/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Editorial Board  |  Read more about this journal »
AboutAll IssuesAuthors GuidePeer ReviewSubscribeContact Us
Home  >  All Issues  >  2021  >  No.03  >  Article Details
A Research Review on Artificial Intelligence in Marketing
Lin Ziyun, Wu Qionglin, Cai Fengyan
Full Article  |  PDF Article(753.5 KB)
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 43, Issue 03, pp. 89 - 106 (2021)  DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200805.301
First published at:Mar 20, 2021
Summary
References
Summary

Today, AI is playing an increasingly important role in optimizing marketing decisions, improving consumer experience, and establishing and maintaining customer relationship. Although researchers in this field have made certain achievements, due to the short application history of AI in marketing, there are some obstacles for research in this field such as lack of systematic integration of research results and core literature, confusion of related concepts, unclear research focus and future direction. This review focuses on the above deficiencies, helps readers to systematically sort out the knowledge framework of AI research in marketing and to comprehensively understand the current research progress, and hopefully provides reference or inspiration for future interdisciplinary research.

Firstly, in order to show the overview of the existing research intuitively, this review analyzes 690 papers from the WOS database, through the CiteSpace knowledge maps. We find that the “marketing + AI” research is mainly based on three aspects: the introduction of basic AI technology, marketing data analysis using AI, and the emerging “AI+service” ideas. Besides, the research in the marketing field can be summarized into four hot topics: service interaction, product design, controversial issues, and data analysis.

Secondly, we switch to a micro perspective to sort out the concept of AI. As previous research argues, the definition of AI can be summarized into two categories, namely, a human-centered approach and a rationalist approach, and scholars can focus on different definition perspectives according to what they emphasize. In order to define AI more clearly, this review compares AI concept with AI related algorithms or models like machine learning, and with other technology like IoT, robotics, etc. Researchers in this area should pay attention to these differences.

Thirdly, this review further summarizes and comments on previous research in theories, themes and methodologies. The theories involve anthropomorphism, social presence, compensatory consumption, etc. Based on the four hot topics obtained above, this review separately discusses the role of AI in the service, the possibility of AI in product design, the controversy arising from the application of AI, and the significance of AI’s data analysis function for marketing. Furthermore, the coding result of research methods shows that empirical papers dominate now and few researches use actual AI technologies to prove its conclusions.

Finally, we discuss future research directions in terms of themes and methodologies. For example, how will consumers’ expectation of the relationship between themselves and AI change over time? What characteristics of consumers and environmental factors can make the humanoid appearance and social skills of service robots produce better results? How to benefit from AI technology without hurting consumer welfare? In each stage of marketing, how to use AI technology to conduct more accurate data analysis? How to further standardize the overall measurement tools and variables in this area? etc.

Keywords
artificial intelligence (AI); human-computer interaction; marketing technology; service frontline; bibliometrics
[1] André Q, Carmon Z, Wertenbroch K, et al. Consumer choice and autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence and big data[J]. Customer Needs and Solutions, 2018, 5(1-2): 28-37.
[2] Bigman Y E, Gray K. People are averse to machines making moral decisions[J]. Cognition, 2018, 181: 21-34.
[3] Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon J K. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria[J]. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2003, 12(5): 456-480.
[4] Biocca F, Nowak K. Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments[A]. Atkin D, Lin C. Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses[C]. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2001.
[5] Čaić M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Mahr D. Service robots: Value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2018, 29(2): 178-205.
[6] Castelo N, Bos M W, Lehmann D R. Task-dependent algorithm aversion[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2019, 56(5): 809-825.
[7] Collier J E, Sherrell D L. Examining the influence of control and convenience in a self-service setting[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2010, 38(4): 490-509.
[8] Cuddy A J C, Fiske S T, Glick P. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2008, 40: 61-149.
[9] Cui G, Wong M L, Lui H K. Machine learning for direct marketing response models: Bayesian networks with evolutionary programming[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(4): 597-612.
[10] Davenport T, Guha A, Grewal D, et al. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48(1): 24-42.
[11] De Visser E J, Monfort S S, McKendrick R, et al. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2016, 22(3): 331-349.
[12] Doering N, Poeschl S, Gross H M, et al. User-centered design and evaluation of a mobile shopping robot[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2015, 7(2): 203-225.
[13] Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo J T. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism[J]. Psychological Review, 2007, 114(4): 864-886.
[14] Feil-Seifer D, Mataric M J. Defining socially assistive robotics[A]. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics[C]. Chicago, IL, USA: IEEE, 2005.
[15] Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.
[16] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach[M]. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 2010.
[17] Fiske S T, Cuddy A J C, Glick P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007, 11(2): 77-83.
[18] Fiske S T, MacRae C N. The SAGE handbook of social cognition[M]. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012.
[19] Giebelhausen M, Robinson S G, Sirianni N J, et al. Touch versus tech: When technology functions as a barrier or a benefit to service encounters[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2014, 78(4): 113-124.
[20] Gray H M, Gray K, Wegner D M. Dimensions of mind perception[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5812): 619.
[21] Gray K, Young L, Waytz A. Mind perception is the essence of morality[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2012, 23(2): 101-124.
[22] Higgins E T. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect[J]. Psychological Review, 1987, 94(3): 319-340.
[23] Ho W C, Dautenhahn K, Lim M Y, et al. An initial memory model for virtual and robot companions supporting migration and long-term interaction[A]. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication[C]. Toyama, Japan: IEEE, 2009.
[24] Hoff K A, Bashir M. Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2015, 57(3): 407-434.
[25] Huang M H, Rust R T. Artificial intelligence in service[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2018, 21(2): 155-172.
[26] Huang M H, Rust R, Maksimovic V. The feeling economy: Managing in the next generation of Artificial Intelligence[J]. California Management Review, 2019, 61(4): 43-65.
[27] Iio T, Satake S, Kanda T, et al. Human-like guide robot that proactively explains exhibits[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2020, 12(2): 549-566.
[28] Jörling M, Böhm R, Paluch S. Service robots: Drivers of perceived responsibility for service outcomes[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2019, 22(4): 404-420.
[29] Jussila I, Tarkiainen A, Sarstedt M, et al. Individual psychological ownership: Concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 121-139.
[30] Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence[J]. Business Horizons, 2019, 62(1): 15-25.
[31] Kidd C D, Breazeal C. Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction[A]. Proceedings of 2008 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems[C]. Nice, France: IEEE, 2008.
[32] Kietzmann J, Paschen J, Treen E. Artificial intelligence in advertising: How marketers can leverage artificial intelligence along the consumer journey[J]. Journal of Advertising Research, 2018, 58(3): 263-267.
[33] Kim S Y, Schmitt B H, Thalmann N M. Eliza in the uncanny valley: Anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking[J]. Marketing Letters, 2019, 30(1): 1-12.
[34] Koivisto J, Hamari J. The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 45: 191-210.
[35] Krotov V. The internet of things and new business opportunities[J]. Business Horizons, 2017, 60(6): 831-841.
[36] Kumar V, Rajan B, Venkatesan R, et al. Understanding the role of artificial intelligence in personalized engagement marketing[J]. California Management Review, 2019, 61(4): 135-155.
[37] Lee M K, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S, et al. Personalization in HRI: A longitudinal field experiment[A]. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction[C]. Boston, MA, USA: IEEE, 2012.
[38] Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge C K. Resistance to medical artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2019, 46(4): 629-650.
[39] Luo X M, Tong S L, Fang Z, et al. Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases[J]. Marketing Science, 2019, 38(6): 937-947.
[40] Mandel N, Rucker D D, Levav J, et al. The compensatory consumer behavior model: How self-discrepancies drive consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2017, 27(1): 133-146.
[41] Marinova D, De Ruyter K, Huang M H, et al. Getting smart: Learning from technology-empowered frontline interactions[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2017, 20(1): 29-42.
[42] Mathur M B, Reichling D B. Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the uncanny valley[J]. Cognition, 2016, 146: 22-32.
[43] Mende M, Scott M L, van Doorn J, et al. Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2019, 56(4): 535-556.
[44] Mori M, MacDorman K F, Kageki N. The uncanny valley [from the field][J]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2012, 19(2): 98-100.
[45] Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber E R. Computers are social actors[A]. Proceedings of 1994 SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems[C]. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: ACM, 1994.
[46] Nenkov G Y, Scott M L. “So cute I could eat it up”: Priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2014, 41(2): 326-341.
[47] Pfeifer L M, Bickmore T. Is the media equation a flash in the pan? The durability and longevity of social responses to computers[A]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems[C]. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM, 2011.
[48] Pierce J L, Kostova T, Dirks K T. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research[J]. Review of General Psychology, 2003, 7(1): 84-107.
[49] Ray C, Mondada F, Siegwart R. What do people expect from robots?[A]. Proceedings of 2008 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems[C]. Nice, France: IEEE, 2008.
[50] Redmond W H. The potential impact of artificial shopping agents in e-commerce markets[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2002, 16(1): 56-66.
[51] Reinders M J, Dabholkar P A, Frambach R T. Consequences of forcing consumers to use technology-based self-service[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2008, 11(2): 107-123.
[52] Robinson H, MacDonald B, Broadbent E. The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2014, 6(4): 575-591.
[53] Singh J, Flaherty K, Sohi R S, et al. Sales profession and professionals in the age of digitization and artificial intelligence technologies: Concepts, priorities, and questions[J]. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 2019, 39(1): 2-22.
[54] Skålén P, Gummerus J, Von Koskull C, et al. Exploring value propositions and service innovation: A service-dominant logic study[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015, 43(2): 137-158.
[55] Stalidis G, Karapistolis D, Vafeiadis A. Marketing decision support using artificial intelligence and knowledge modeling: Application to tourist destination management[J]. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 175: 106-113.
[56] Stuart R, Peter N. Artificial intelligence – A modern approach[M]. 3rd ed. Noida, India: Pearson India Education Services Pvt. Ltd, 2016.
[57] Sung J Y, Grinter R E, Christensen H I. Domestic robot ecology: An initial framework to unpack long-term acceptance of robots at home[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2010, 2(4): 417-429.
[58] Syam N, Sharma A. Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, 69: 135-146.
[59] Tay B, Jung Y, Park T. When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 38: 75-84.
[60] Timoshenko A, Hauser J R. Identifying customer needs from user-generated content[J]. Marketing Science, 2019, 38(1): 1-20.
[61] Tussyadiah I P, Park S. Consumer evaluation of hotel service robots[A]. Stangl B, Pesonen J. Information and communication technologies in tourism 2018[C]. Cham: Springer, 2018.
[62] van der Woerdt S, Haselager P. When robots appear to have a mind: The human perception of machine agency and responsibility[J]. New Ideas in Psychology, 2019, 54: 93-100.
[63] van Doorn J, Mende M, Noble S M, et al. Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2017, 20(1): 43-58.
[64] Vermeer S A M, Araujo T, Bernritter S F, et al. Seeing the wood for the trees: How machine learning can help firms in identifying relevant electronic word-of-mouth in social media[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2019, 36(3): 492-508.
[65] Weiner B. Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 1995.
[66] Wicklund R A, Gollwitzer P M. Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1981, 2(2): 89-114.
[67] Wierenga B. Marketing and artificial intelligence: Great opportunities, reluctant partners[A]. Casillas J, Martínez-López F J. Marketing intelligent systems using soft computing: Managerial and research applications[C]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
[68] Wilson H J. What is a robot, anyway[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2015, 15: 2-5.
[69] Wirtz J, Patterson P G, Kunz W H, et al. Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2018, 29(5): 907-931.
[70] Wright S A, Schultz A E. The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework[J]. Business Horizons, 2018, 61(6): 823-832.
[71] Xiao L, Kumar V. Robotics for customer service: A useful complement or an ultimate substitute?[J]. Journal of Service Research, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1094670519878881.
[72] Yadav M S, Pavlou P A. Technology-enabled interactions in digital environments: A conceptual foundation for current and future research[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48(1): 132-136.
[73] Zibafar A, Saffari E, Alemi M, et al. State-of-the-art visual merchandising using a fashionable social robot: RoMa[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00566-3.
Cite this article
Lin Ziyun, Wu Qionglin, Cai Fengyan. A Research Review on Artificial Intelligence in Marketing[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2021, 43(3): 89-106. 
Export Citations as: For   
Previous: Does Market Competition Mechanism Promote Enterprise Digital Transformation? A Quasi-natural Experiment Based on the Negative List System of Market Access
Next: “Outside, the Monarch’s Order May Not Be Accepted”: Are Remote Jobs Really Conducive to Employees’ Deviant Innovation Behavior?
ISSUE COVER
2021, Issue 03
RELATED ARTICLES
Bootlegging: A Literature Review and Prospects
Liu Weipeng, Jia Jianfeng, Yang Fu
Algorithmic Imaginary in Human-Computer Interaction: A Review and Prospects
Huang Xiaoli, Zhou Yijin
International Research Hotspots of Innovation Management and Their Evolution: Based on Visual Analysis
Wu Xiaobo, Fu Yanan
Forty Years of Corporate Governance Research: A Review and Agenda
Li Weian, Hao Chen, Cui Guangyao, et al
How Does Human-computer Interaction Impact Customer Perceived Electronic Service Quality? An Empirical Research Based on 634 Samples of Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces
Li Lei, Zhao Xia, Jian Zhaoquan
Journals  |   Articles  |   Submission  |   Subscribe  |   Contact us
Copyright 2024 © Department of Academic Journals, SUFE    No. 321 Guoding Rd, Shanghai, China    P.O: 200433