This paper takes 144 cities in the eastern and central China that can be largely radiated by feudal dynasty culture as the research object, and finds that the difference between rich and poor cities is closely related to the spatial distribution of ancient capitals. Based on the traceability and exploration of the historical factors about institution and culture, we establish the theoretical hypothesis of “distance from ancient capitals—marketization—urban economic growth”, that is, “distance from ancient capitals” determines the degree of the influence of feudal dynasty culture on cities outside the capital, and the feudal dynasty’s system-culture radiation which is dominated by Confucian culture decay with the increase of “distance from ancient capitals”, which leads to differences in the institutional-cultural factors that hinder the marketization of cities. Due to cultural heritage and the path dependence of institutional change, these historical institution-culture factors have potentially affected the marketization and economic growth of cities from 1978 to now. The empirical research uses the “distance from ancient capitals” as a historical tool variable of marketization, estimates the contribution of the marketization process to urban economic growth, and overcomes the problem of estimation bias due to endogenity. The 2SLS estimation results show that the marketization of cities has a significantly positive effect on per capita GDP. The marketization has increased by 1%, and the per capita GDP has increased by about 0.360%. When we add the control variables, or change the calculation methods of variables, empirical conclusions are very robust. Based on the research conclusions, this paper further quantitatively discusses the impact of marketization on per capita GDP: The marketization explains 62.051% of the difference of per capita GDP between Changde and Fuyang, 51.997% of the difference of per capita GDP between Changde and Dongying, and 53.139% of the difference of per capita GDP between Fuyang and Dongying. In addition, this paper uses the method of counterfactual fact which is used in the paper of Acemoglu, et al. （2015） to estimate the space for increasing the level of economic growth through accelerating marketization. If the marketization of all cities, which is less than that of Changde, would be promoted to the level of Changde, the per capita GDP of cities （144） will increase by 9.674% from the actual level. If the marketization of all cities would be promoted to the level of Dongying, the average per capita GDP of all cities will increase by 46.461%. This paper theoretically and empirically answers the question that “near the ancient capital” is historical wealth or historical burden, that is to say, the closer the comprehensive distance from the five ancient capitals is, the greater the blocking force of marketization in the system and culture is, which becomes the “historical burden” that affects the marketization process and economic development of these cities.
Is “Near the Ancient Capital” Historical Wealth or Historical Burden?
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 46, Issue 02, pp. 129 - 141 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.02.009
Cai X P, Fang Z Y. The Nanjing earthquake and the capital of Ming Dynasty[J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2011, (4): 146-151. (In Chinese)
Romer D. Advanced macroeconomics[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press, 2009. (In Chinese)
Dong Z Q, Wei X H, Tang C Q. Institutional soft environment and economic development: An empirical study based on the business environment of 30 large cities[J]. Management World, 2012, (4): 11-20. (In Chinese)
Fan G, Wang X L, Zhang L W. Report on the marketization in various regions of China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2001, (7): 3-11. (In Chinese)
Fan G, Wang X L, Ma G R. Contribution of marketization to China’s economic growth[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2011, (2): 4-14. (In Chinese)
Fang Y, Zhao Y. Looking for instruments for institutions: Estimating the impact of property rights protection on Chinese economic performance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2011, (5): 138-148. (In Chinese)
Gao B. Culture, cultural capital and entrepreneurship: An analysis based on regional differences[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2007, (5): 38-48. (In Chinese)
Gong P H, Yu W. Comprehensively deepening reform resistance and response[J]. Social Sciences in Ningxia, 2018, (1): 53-55. (In Chinese)
Guo W. Institutional perspective of Confucian culture and entrepreneurship[J]. Jianghan Tribune, 2002, (10): 22-27. (In Chinese)
Hu M Z. Confucian ethics and market society[J]. Jianghan Tribune, 2013, (2): 50-52. (In Chinese)
Lu H M. Research on the Feng Shui factors of Jiankang in the six Dynasties[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2002, (4): 42-45. (In Chinese)
Lv C F, Zhu D D. How does marketization affect long term economic growth? Analysis from the perspective of market potential[J]. Management World, 2016, (2): 32-35. (In Chinese)
Weber M. Religion in China: Confucianism and Taoism[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 2003. (In Chinese)
Ma Q. Opinions on the capital settlement and the capital move in the Tang and Song Dynasties[J]. The Journal of Humanities, 2009, (1): 137-143. (In Chinese)
Ruan J Q, Wang L. Language difference and the development of market institution[J]. Management World, 2017, (4): 80-90. (In Chinese)
Shao C L. Chinese-style decentralization, marketization process and economic growth[J]. Statistical Research, 2016, (3): 63-71. (In Chinese)
Shi Z K, Wang M C. Marketization and economic growth in China: Based on a Bayesian model averaging approach[J]. Economic Review, 2016, (1): 26-38. (In Chinese)
Song Z M. The compatibility of Confucianism and market economy: The new perspective of modern neo-Confucians[J]. Qilu Journal, 2012, (4): 5-9. (In Chinese)
Sun X H, Li M S, Wang Y. Marketization process and regional economic development differences[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2015, (6): 39-55. (In Chinese)
Tao Y T. The essence and connotation of Chinese road from special economic zones perspective[J]. Social Science Front, 2018, (6): 22-28. (In Chinese)
Tian G Q. The 18th National Congress of the CPC and the future of China’s reform[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, (3): 14-17. (In Chinese)
Wang W J, Fan H J. Empirical analysis of Chinese marketization contribution to economy growth[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2007, (9): 48-54. (In Chinese)
Wei S. Creative transformation from traditional Qilu farming culture to modern commercial spirit[J]. Dong Yue Tribune, 2004, (6): 5-12. (In Chinese)
Wei Q, Wang A, Wang J. The rise of China’s coastal areas: Power of market[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, (8): 170-183. (In Chinese)
Zhang H R. Sunlight space constraint, population density and urban growth in China[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2018, (1): 334-354. (In Chinese)
Zhang J G. The Confucian ethics, market ethics and universal ethics[J]. Philosophical Research, 2000, (2): 35-42. (In Chinese)
Zhu S G. Ancient capital culture and modern urban civilization[J]. Jianghan Tribune, 2004, (8): 91-93. (In Chinese)
Acemoglu D, Jimeno C G, Robinson J A. State capacity and economic development: A network approach[J]. The American Economic Review, 2015, 105(8): 2364-2409.
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J A. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation[J]. The American Economic Review, 2001, 91(5): 1369-1401.
Elisabetta F, Raiser M, Sanfey P. Defying the odds: Initial conditions, reforms and growth in the first decade of transition[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2002, 30(2): 229-250.
Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L. Does culture affect economic outcomes?[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20(2): 23-48.
Havrylyshyn O, Rooden V R, Izvorski I. Recovery and growth in transition economies: A stylized regression analysis[R]. IMF Working Paper,1998.
Hsieh C, Klenow P J. Development accounting[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010, 2(1): 207-223.
Li R Y, Ma Z Y, Chen X R. Historical market genes, marketization and economic growth in China[J]. Economic Modelling, 2019.
de Melo M, Denizer C, Gelb A. Circumstance and choice: The role of initial conditions and policies in transition economics[J]. The Word Bank Economic Review, 2001, 15(1): 1-31.
Xu C G. The fundamental institutions of china’s reforms and development[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2011, 49(4): 1076-1151.
Cite this article
Ma Zhongxin. Is “Near the Ancient Capital” Historical Wealth or Historical Burden?[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020, 46(2): 129-141.
Previous: Chinese Decentralization System and the Implementation Effect of Industrial Policies: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence