流动团队有效性研究：一个扩展的IMOI模型 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 陈璐, 杨百寅, 井润田. 家长式领导对高管团队有效性的影响机制研究: 以团队凝聚力为中介变量[J]. 管理工程学报,2012, (1): 13-19, 34. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2012.01.002

6 钱焱, 刘洪. 论构建临时团队的快速信任机制[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版),2007, (3): 71-75, 134. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4608-B.2007.03.012

7 武欣, 吴志明. 团队共享心智模型的影响因素与效果[J]. 心理学报,2005, (4): 542-549.

8 伍玉琴, 王安民. 基于交互记忆系统的团队有效性模型研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2010, (10): 191-193. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2010.10.063

9 许科, 韩雨卿, 于晓宇, 等. 快速信任与临时团队绩效: 共享心智模型与团队互依性的角色[J]. 管理评论,2016, (9): 238-249.

10 杨伟, 李乐. 临时性组织研究评介与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2013, (6): 52-60.

11 杨志蓉, 谢章澍, 宝贡敏. 团队快速信任、互动行为对团队创造力的作用机理研究[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010, (6): 31-34. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3321.2010.06.004

12 尹媛, 王锐兰. 应急志愿服务临时性团队的信任影响因素及管理路径研究[J]. 东华大学学报(社会科学版),2016, (1): 11-17.

13 张钢, 乐晨. 团队有效性研究新进展: 团队适应研究综述[J]. 科技进步与对策,2017, (1): 154-160. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2016080395

14 张晓怿, 王云峰, 于巍. 特定组织氛围研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2016, (9): 64-79.

15 张志学, Hempel P S, 韩玉兰, 等. 高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J]. 心理学报,2006, (2): 271-280.

16 赵曙明. 人力资源管理理论研究新进展评析与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2011, (1): 1-10.

17 Avgerinos E, Gokpinar B. Team familiarity and productivity in cardiac surgery operations: The effect of dispersion, bottlenecks, and task complexity[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,2016, 19(1): 19-35.

18 Bakker A B, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2007, 22(3): 309-328. DOI:10.1108/02683940710733115

19 Bakker R M. Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2010, 12(4): 466-486. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00281.x

20 Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Advances in Strategic Management,1991, 17(1): 203-227.

21 Barsade S G, Gibson D E. Group affect: Its influence on individual and group outcomes[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science,2012, 21(2): 119-123. DOI:10.1177/0963721412438352

22 Beal D J, Cohen R R, Burke M J, et al. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(6): 989-1004. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989

23 Bell B S, Kozlowski S W J. Three conceptual themes for future research on teams[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology,2012, 5(1): 45-48. DOI:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01403.x

24 Bushe G R, Chu A. Fluid teams: Solutions to the problems of unstable team membership[J]. Organizational Dynamics,2011, 40(3): 181-188. DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.04.005

25 Catchpole K R, Giddings A E B, Wilkinson M, et al. Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations[J]. Surgery,2007, 142(1): 102-110. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2007.01.033

26 Cohen S G, Bailey D E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management,1997, 23(3): 239-290. DOI:10.1177/014920639702300303

27 Davenport D L, Henderson W G, Mosca C L, et al. Risk-adjusted morbidity in teaching hospitals correlates with reported levels of communication and collaboration on surgical teams but not with scale measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, or working conditions[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons,2007, 205(6): 778-784. DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.039

28 De Dreu C K W, Weingart L R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(4): 741-749. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

29 Dechurch L A, Mesmer-Magnus J R. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2010, 95(1): 32-53. DOI:10.1037/a0017328

30 Edmondson A C, Nembhard I M. Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2010, 26(2): 123-138.

31 Engwall M, Westling G. Peripety in an R&D drama: Capturing a turnaround in project dynamics[J]. Organization Studies,2004, 25(9): 1557-1578. DOI:10.1177/0170840604048000

32 Fleming M, Smith S, Slaunwhite J, et al. Investigating interpersonal competencies of cardiac surgery teams[J]. Canadian Journal of Surgery,2006, 49(1): 22-30.

33 Gladstein G A. The role of empathy in counseling: Theoretical considerations[A]. Empathy and counseling[M]. New York, NY: Springer, 1987.

34 Gully S M, Incalcaterra K A, Joshi A, et al. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2002, 87(5): 819-832. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819

35 Hollenbeck J R, Beersma B, Schouten M E. Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description[J]. Academy of Management Review,2012, 37(1): 82-106.

36 Huckman R S, Staats B R, Upton D M. Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services[J]. Management Science,2009, 55(1): 85-100. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0921

37 Huckman R S, Staats B R. Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,2011, 13(3): 310-328.

38 Hughes A M, Patterson P D, Weaver M D, et al. Teammate familiarity, teamwork, and risk of workplace injury in emergency medical services teams[J]. Journal of Emergency Nursing,2017, 43(4): 339-346. DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2016.11.007

39 Ilgen D R, Hollenbeck J R, Johnson M, et al. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,2005, 56(1): 517-543. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250

40 Knight A P, Eisenkraft N. Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(4): 1214-1227. DOI:10.1037/apl0000006

41 Kozlowski S W J, Klein K J. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes[A]. Klein K J, Kozlowski S W J. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions[C]. San Francisco: Extensions, and New Directions, 2000.

42 Kozlowski S W J, Chao G T. The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2012, 33(5-6): 335-354. DOI:10.1002/mde.2552

43 Kozlowski S W J. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams: A reflection[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science,2017, 13(2): 205-212.

44 LePine J A, Hanson M A, Borman W C, et al. Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing[J]. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,2000, 19: 53-90.

45 Levine J M, Moreland R L. Knowledge transmission in work groups: Helping newcomers to succeed[A]. Thompson L L, Levine J M, Messick D M. Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge[M]. New York: Psychology Press, 1999.

46 Luciano M M, Bartels A L, D’Innocenzo L, et al. Shared team experiences and team effectiveness: Unpacking the contingent effects of entrained rhythms and task characteristics[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(4): 1403-1430. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0828

47 Lundin R A, Söderholm A. A theory of the temporary organization[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management,1995, 11(4): 437-455. DOI:10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U

48 Mannor M J, Shamsie J, Conlon D E. Does experience help or hinder top managers? Working with different types of resources in hollywood[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2016, 37(7): 1330-1340. DOI:10.1002/smj.2394

49 Mathieu J, Maynard T M, Rapp T, et al. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future[J]. Journal of Management,2008, 34(3): 410-476. DOI:10.1177/0149206308316061

50 Mathieu J E, Hollenbeck J R, Van Knippenberg D, et al. A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2017, 102(3): 452-467. DOI:10.1037/apl0000128

51 McGrath J E, Kravitz D A. Group research[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,1982, 33: 195-230. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.001211

52 Miller D, Shamsie J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996, 39(3): 519-543.

53 Narayan V, Kadiyali V. Repeated interactions and improved outcomes: An empirical analysis of movie production in the United States[J]. Management Science,2015, 62(2): 591-607.

54 Paletz S B F, Schunn C D. Assessing group-level participation in fluid teams: Testing a new metric[J]. Behavior Research Methods,2011, 43(2): 522-536. DOI:10.3758/s13428-011-0070-3

55 Sirmon D, Gove S, Hitt M. Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effects of resource bundling and deployment[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2008, 51(5): 919-935. DOI:10.5465/amj.2008.34789656

56 Slotegraaf R J, Atuahene-Gima K. Product development team stability and new product advantage: The role of decision-making processes[J]. Journal of Marketing,2011, 75(1): 96-108. DOI:10.1509/jm.75.1.96

57 Sundstrom E, Mcintyre M, Halfhill T, et al. Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond[J]. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,2000, 4(1): 44-67. DOI:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.44

58 Wegner D M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind[A]. Mullen B, Goethals G R. Theories of group behavior[M]. New York: Springer, 1987.

59 Whitley R. Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme?[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2006, 15(1): 77-99. DOI:10.1093/icc/dtj003

60 Zhou Y, Wang E P. Shared mental medels as moderators of team process-performance relationships[J]. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal,2010, 38(4): 433-444. DOI:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.4.433