本专刊旨在呼吁学界关注数智时代下个体层面的自我管理和自我领导的研究。在新技术革命浪潮下,平台经济、远程办公、人机共存系统等新经济形态和组织模式层出不穷。数智技术既使组织变得更加开放、扁平、灵活,也使得个体拥有更加大的认知与决策能力和更自由的工作时间与空间选择,而新兴Z世代作为移动互联技术的原住民,也越来越呈现出在社交平台与工作平台之间的行为交叉混合模式。这些变化使得基于科层制的组织控制力所不逮,组织控制越来越需要通过影响个体的自我影响或自我调节系统来达到预定目标。由此看来,数智时代对于自我管理和自我领导能力的养成具有格外特殊的意义。为此,我们呼吁学者探讨数字化、智能化时代的自我管理和自我领导,扎根于数字经济中的企业新兴实践现象,探索其理论内涵、表现形式和作用机理。本专刊接受了4篇相关的实证研究,所探讨的话题分别为:人机共存关系对岗位技能要求与工作旺盛感的影响,成功的销售人员自我领导的具体概念内涵和行为表现,基于AI算法的决策与上级主管的决策对员工程序公平感知的影响及其机制和边界条件,以及算法决策对员工整体公平感以及行为的影响。在这些研究的基础上,我们倡议学术界与实践界紧密合作,研究工作者如何认识自我、管理自我并激励自我不断进步,引导个体在数智时代中发展自己的素养和能力,为经济与社会的发展贡献新的人口红利。
数智时代的自我管理和自我领导:现状与未来
摘要
参考文献
2 裴嘉良, 刘善仕, 钟楚燕, 谌一璠. AI算法决策能提高员工程序公平感知吗?[J]. 外国经济与管理,2021, 43(11): 41-55.
4 谢小云, 左玉涵, 胡琼晶. 数字化时代的人力资源管理: 基于人与技术交互的视角[J]. 管理世界,2021, 31(1): 200-217. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.01.013
5 徐敏亚, 马力, 王为久. 数字化时代销售人员自我领导行为对离职的影响[J]. 外国经济与管理,2021, 43(11): 26-40.
6 朱晓妹, 王森, 何勤. 人工智能嵌入视域下岗位技能要求对员工工作旺盛感的影响研究[J]. 外国经济与管理,2021, 43(11): 15-25.
7 魏昕, 黄鸣鹏, 李欣悦. 算法决策、员工公平感与偏差行为: 决策有利性的调节作用[J]. 外国经济与管理,2021, 43(11): 56-69.
9 Andrasik F, Heimberg J S. Self-management procedures[A]. In Frederikson L W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior management [C]. New York: Wiley. 1982.
10 Au E W M, Qin X, Zhang Z X. Beyond personal control: When and how executives’ beliefs in negotiable fate foster entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2017, 143: 69-84. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.001
11 Bandura A. Principles of behavior modification[M]. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1969.
12 Bandura A. The self-system in a reciprocal determinism[J]. American Psychologists,1978, 33: 344-358. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344
13 Cascio W F, Montealegre R. How technology is changing work and organizations[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2016, 3: 349-375. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
14 Cheng M M, Hackett R D. A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice[J]. Human Resource Management Review,2021, 31(1): 100698. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100698
15 Curchod C, Patriotta G, Cohen L, et al. Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2020, 65(3): 644-676. DOI:10.1177/0001839219867024
16 Dweck C S, Leggett E L. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality[J]. Psychological Review,1988, 95(2): 256-273. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
17 Duckworth A L. Grit: The power of passion and perseverance[M]. New York: Scribner, 2016.
18 Duckworth A L, Seligman M E P. Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents[J]. Psychological science,2005, 16(12): 939-944. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
19 Gajendran R S, Harrison D A. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007, 92: 1524-1541. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
20 Gal U, Jensen T B, Stein M K. Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics[J]. Information and Organization,2020, 30(2): 100301. DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100301
21 Granato J, Inglehart R, Leblang D. The effect of cultural values on economic development: Theory, hypotheses, and some empirical tests[J]. American Journal of Political Science,1996, 40(3): 607-631. DOI:10.2307/2111786
22 Hannah S T, Lester P B, Vogelgesang G R. Moral leadership: Explicating the moral component of authentic leadership[A]. Gardner W, Avolio B J, Walumbwa F O, Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins, effects and development [M]. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 2005.
23 Kazdin A E, Bootzin R R. The token economy: An evaluative review[J]. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,1972, 5(3): 343-372. DOI:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-343
24 Kellogg K C, Valentine M A, Christin A. Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2020, 14(1): 366-410. DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0174
25 Larson L, DeChurch L A. Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams[J]. Leadership Quarterly,2020, 31: 1-18.
26 Lindebaum D, Vesa M, den Hond F. Insights from ‘The Machine Stops’ to better understand rational assumptions in algorithmic decision making and its implications for organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review,2020, 45: 247-263. DOI:10.5465/amr.2018.0181
27 Mahoney M J, Arnkoff D. B. Cognition and self-control therapies[A]. Garfield S L, Bergom A. E. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis[M]. New York: Wiley. 1978.
28 Manz C C. Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review,1986, 11(3): 585-600. DOI:10.5465/amr.1986.4306232
29 Manz C C. Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
30 Manz C C, Sims H P, Jr. Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review,1980, 5: 361-367. DOI:10.5465/amr.1980.4288845
31 Markham S E Markham I S. Self-management and self-leadership reexamined: a levels of analysis perspective[J]. Leadership Quarterly,1995, 6: 343-59. DOI:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90013-6
32 Muller T, Niessen C. Self-leadership in the context of part-time teleworking[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2019, 40: 883-898. DOI:10.1002/job.2371
33 Neck C P, Houghton J D. Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past development and present trends[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2006, 21(4): 270-295. DOI:10.1108/02683940610663097
34 O’Leary K D, Drabman R. Token reinforcement programs in the classroom: A review[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1971, 75(6): 379-398. DOI:10.1037/h0031311
35 Petriglieri G, Ashford S J, Wrzesniewski A. Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2019, 64: 124-170. DOI:10.1177/0001839218759646
36 Prussia G E, Anderson, J S, Manz C C. Self-leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1998, 19: 523-538. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199809)19:5<523::AID-JOB860>3.0.CO;2-I
37 Seligman M E P Helplessness. On depression, development, and death[M]. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.
38 Seligman M E P, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction[J]. American Psychologist. 2000, 55(1): 5–14.
39 Stewart G L. , Courtright S H, Manz C C. Self-leadership: A multilevel review[J]. Journal of Management,2010, 37: 185-222.
40 Strack R, Carrasco M, Kolo P, et al. The future of jobs in the era of AI[R]. Boston Consulting Group, 2021.
引用本文
张志学, 赵曙明, 连汇文, 等. 数智时代的自我管理和自我领导:现状与未来[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(11): 3-14.
导出参考文献,格式为: