, 1, 2
7303 
8710由于工作群体内领导对不同下属的“差别对待”在中西方组织中都很普遍，并且中西方对该现象的研究在很大程度上相互独立，因此本文对中西方领导差别对待相关构念的发展和影响效应研究进行了比较式回顾。本文发现，中西方各自所提出的领导差别对待构念有着不同的理论基础和文化背景，因而内涵存在差异。此外本文还发现，基于中西方构念的领导差别对待效应研究，尽管都存在实证结果不一致的现象，并且都涉及领导差别对待与员工公平感之间的关系和领导差别对待所带来的群体分化等问题，但各自所采用的理论视角、所提出的具体假设机制存在很多差异。基于相关回顾，本文最后对领导差别对待理论的未来发展进行了展望并简单讨论了该理论的“跨文化适用性”问题。
领导差别对待：中西方研究的比较式回顾与未来展望
摘要
参考文献
2 陈璐, 杨百寅, 井润田. 战略型领导与高管团队成员创造力: 基于高科技企业的实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2015,（3）: 142–152, 121.
9 刘贞妤. 差序气氛对部属工作态度与行为之影响[D]. 中国台湾: 台湾东华大学, 2003.
20 Chen X P, Eberly M B, Chiang T J, et al. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2014a, 40（3）: 796–819. DOI:10.1177/0149206311410604
21 Chen X P, He W, Weng L C. What is wrong with treating followers differently? The basis of leader-member exchange differentiation matters[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0149206315598372. DOI:10.1177/0149206315598372
22 Chen Y, Friedman R, Yu E H, et al. Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2009, 5（3）: 375–399. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00153.x
23 Chen Y, Yu E H, Son J. Beyond leader-member exchange（LMX）differentiation: An indigenous approach to leader-member relationship differentiation[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014b, 25（3）: 611–627. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.004
24 Dansereau Jr F, Graen G, Haga W J. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13（1）: 46–78. DOI:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
25 Dong Y T, Bartol K M, Zhang Z X, et al. Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: Influences of dual-focused transformational leadership[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2017, 38（3）: 439–458. DOI:10.1002/job.v38.3
26 Erdogan B, Bauer T N. Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95（6）: 1104–1120. DOI:10.1037/a0020578
27 Farh J L, Tsui A S, Xin K, et al. The influence of relational demography and Guanxi: The Chinese case[J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9（4）: 471–488. DOI:10.1287/orsc.9.4.471
28 Gooty J, Yammarino F J. The leader-member exchange relationship: A multisource, cross-level investigation[J]. Journal of Management, 2016, 42（4）: 915–935. DOI:10.1177/0149206313503009
29 Graen G B, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange（LMX）theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6（2）: 219–247. DOI:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
30 Harris T B, Li N, Kirkman B L. Leader-member exchange（LMX）in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on OCB and turnover intention[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25（2）: 314–328. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.001
31 Haynie J J, Cullen K L, Lester H F, et al. Differentiated leader-member exchange, justice climate, and performance: Main and interactive effects[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25（5）: 912–922. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.007
32 Henderson D J, Wayne S J, Shore L M, et al. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93（6）: 1208–1219. DOI:10.1037/a0012678
33 Henderson D J, Liden R C, Glibkowski B C, et al. LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2009, 20（4）: 517–534. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
34 Herdman A O, Yang J, Arthur J B. How does leader-member exchange disparity affect teamwork behavior and effectiveness in work groups? The moderating role of leader-leader exchange[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43（5）: 1498–1523. DOI:10.1177/0149206314556315
35 Hooper D T, Martin R. Beyond personal leader-member exchange（LMX）quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2008, 19（1）: 20–30. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.002
36 Hu H H, Hsu W L, Cheng B S. Reward allocation decisions of Chinese managers: Influence of employee categorization and allocation context[J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2004, 7（2）: 221–232. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2004.00146.x
37 Jiang W, Gu Q X, Wang G G. To guide or to divide: The dual-side effects of transformational leadership on team innovation[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2015, 30（4）: 677–691. DOI:10.1007/s10869-014-9395-0
38 Kark R, Shamir B. The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective selves and further effects on followers[A]. Avolio B J, Yammarino F J. Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead[C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002: 67–91.
39 Kauppila O P. When and how does LMX differentiation influence followers’ work outcomes? The interactive roles of one’s own LMX status and organizational context[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69（2）: 357–393. DOI:10.1111/peps.2016.69.issue-2
40 Kunze F, de Jong S B, Bruch H. Consequences of collective-focused leadership and differentiated individual-focused leadership: Development and testing of an organizational-level model[J]. Journal of Management, 2016, 42（4）: 886–914. DOI:10.1177/0149206313498903
41 Le Blanc P M, González-Romá V. A team level investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange（LMX）differentiation, and commitment and performance[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2012, 23（3）: 534–544. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.006
42 Li A N, Liao H. How do leader-member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014, 99（5）: 847–866. DOI:10.1037/a0037233
43 Li S L, Huo Y Y, Long L R. Chinese traditionality matters: Effects of differentiated empowering leadership on followers’ trust in leaders and work outcomes[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 145（1）: 81–93. DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2900-1
44 Liao H, Liu D, Loi R. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53（5）: 1090–1109. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533207
46 Liden R C, Erdogan B, Wayne S J, et al. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27（6）: 723–746. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
47 Nielsen K, Daniels K. Does shared and differentiated transformational leadership predict followers’ working conditions and well-being?[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2012, 23（3）: 383–397. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.001
48 Sui Y, Wang H, Kirkman B L, et al. Understanding the curvilinear relationships between LMX differentiation and team coordination and performance[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69（3）: 559–597. DOI:10.1111/peps.2016.69.issue-3
49 Wang L, Cheng M Y, Wang S. Carrot or stick? The role of in-group/out-group on the multilevel relationship between authoritarian and differential leadership and employee turnover intention[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3299-z. DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3299-z
50 Wu J B, Tsui A S, Kinicki A J. Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53（1）: 90–106. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037079
51 Zhang X A, Li N, Ullrich J, et al. Getting everyone on board: The effect of CEO differentiated transformational leadership on top management team effectiveness and leader-rated firm performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, 41（7）: 1898–1933. DOI:10.1177/0149206312471387
52 Zhou J M, Liu S, Zhang X S, et al. Differential leadership, team conflict and new product development performance[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2016, 10（3）: 544–558. DOI:10.1108/CMS-10-2015-0240
引用本文
来宪伟, 许晓丽, 程延园. 领导差别对待：中西方研究的比较式回顾与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(3): 92-106.
导出参考文献，格式为：
