9286 
4900在新兴市场环境下，良好的政策感知能力是民营企业捕捉政府调控方向、应对环境不确定性的重要基础。利用中国私营企业抽样调查数据，考察了党组织嵌入对民营企业政策感知及其投资行为的影响效应。实证研究发现，作为中国情境下的一种重要制度嵌入形式，党组织嵌入有利于强化政府与民营企业之间的信息沟通，使得民营企业能够更及时捕捉和准确把握动态政策信息，党组织嵌入在政府与企业间发挥了政策传导的桥梁作用，从而显著增强了民营企业的政策感知能力。而且，党组织嵌入对民营企业政策感知的促进作用在市场欠发达地区和无政治关联企业中表现得尤为突出。进一步研究发现，党组织嵌入对民营企业政策感知的促进作用进一步提高了企业新增投资水平，尤其是长期导向的创新投资。研究结论从制度视角深化了对民营企业投资决策内在逻辑的理解。
党组织嵌入、政策感知与民营企业新增投资
摘要
参考文献
2 陈钊, 陆铭, 何俊志. 权势与企业家参政议政[J]. 世界经济,2008, (6): 39-49. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9621.2008.06.004
6 何轩, 马骏. 被动还是主动的社会行动者?——中国民营企业参与社会治理的经验性研究[J]. 管理世界,2018, (2): 34-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.02.004
7 胡宁, 王雪方, 孙莲珂, 等. 房产限购政策有助于实体企业“脱虚返实”吗——基于双重差分研究设计[J]. 南开管理评论,2019, (4): 20-31. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2019.04.003
11 林建浩, 赵文庆, 李仲达. 央行沟通与实际干预的频域政策效果研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2017, (8): 27-38. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2017.08.003
18 Aidis R, Estrin S, Mickiewicz T. Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2008, 23(6): 656-672. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.005
19 Bhattacharya U, Hsu P H, Tian X, et al. What Affects Innovation More: Policy or Policy Uncertainty?[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2017, 52(5): 1869-1901. DOI:10.1017/S0022109017000540
20 Chang E C, Wong S M L. Political control and performance in China’s listed firms[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2004, 32(4): 617-636. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.001
21 Droege S, Johnson N B. Broken rules and constrained confusion: Toward a theory of Meso-institutions[J]. Management and Organization Review,2007, 3(1): 81-104. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00062.x
22 Gulen H, Ion M. Policy uncertainty and corporate investment[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2016, 29(3): 523-564. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhv050
23 Haveman H A, Jia N, Shi J, et al. The dynamics of political embeddedness in China[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2017, 62(1): 67-104. DOI:10.1177/0001839216657311
24 Jens C E. Political uncertainty and investment: Causal evidence from U.S. gubernatorial elections[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2017, 124(3): 563-579. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.034
25 Julio B, Yook Y. Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles[J]. The Journal of Finance,2012, 67(1): 45-83. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01707.x
26 Lei Z H, Nugent J B. Coordinating China’s economic growth strategy via its government-controlled association for private firms[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2018, 46(4): 1273-1293. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2018.08.002
27 Li H B, Meng L S, Wang Q, et al. Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2008, 87(2): 283-299. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001
28 Luo X M, Zhou L X, Liu S S. Entrepreneurial firms in the context of China’s transition economy: An integrative framework and empirical examination[J]. Journal of Business Research,2005, 58(3): 277-284. DOI:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00159-0
29 Ma G R, Rui O M, Wu Y P. A springboard into politics: Do Chinese entrepreneurs benefit from joining the government-controlled business associations?[J]. China Economic Review,2015, 36: 166-183. DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2015.09.003
30 Marquis C, Qiao K Y. Waking from Mao’s dream: Communist ideological imprinting and the internationalization of entrepreneurial ventures in China[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2018. DOI:10.1177/0001839218792837
31 Mintzberg H. A new look at the chief executive’s job[J]. Organizational Dynamics,1973, 1(3): 21-30. DOI:10.1016/S0090-2616(73)80015-4
32 North D C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
33 Peng M W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003, 28(2): 275-296. DOI:10.5465/amr.2003.9416341
35 Zahra S A. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1991, 6(4): 259-285. DOI:10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A
引用本文
徐细雄, 占恒, 李万利. 党组织嵌入、政策感知与民营企业新增投资[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(10): 3-16.
导出参考文献，格式为：
