As an important regional integration policy, the mechanism of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Economic Coordination Committee’s(ECC)influence on micro-economic entities has not been thoroughly studied. In fact, through cooperation forums, cooperation topics, business service alliances, etc., ECC provides a communication platform for companies, and forms communication and cooperation between governments and companies. The information spillover generated by ECC can have an impact on the company’s behavior. This paper focuses on the impact of regional coordinated development policies on the executive compensation incentive in corporate governance. Especially, in view of the phenomenon of excess executive compensation prevailing in companies in recent years, this paper specifically examines whether ECC can help to reduce the excess executive compensation, and how can ECC play a governance role through the information spillover? Using different cities joining ECC at different times as a quasi-natural experimental situation, based on the data of listed companies in China’s capital market from 2008 to 2016 as the research sample, this paper examines how joining ECC affects excess executive compensation by using the difference-in-differences method. This method compares the difference of the change of executive compensation around joining ECC between companies registered in the member cities of ECC and companies registered in other cities. It comes to the following conclusions: First, after controlling the year fixed effect and the company fixed effect, the results of the difference-in-differences method show that joining ECC can significantly reduce excess executive compensation. The result is also of great economic significance. On average, after the company’s city joining ECC, its executive’s excess compensation drops by 11.6%. Second, since the reduction of the executive’s excess compensation is caused by the improvement of the corporate governance mechanism and the reduction of agency problems after the information spillover, the effect is more pronounced for those companies with higher network centrality of the executive, worse information environment and lower total factor productivity. This paper provides new empirical evidence for the economic consequences of regional coordinated development policies from the governance mechanism of micro-economic entities. It has certain enlightenment significance for the national regional coordinated development strategy, economic development, the design of the company’s optimal compensation contract and so on. Generally speaking, this paper extends the existing research from three aspects: First, it contributes to the analysis of the economic effects of regional integration and urban economic coordination, and supplements the empirical evidence of how regional coordinated development policies affect micro-economic entities. Second, it contributes to the related research on excess executive compensation and corporate governance, which shows that the information spillover generated by ECC will lead to the reduction of excess executive compensation, and helps to promote the design of optimal executive compensation. Third, the quasi-natural experiment used in this paper can effectively alleviate the interference of endogenous problems, and help to better identify the causal effect of ECC on the excess executive compensation.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
The Role of Regional Coordinated Development Policies in Corporate Governance:Quasi-natural Experiment Evidence from Urban Economic Coordination Committee
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 45, Issue 06, pp. 101 - 114,140 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.06.008
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Chen S L, Lu R. Non-tradable share reform, earnings management and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2012,(10):180–192. (In Chinese)
[2] Wu L S, Lin J Y, Wang Y P. The external fairness of CEO’s emolument, the nature of stock right and company’s performance [J]. Management World, 2010,(3):117–126. (In Chinese)
[3] Xu X X, Li X. Domestic market integration and regional coordinate development [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2005,(12):57–67. (In Chinese)
[4] Zhang X L, Li P X, Li L X. Government cooperation, market integration and economic performance of city cluster: evidence from the Yangze River Delta Urban Economic Coordination Committee [J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2017,(4):1563–1582. (In Chinese)
[5] Bebchuk L A, Fried J M. Executive compensation as an agency problem[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, 17(3): 71–92. DOI:10.1257/089533003769204362
[6] Bertrand M, Mullainathan S. Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003, 111(5): 1043–1075. DOI:10.1086/376950
[7] Bizjak J, Lemmon M, Nguyen T. Are all CEOs above Average? An empirical analysis of compensation peer groups and pay design[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 100(3): 538–555. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.007
[8] Chen T, Harford J, Lin C. Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 115(2): 383–410. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.002
[9] Christoffersen S E K, Sarkissian S. City size and fund performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 92(2): 252–275. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.06.001
[10] Core J E, Holthausen R W, Larcker D F. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 51(3): 371–406. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
[11] Dessaint O, Golubov A, Volpin P. Employment protection and takeovers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2017, 125(2): 369–388. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.05.005
[12] Duranton G, Puga D. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies[J]. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 2004, 4: 2063–2117. DOI:10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1
[13] Faulkender M, Yang J. Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2010, 96(2): 257–270. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.01.006
[14] Francis B B, Hasan I, John K, et al. Urban Agglomeration and CEO Compensation[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2016, 51(6): 1925–1953. DOI:10.1017/S0022109016000752
[15] Frydman C, Papanikolaou D. In search of ideas: Technological innovation and executive pay inequality[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2018, 130(1): 1–24. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.014
[16] Giannetti M, Liao G M, Yu X Y. The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(4): 1629–1682. DOI:10.1111/jofi.2015.70.issue-4
[17] Phua J K, Tham T M, Wei C S. Do equity analysts learn from their colleagues? [R]. Working Paper, 2018.
[18] Roberts M R, Whited T M. Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance[J]. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 2013, 2: 493–572. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-44-453594-8.00007-0
[19] Sauerwald S, Lin Z A, Peng M W. Board social capital and excess CEO returns[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(3): 498–520. DOI:10.1002/smj.2016.37.issue-3
[20] Shleifer A, Vishny R W. A survey of corporate governance[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2): 737–783. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Cite this article
Chen Shenglan, Li Jing, Yin Ying. The Role of Regional Coordinated Development Policies in Corporate Governance:Quasi-natural Experiment Evidence from Urban Economic Coordination Committee[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 45(6): 101-114.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES