3582 
2175积极推进政民互动是全面实施乡村振兴战略、推进共同富裕的坚强保障，但较少有研究揭示在何种条件下政民互动能在多大程度上帮助改善居民福利。文章利用2016年上海财经大学“千村调查”数据，使用结构方程模型探讨了政民互动对农村居民福利水平的影响。研究结果表明，首先，政民互动渠道的畅通拉近了基层政权与村民之间的距离，并有助于提升居民福利水平。其次，政民互动的三个阶段均不同程度地提升了居民主观福利，其中在事中互动环节，村干部关于公共政策信息的解读对结果的影响更为显著。最后，清廉感知、程序公平和精准帮扶可以在一定程度上解释政民互动和居民福利的关系，其中程序公平在政民互动与居民主观福利改善间的调节作用高于清廉感知和精准帮扶。文章结论对于实现农村居民与国家政策之间的良性互动、推进基层治理体系和治理能力现代化具有重要的实践意义。
政民互动与农村居民福利*——基于上海财经大学“千村调查”数据的实证研究
摘要
参考文献
2 高勇. 参与行为与政府信任的关系模式研究[J]. 社会学研究,2014,(5):98−119. DOI:10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2014.05.005
4 梁城城. 村级信息公开对公共产品供给的影响−来自CLDS的经验证据[J]. 财政科学,2018,(3):89−102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-1391.2018.03.015
6 马文涛,张朋. 财政透明度、逆周期调控与政府债务规模[J]. 世界经济,2020,(5):23−48. DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2020.05.003
8 沙勇忠,王峥嵘,詹建. 政民互动行为如何影响网络问政效果?−基于“问政泸州”的大数据探索与推论[J]. 公共管理学报,2019,(2):15−27. DOI:10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.2019.02.001
12 王学军,王子琦. 政民互动、公共价值与政府绩效改进−基于北上广政务微博的实证分析[J]. 公共管理学报,2017,(3):31−43. DOI:10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.2017.03.004
15 Acock A C. Discovering structural equation modeling using stata[M]. Station: Stata Press, 2013.
16 Aguiar M, Bils M. Has consumption inequality mirrored income inequality?[J]. American Economic Review,2015,105(9): 2725−2756. DOI:10.1257/aer.20120599
17 Amirkhanyan A A, Lambright K T. Citizen participation in the age of contracting: When service delivery trumps democracy[M]. New York: Routledge, 2017.
18 Bentler P M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1990,107(2): 238−246. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
19 Bonett D G, Wright T A. Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2015,36(1): 3−15. DOI:10.1002/job.1960
20 Brennan G, Buchanan J M. The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
21 Campbell D A, Lambright K T. Program performance and multiple constituency theory[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2016,45(1): 150−171. DOI:10.1177/0899764014564578
22 Fung A. Varieties of participation in complex governance[J]. Public Administration Review,2006,66(S1): 66−75. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
23 Gastil J, Levine P. The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
24 Hair J F, Black WC, Babin B J, et al. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective[M]. 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010.
25 Hancock G R, Mueller R O. Structural equation modeling: A second course[M]. 2nd ed. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 2013.
26 Herian M N, Hamm J A, Tomkins A J, et al. Public participation, procedural fairness, and evaluations of local gover- nance: The moderating role of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2012,22(4): 815−840. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mur064
28 Lindholm C, Stevanovic M. Challenges of trust in atypical interaction[J]. Pragmatics and Society,2022,13(1): 107−125. DOI:10.1075/ps.18077.lin
29 Sauer U, Fischer A. Willingness to pay, attitudes and fundamental values: On the cognitive context of public preferences for diversity in agricultural landscapes[J]. Ecological Economics,2010,70(1): 1−9. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.026
30 Schmidthuber L, Stütz S, Hilgers D. Outcomes of open government: Does an online platform improve citizens’ perception of local government?[J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management,2019,32(5): 489−507. DOI:10.1108/IJPSM-02-2018-0056
31 Schumacker R E, Lomax R G. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling[M]. 4th ed. New York: Routledge, 2015.
32 Yang K F, Pandey S K. Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes?[J]. Public Administration Review,2011,71(6): 880−892. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x
引用本文
周彩, 李博文, 吴一平. 政民互动与农村居民福利*——基于上海财经大学“千村调查”数据的实证研究[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(2): 64-78.
导出参考文献，格式为：
