要
2 付蕙乔. 类借壳的交易模式分析−以哈工智能为例[J]. 科技经济市场,2017,(8):126−128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3788.2017.08.072
7 屈源育,沈涛,吴卫星. 上市公司壳价值与资源配置效率[J]. 会计研究,2018,(3):50−56. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2018.03.007
8 屈源育,吴卫星,沈涛. IPO还是借壳:什么影响了中国企业的上市选择?[J]. 管理世界,2018,(9):130−142. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.09.011
15 Adjei F, Cyree K B, Walker M M. The determinants and survival of reverse mergers vs IPOs[J]. Journal of Economics and Finance,2008,32(2): 176−194. DOI:10.1007/s12197-007-9012-4
16 Carpentier C, Cumming D, Suret J M. The value of capital market regulation: IPOs versus reverse mergers[J]. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,2012,9(1): 56−91. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01247.x
17 Chen K C, Cheng Q, Lin Y C, et al. Financial reporting quality of Chinese reverse merger firms: The reverse merger effect or the weak country effect?[J]. The Accounting Review,2016,91(5): 1363−1390. DOI:10.2308/accr-51376
18 Floros I V, Sapp T R A. Shell games: On the value of shell companies[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2011,17(4): 850−867. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.03.004
19 Gleason K C, Jain R, Rosenthal L. Alternatives for going public: Evidence from reverse takeovers, self-underwritten IPOs, and traditional IPOs[R]. University of Pittsburgh, 2006.
20 Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(4): 305−360. DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
21 Laeven L, Levine R. Complex ownership structures and corporate valuations[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2008,21(2): 579−604. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhm068
22 Lee C M C, Qu Y Y, Shen T. Going public in China: Reverse mergers versus IPOs[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2019,58: 92−111. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.04.003
23 Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.)[M]. London: SAGE, 2009.
引用本文
步丹璐, 贺晨, 魏鑫. 类借壳上市的实现路径与风险研究——基于玛西普类借壳星河生物的案例分析[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(6): 109-124.
导出参考文献,格式为: