Prior research shows that when making investment decisions, mutual fund managers are concerned about accounting information and accordingly adopt different investment strategies. However, existing literature mainly focuses on accounting earnings itself while paying less attention to earning quality and ignoring that the usage of earning quality can be influenced by market conditions. Hence, most papers find that mutual fund managers do not extensively use earning quality. When market conditions are becoming worse, the overall risks faced by mutual funds increase with the rising systematic risks. In order to decrease the risks, mutual fund managers have strong incentives to allocate more assets to stocks with high earnings quality. As the stock with high earnings quality is less sensitive to systematic risks with its price more stable and performance better than others, it becomes an ideal choice for mutual fund managers to avoid potential risks. Considering the potential effect of market conditions on mutual funds’ use of accounting information, this paper investigates mutual funds’ asset allocation strategy based on earnings quality under different market conditions. Our sample consists of open-ended mutual funds from 2005 to 2015 in China. We find new evidence different from existing literature that when market conditions are poor, mutual funds will invest more high earnings quality stocks. This finding is conducive to explain the mixed conclusions drawn from existing literature concerning whether mutual funds use information of accounting earnings quality when making investment decisions. This paper further explores the channel through which mutual fund managers shift their portfolios toward stocks with higher earnings quality. We find that mutual funds also hold more non-cyclical industry stocks which have high earnings quality. Mutual funds’ transferring portfolio assets between stocks of cyclical and non-cyclical industries are still based on their earnings quality. Uncovering the flight to quality (FTQ) channel from the perspective of relationships between the industry cycle and earnings quality is one of our contributions. Does FTQ have a positive effect on the mutual fund performance? The answer to this question is of great significance to systematically evaluate the investment ability of mutual fund managers and the value relevance of accounting information in investment decisions. We find that the flight to the quality behavior of mutual funds has a positive impact on performance, especially when market conditions are poor. It indicates that some fund managers have good stock selection abilities, and are able to avoid risks by making full use of earnings information and timely adjusting portfolios. Our findings shed light on understanding the role of accounting information quality in investment decisions. We show new evidence contributing to relevant literature that when market conditions are poor, mutual funds will invest more high earnings quality stocks. We also find that the flight to the quality behavior of mutual funds has a positive impact on mutual funds’ performance. This finding will help investors make a better understanding of how mutual fund managers use accounting information to make investment decisions professionally and more comprehensively evaluate the investment abilities of mutual fund managers.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Market Conditions and the Fund Behavior of Flight to Quality:A Study Based on Earnings Quality
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 11, pp. 4 - 17 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.11.001
Summary
References
Summary
Keywords
[1]Cai Q F, Liu J. Performance ranking, market status and risk adjustment behavior of fund managers: Competing for name or seeking profit?[J]. Financial Review, 2012, (3): 66-76. (In Chinese)
[2]Chen D, Kong M Q, Wang H J. Give me peaches and give them back: Business cycle and state-owned enterprise tax avoidance[J]. Managing the World, 2016, (5): 46-63. (In Chinese)
[3]Chen W C. Economic cycle, industry cycle and earnings management degree: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies[J]. Nankai Management Review, 2013, (3): 26-35. (In Chinese)
[4]Gu L, Liu C B. Relations between Chinese stock market and macroeconomic fundamentals[J]. Mathematical Statistics and Management, 2001, (3): 41-45.(In Chinese)
[5]Huang H J, Ding W. Spectral analysis of the interaction between stock market and economic cycle[J]. Industrial Economic Research, 2009, (6): 65-72.(In Chinese)
[6]Wang Q W. The impact of accounting earnings quality on future accounting earnings and stock returns: An empirical study based on China’s stock market[J]. Financial Research, 2005, (10): 141-152. (In Chinese)
[7]Wu N. Dynamic collaborative selection of economic cycle, Financing constraints and working capital[J]. Accounting Research, 2013, (8): 54-61. (In Chinese)
[8]Yao Y, Liu Z Y, Xiang E W. Does China fund pursue value in investment?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2011, (12): 45-58. (In Chinese)
[9]Zhang Z X, Zhu W H. Empirical analysis of systematic risk structure in Chinese securities market[J]. Economic Theory and Economic Management, 2005, (12): 32-37. (In Chinese)
[10]Ainsworth A B, Fong K, Gallagher D R. Style drift and portfolio management for active Australian equity funds[J]. Australian Journal of Management, 2008, 32(3): 387-418. DOI:10.1177/031289620803200302
[11]Ali A, Chen X J, Yao T, et al. Do mutual funds profit from the accruals anomaly?[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2008, 46(1): 1-26. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00263.x
[12]Barberis N, Huang M, Santos T. Prospect theory and asset prices[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116(1): 1-53. DOI:10.1162/003355301556310
[13]Bhattacharya N, Ecker F, Olsson P M, et al. Direct and mediated associations among earnings quality, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity[J]. The Accounting Review, 2012, 87(2): 449-482. DOI:10.2308/accr-10200
[14]Brunnermeier M K, Pedersen L H. Market liquidity and funding liquidity[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(6): 2201-2238. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhn098
[15]Capocci D, Corhay A, Hübner G. Hedge fund performance and persistence in bull and bear markets[J]. The European Journal of Finance, 2005, 11(5): 361-392. DOI:10.1080/1351847042000286676
[16]Carhart M M. On persistence in mutual fund performance[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(1): 57-82.
[17]Chalmers J, Kaul A, Phillips B. The wisdom of crowds: Mutual fund investors’ aggregate asset allocation decisions[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, 37(9): 3318-3333.
[18]Chen F, Hope O K, Li Q Y, et al. Flight to quality in international markets: Investors’ demand for financial reporting quality during political uncertainty events[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2018, 35(1): 117-155. DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12355
[19]Chevalier J, Ellison G. Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, 105(6): 1167-1200. DOI:10.1086/516389
[20]Dechow P, Ge W L, Schrand C. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2010, 50(2-3): 344-401. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
[21]Fama E F, French K R. The cross-section of expected stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 1992, 47(2): 427-465. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
[22]Francis J, LaFond R, Olsson P, et al. The market pricing of accruals quality[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 39(2): 295-327. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
[23]Gallagher D R, Gardner P A, Schmidt C H, et al. Portfolio quality and mutual fund performance[J]. International Review of Finance, 2014, 14(4): 485-521. DOI:10.1111/irfi.2014.14.issue-4
[24]Gray P, Koh P S, Tong Y H. Accruals quality, information risk and cost of capital: Evidence from Australia[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2009, 36(1-2): 51-72.
[25]Hilary G. Accounting quality and catastrophic market events[R]. Working Paper, 2008.
[26]Huang J, Sialm C, Zhang H J. Risk shifting and mutual fund performance[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2011, 24(8): 2575-2616. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhr001
[27]Jin Q L. Business cycle, accounting behavior and earnings management[D]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2005.
[28]Jones J J. Earnings management during import relief investigations[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1991, 29(2): 193-228. DOI:10.2307/2491047
[29]Kao G W, Cheng L T W, Chan K C. International mutual fund selectivity and market timing during up and down market conditions[J]. Financial Review, 1998, 33(2): 127-144. DOI:10.1111/fire.1998.33.issue-2
[30]Kempf A, Ruenzi S, Thiele T. Employment risk, compensation incentives, and managerial risk taking: Evidence from the mutual fund industry[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 92(1): 92-108. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.05.001
[31]Lambert R, Leuz C, Verrecchia R E. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2007, 45(2): 385-420. DOI:10.1111/joar.2007.45.issue-2
[32]McKay P A. Investors pay more attention to profit ‘purity’[N]. The Wall Street Journal, June 26, 2006, (C1).
[33]Ng J. The effect of information quality on liquidity risk[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2011, 52(2-3): 126-143. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.03.004
[34]Penman S H. Financial statement analysis and security valuation[M]. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
[35]Sloan R G. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?[J]. The Accounting Review, 1996, 71(3): 289–315.
[36]Vayanos D. Flight to quality, flight to liquidity, and the pricing of risk[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.
Cite this article
Peng Wenping, Xiao Jihui, Zhou Yujuan. Market Conditions and the Fund Behavior of Flight to Quality:A Study Based on Earnings Quality[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(11): 4-17.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES