数字化时代的创业企业能否以及如何突破履行社会责任不力的困境?本文首先回顾了创业企业社会责任的概念,并结合企业社会责任过程框架,基于资源基础理论和利益相关者理论,从问题识别、战略决策、履行过程和信息披露四个方面,论证了元宇宙的革命性特征助力突破创业企业社会责任行动困境的机理。最后,结合元宇宙下创业企业履行社会责任的过程重构思路,提出创业企业履行社会责任的研究视角应该从现实互动转向虚拟互动、从单维身份转向多重身份,并提出未来重要的研究方向和重点研究问题。
元宇宙与创业企业社会责任:行动困境、过程重构与未来方向
摘要
参考文献
5 李云鹤, 李湛, 唐松莲. 企业生命周期、公司治理与公司资本配置效率[J]. 南开管理评论,2011, 14(3): 110-121. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.03.013
9 刘志阳, 李斌, 庄欣荷. 初创企业创业机会迭代机制研究[J]. 科学学研究,2019, 37(3): 500-516. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2019.03.014
12 眭文娟, 张慧玉. 新创企业的战略导向、企业可见性与慈善捐赠[J]. 管理学报,2015, 12(9): 1328-1336. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.09.009
14 田茂利. 创业企业的社会责任与创业绩效——基于现代服务业的数据[J]. 科技管理研究,2012, 32(4): 198-202. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2012.04.049
15 王德宇, 宋述强, 陈震. 增强现实技术在高校创客教育中的应用[J]. 中国电化教育,2016, (10): 112-115. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2016.10.020
16 王加灿. 基于生命周期理论的企业社会责任管理[J]. 企业经济,2006, (5): 63-65. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5024.2006.05.021
18 王钰, 胡海青. 知识产权保护与新创企业绩效——创业导向与社会责任的中介效应[J]. 科技进步与对策,2021, 38(4): 62-69. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020010203
20 吴春雅, 江帆, 袁云云. 现实与虚拟社会网络对农民电商创业绩效的影响研究——基于创业学习中介效应分析[J]. 农业经济与管理,2020, (1): 90-100. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9189.2020.01.009
23 肖红军, 李平. 平台型企业社会责任的生态化治理[J]. 管理世界,2019, 35(4): 120-144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.04.012
36 张辉, 曾雄, 梁正. 探微“元宇宙”: 概念内涵、形态发展与演变机理[J]. 科学学研究,2023, 41(5): 769-776. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2023.05.001
39 张宁, 常帅峰, 袁勤俭. 元宇宙视域下数字文旅用户参与行为的影响因素[J/OL]. 图书馆论坛, 1-12.https://kns.cnki.net/kns8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=0&CurRec=1&recid=&FileName=TSGL20230111001&DbName=CAPJLAST&DbCode=CAPJ&yx=Y&pr=&URLID=44.1306.g2.20230113.0939.007, 2023-01-18.
42 Ali W, Frynas J G, Mahmood Z. Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2017, 24(4): 273-294. DOI:10.1002/csr.1410
43 Barassi V, Treré E. Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice[J]. New Media & Society,2012, 14(8): 1269-1285.
44 Battistella C, De Toni A F, Pessot E. Open accelerators for start-ups success: A case study[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management,2017, 20(1): 80-111. DOI:10.1108/EJIM-10-2015-0113
45 Davis A, Murphy J, Owens D, et al. Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in metaverses[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,2009, 10(2): 90-117. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00183
46 Devece C, Peris-Ortiz M, Rueda-Armengot C. Entrepreneurship during economic crisis: Success factors and paths to failure[J]. Journal of Business Research,2016, 69(11): 5366-5370. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.139
47 Dionisio J D N, Burns III W G, Gilbert R. 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities[J]. ACM Computing Surveys,2013, 45(3): 34.
48 Dwivedi Y K, Hughes L, Baabdullah A M, et al. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2022, 66: 102542. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
49 Grinberg A M, Careaga J S, Mehl M R, et al. Social engagement and user immersion in a socially based virtual world[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2014, 36: 479-486. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.008
50 Harris J D, Sapienza H J, Bowie N E. Ethics and entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(5): 407-418. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.001
51 Hendler J. Web 3.0 emerging[J]. Computer,2009, 42(1): 111-113. DOI:10.1109/MC.2009.30
52 Kraus S, Kanbach D K, Krysta P M, et al. Facebook and the creation of the metaverse: Radical business model innovation or incremental transformation?[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,2022, 28(9): 52-77.
53 Lechner C, Gudmundsson S V. Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance[J]. International Small Business Journal:Researching Entrepreneurship,2014, 32(1): 36-60. DOI:10.1177/0266242612455034
54 Li H Z, Terjesen S, Umans T. Corporate governance in entrepreneurial firms: A systematic review and research agenda[J]. Small Business Economics,2020, 54(1): 43-74. DOI:10.1007/s11187-018-0118-1
55 Liu Y, Xu C. Consumer intention to purchase and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from an experiment in an entrepreneurial context[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2021,doi: 10.1002/cb.1987.
56 Ma L, Cao Y, Jiang D K, et al. Does ethics really matter to the sustainability of new ventures? The relationship between entrepreneurial ethics, firm visibility and entrepreneurial performance[J]. PLoS One,2020, 15(1): e0226920. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0226920
57 Marcon A, Ribeiro J L D. How do startups manage external resources in innovation ecosystems? A resource perspective of startups’ lifecycle[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2021, 171: 120965. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120965
58 Michelon G, Pilonato S, Ricceri F. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis[J]. Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2015, 33: 59-78. DOI:10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
59 Nevelsteen K J L. Virtual world, defined from a technological perspective and applied to video games, mixed reality, and the Metaverse[J]. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds,2018, 29(1): e1752. DOI:10.1002/cav.1752
60 Papagiannidis S, Bourlakis M, Li F. Making real money in virtual worlds: MMORPGs and emerging business opportunities, challenges and ethical implications in metaverses[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2008, 75(5): 610-622. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.04.007
61 Randrianasolo A A, Semenov A V. Synergy versus trade-off: The influence of national philanthropic environment and industry on the relationship between research and development and corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2022, 30(1): 75-92. DOI:10.1177/1069031X211054507
62 Sánchez-Pérez M, Rueda-López N, Marin-Carrillo M B, et al. Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: A qualitative analysis[J]. Review of Managerial Science,2021, 15(7): 1849-1883. DOI:10.1007/s11846-020-00418-9
63 Song L H, Liang Q, Lu Y, et al. Why Chinese entrepreneurial firms selectively perform corporate social responsibility issues?[J]. Chinese Management Studies,2016, 10(2): 272-290. DOI:10.1108/CMS-10-2015-0241
64 Tang Z, Tang J T. Stakeholder corporate social responsibility orientation congruence, entrepreneurial orientation and environmental performance of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises[J]. British Journal of Management,2018, 29(4): 634-651. DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.12255
65 Udayasankar K. Corporate social responsibility and firm size[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2008, 83(2): 167-175. DOI:10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8
66 Van Gelderen M, Wiklund J, McMullen J S. Entrepreneurship in the future: A Delphi study of ETP and JBV editorial board members[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2021, 45(5): 1239-1275. DOI:10.1177/10422587211010503
67 Wang C Y. Monopoly with corporate social responsibility, product differentiation, and environmental R&D: Implications for economic, environmental, and social sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021, 287: 125433. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125433
68 Wang Z H, Sarkis J. Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017, 162: 1607-1616. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
69 Zhang Z, Wang X, Jia M. Echoes of CEO entrepreneurial orientation: How and when CEO entrepreneurial orientation influences dual CSR activities[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2021, 169(4): 609-629. DOI:10.1007/s10551-020-04553-x
70 Zyskind G, Nathan O, Pentland A S. Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data[A]. 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops[C]. San Jose: IEEE, 2015.
引用本文
冉戎, 王欣源, 杨笑然. 元宇宙与创业企业社会责任:行动困境、过程重构与未来方向[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(7): 36-52.
导出参考文献,格式为: