Employment is the greatest livelihood. At present, the number of unemployed people and the number of employed people increase simultaneously, so we need to seek effective ways to reduce the unemployment rate in the future. Since the employment situation is directly related to major people’s livelihood and development issues such as public income and social stability, researches on the factors influencing labor employment is growing. The existing literature studies from the perspectives of education, wages, household registration, population structure and so on. However, it pays less attention to the effect of environmental pollution on labor employment and neglects the endogeneity of environmental pollution. More importantly, the answer to this question is conducive to clarifying the employment loss effect of environmental pollution. This provides scientific basis and reference for evaluating the social cost of environmental pollution and designing optimal environmental policies. To address the endogeneity of environmental pollution, this paper uses the exogenous changes of SO2 emission between TCZ（Two Control Zones）cities and non-TCZ cities caused by the policy of the environmental protection accountability system in late 2005. Based on the panel data of 285 cities in China from 2003 to 2013, the study identifies the effect of SO2 emissions on labor employment through employing the instrumental variable method and the difference-in-differences method. The results show that: （1）1% increase in SO2 emissions is associated with a decrease of 0.3345% in labor employment on average; （2）SO2 emissions significantly decrease the labor employment in secondary and tertiary industries, but increase labor employment in primary industry; （3）The inhibition effect of SO2 emissions on employment is more significant in sub samples of high economic development and high human capital; （4）The emission reduction effect of the environmental protection accountability system has the characteristics of " cyclical fluctuation”, that is, the short-term effect is obvious, while the long-term effect is disappearing. In terms of the economic cost, the annual employment loss caused by SO2 emissions exceeds 2.5 million people, and the average annual economic loss is about 54 billion Yuan. More importantly, the economic cost is rising year by year. Compared with the existing literature, the marginal contributions of this paper mainly reflect in the following aspects: （1）This paper focuses on and addresses the endogeneity of environmental pollution indicators. In line with the ideas of Chen, et al.（2018）, it uses the exogenous changes of SO2 emission between TCZ cities and non-TCZ cities caused by the policy of the environmental protection accountability system in late 2005. Taking this as a breakthrough point, we further observe the impact of the exogenous changes on labor employment.（2）This paper provides evidence for the effect of environmental pollution on labor employment in developing countries, especially enriches the existing research in China. In general, the existing literature about the effects of environmental pollution on physical health, individual productivity and labor supply mostly focuses on developed countries. Although there are also studies on developing countries, such as Bangladesh, Mexico and Peru, the relevant studies are relatively scarce. Considering the differences in environmental risks and medical conditions among countries, and the fact that 92% of pollution-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, the empirical conclusions of developed countries are not necessarily suitable for developing countries, which further highlights the need to seek evidence from developing countries.（3）This paper estimates the economic and social cost of environmental pollution, which has strong practical significance. Accurate identification of the social welfare effect of environmental pollution is crucial to the design of the optimal environmental policy. Too high or too low estimation will lead to too strict or too loose environmental policy intensity, which is not conducive to economic development. In view of this, this paper provides new evidence for the cost-benefit assessment of the environmental policy from the perspective of labor employment, and provides reference for the central government to make decisions on the strength of the environmental policy.
The Effect of Environmental Pollution on Labor Employment：Evidence from the Policy of Environmental Protection Accountability System
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 45, Issue 06, pp. 42 - 56 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.06.004
 Chen S, Chen T. Air pollution and public health: Evidence from sulfur dioxide emission of coal-fired power stations in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, (8): 158-169. (in Chinese)
 Han C, Sang R. Enterprises’ product switching and product quality improvement under environmental regulation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (8): 43-62. (in Chinese)
 Li J. The impact of air pollution on effective labor supply: Empirical research from China[J]. China Economic Studies, 2014, (5): 67-77. (in Chinese)
 Liu G. The effects of financial structure on urban-rural income gap: Viewed through economic growth and urbanization[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2017, (6): 98-114. (in Chinese)
 Liu S, Zhou S, Hu A. Compulsory education law and economic return to education in urban China: Based on regression discontinuity design[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, (2): 154-167. (in Chinese)
 Mei C, Liu Z. Administrative accountability and bandwagoning in policy implementation: Regional variations in energy saving policy implementation, 2006-2009[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, (12): 127-134. (in Chinese)
 Qi Y, Lu H, Du Y. Research progress on environmental health economics[J]. Economics Information, 2014, (3): 124-137. (in Chinese)
 Qi Y, Lu H. Environmental quality, healthy human capital and economic growth[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2015, (6): 124-135. (in Chinese)
 Shen K. Jin G, Fang X. Does environmental regulation cause pollution to transfer nearby? [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, (5): 44-59. (in Chinese)
 Wei X, Lin T, Zhang N, et al. The pain that people cannot breathe: Effects of air pollution on individual productivity-Micro evidence from Chinese professional soccer players[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2017, (7): 4-19. (in Chinese)
 Xiao T. Whether the environmental quality is the leading factor of labor mobility? [J]. Economic Review, 2016, (2): 3-17. (in Chinese)
 Yang J, Sheng P. The Impact of Pollution on Labor Productivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2012, (5): 56-65. (in Chinese)
 Yuan K, Li H. Emission reduction strategies under plight collusion: Based on the industrial waste gas perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, (1): 134-141. (in Chinese)
 Zheng S, Zhang X, Song Z, et al. Effects of air pollution on outdoor activities of urban Residents: Evidence from the Data of Outdoor Dining on Comment Net[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2016, (1): 89-96. (in Chinese)
 Aragón F M, Miranda J J, Oliva P. Particulate matter and mabor supply: The role of caregiving and non-linearities[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2017, 86: 295-309.
 Cai X, Lu Y, Wu M, et al. Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 123: 73-85.
 Carson R T, Koundouri P, Nauges C. Arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh: A household habor market approach[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2010, 93(2): 407-414.
 Chang T, Graff Zivin J, Gross T, Neidell M. Particulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2016, 8(3): 141-69.
 Chen S, Oliva P, Zhang P. The effect of air pollution on migration: Evidence from China[R]. NBER Working Paper, 2017.
 Chen Y, Ebenstein A, Greenstone M, Li H. Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(32): 12936-12941.
 Chen Y J, Li P, Lu Y. Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: Evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2018, 133: 84-101.
 Currie J, Davis L, Greenstone M, Walker R. Environmental health risks and housing values: Evidence from 1600 toxic plant openings and closings[J]. American Economic Review, 2015, 105(2): 678-709.
 Ghanem D, Zhang J. ‘Effortless perfection’: Do Chinese cities manipulate air pollution data?[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2014, 68(2): 203-225.
 Ebenstein A, Fan M, Greenstone M, He G, Zhou M. New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy [J]. 2017, 114(9): 10384-10389.
 Hanna R, Oliva P. The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City. Journal of Public Economics, 2015, 122: 68-79.
 He G, Fan M, Zhou M. The effect of air pollution on mortality in China: Evidence from the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2016, 79: 18-39.
 He Q. Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: evidence from Chinese panel data[J]. China Economic Review, 2015, 36: 86-100.
 Gehrsitz M. The effect of low emission zones on air pollution and infant health[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2017, 83: 121-144.
 Isen A, Rossin-Slater M, Walker W R. Every breath you take—every dollar you’ll make: The long-term consequences of the Clean Air Act of 1970[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2017, 125(3): 848-902.
 Lichter A, Pestel N, Sommer E. Productivity effects of air pollution: Evidence from professional soccer[J]. Labour Economics, 2017, 48: 54-66.
 Lin F. Trade Openness and air pollution: City-level empirical evidence from China[J]. China Economic Review, 2017, 45: 78-88.
 Schlenker W, Walker W R. Airports, air pollution, and contemporaneous health[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2016, 83(2): 768-809.
 Zivin J G, Neidell M. The impact of pollution on worker productivity[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(7): 3652-73.
 Zivin J G, Neidell M. Environment, health, and human capital[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2013, 51(3): 689-730.
 Zivin J G, Neidell M. Air pollution's hidden impacts[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6371): 39-40.
Cite this article
Zhang Hua. The Effect of Environmental Pollution on Labor Employment：Evidence from the Policy of Environmental Protection Accountability System[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 45(6): 42-56.
Previous: The Mechanism of Introducing Community Currency to Mutual Pension Time Savings：Financial Innovation to Deal with Population Aging