8420 
5100文章考虑了我国非正规就业普遍存在的现实，构建包含非正规就业的动态随机一般均衡模型，分析我国劳动力市场结构性改革的短期效应和长期效应。研究发现，不同劳动力市场结构性改革的短期效应与长期效应存在显著差异：（1）就长期效应而言，以降低正规部门雇佣成本为内容的第一种劳动力市场结构性改革、以降低正规部门议价能力为内容的第二种劳动力市场结构性改革均有助于产出的增加以及就业的正规化（即长期收益）；（2）就短期效应而言，第一种劳动力市场结构性改革在短期中引起产出的显著下降和失业的显著上升（即短期疼痛），而第二种劳动力市场结构性改革则并未引起失业的增加。进一步，文章发现货币政策对劳动力市场结构性改革的效应具有重要影响：就基准政策看，旨在降低雇佣成本的第一种劳动力市场结构性改革的效应具有显著的"以短期疼痛换取长期收益"的特征；在Evans规则下，第一种劳动力市场结构性改革的这一特征则不复存在。因此，无论采用哪一种改革方式，Evans规则均可以作为配套性货币政策；并且就改革的效果而言，第二种劳动力市场结构性改革可能更为可取。
劳动力市场结构性改革的宏观经济效应:一个模拟分析
摘要
参考文献
摘要
关键词
8 沈晓栋.中国非正规部门规模估算与宏观效应量化分析[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2015.
11 吴要武.中国城镇非正规就业问题研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2014.
13 中国经济增长前沿课题组.突破经济增长减速的新要素供给理论、体制与政策选择[J].经济研究, 2015, (11):4-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2015.11.001
14 Batini N, Kim Y, Levine P, et al.Informal labour and credit markets:A survey[R].IMF Working Paper, 2010.
16 Cacciatore M, Duval R, Fioro G, et al.Short-term pain for long-term gain:Market deregulation and monetary policy in small open economies[R].NBER Working Paper No.w21784, 2015.
17 Cacciatore M, Fioro G.The macroeconomic effects of markets deregulation[J].International Finance, 2015, 183(3):343-360.
18 Cacciatore M, Fioro G. The macroeconomic effects of goods and labor markets deregulation[J].Review of Economic Dynamics, 2016, 20:1-24. DOI:10.1016/j.red.2015.10.002
19 Campolmi A, Faia E.Labour market institution and inflation volatility in the Euro area[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2011, 35(5):793-812. DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2010.07.001
20 Charlot O, Malherbet F, Terra C.Informality in developing economies:Regulation and fiscal policies[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2015, 51:1-27. DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2014.09.031
21 Chen K, Higgins P, Waggoner D F.China pro-growth monetary policy and its asymmetric transmission[R].NBER Working Paper No.w22650, 2016.
22 Christiano L, Eichenbaum M, Trabandt M.Unemployment and business cycle[J].Econometrics, 2016, 84(4):1523-1569. DOI:10.3982/ECTA11776
23 Davis S, Haltiwanger J.Labor market fluidity and economic performance[R].NBER Working Papers No.w20479, 2014.
24 Evans C.The Fed's dual mandate responsibilities and challenges facing U.S. monetary policy[R].Federal Reserve of Chicago Working Paper No.r111019c, 2011.
25 Faia E, Wolfgang L, Cristian M. Labor selection, turnover cost and optimal monetary policy[J].Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2014, 46(1):115-144. DOI:10.1111/jmcb.2014.46.issue-1
26 Fiess N, Fugazza M, Maloney W.Informal self-employment and macroeconomic fluctuations[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2010, 91(2):211-226. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.09.009
27 Gali J.Insider-outsider labor markets, hysteresis and monetary policy[R].UPF Department of Economic Working Paper No.1506, 2016.
28 Gertler M, Huckfeldt C, Trigari A.Unemployment fluctuations, match quality, and the wage cyclicality of new hires[R].NBER Working Paper No.w22341, 2016, .
29 La Porta R, Shleifer A.Informality and development[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, 28(3):109-126. DOI:10.1257/jep.28.3.109
引用本文
陈利锋. 劳动力市场结构性改革的宏观经济效应:一个模拟分析[J]. 财经研究, 2017, 43(10): 4–17.
导出参考文献，格式为：
