Studies on supply-side structural reform in current academia mostly follow the concept of traditional economics, overlooking the situation of social affluence. These studies discuss the reform based on production, emphasizing especially on the production upgrading of personal consumptions, neglecting the rise in the public products of supply-side structural reform. This paper sets off from current study situations and elaborates that the essence of supply-side reform is a reform of production with the purpose of executing effective production. Even though current studies on supply-side reform have touched upon problems such as background, essence, access, and notification, they have failed to address the fact that production includes many stages and that the production significant in each stage is different, which is a matter academia has not yet paid enough attention to. Therefore, this paper first explains the essence of supply-side reform, that is, production reform comes from the desire to produce, which in turn affects the production logic. Under the instruction of such production logic, the meaning of production between traditional society and an affluent society is not the same. Next, this paper analyzes that the production meaning of an affluent society induces the strong demand of public products, elaborating that during private consumption reform, the provision of public products should be done in advance. Last, this paper analyzes that, even though the provision of public products beforehand is important, it often misleads the government in wrongly interfering with the economy. Therefore, all relationships and priorities of public products should be clarified. This paper explores supply-side structural reform from the perspective of John Kennedy Galbraith’s The Affluent Society, proposing three innovative viewpoints: First, supply-side structural reform should get rid of the concept of " profit production” and change it into the concept of " affluent production”. Second, supply-side structural reform is the enhancement of the greater production. Public products play an important part and special attention should be called for. Third, the provision of public products should be done in advance, but the many relationships should first be clarified, with the prevention of outrageous situations of public products listed as most important. This paper places emphasis on how the strategies of supply-side reform are of great significance to the economic development of our country, therefore, this paper calls for a comprehensive consideration and research on supply-side reform from the perspective of social production. In-depths studies should not only be on poor production, but also on affluent production; not only on the production of private consumptions, but also on the production of public products. By doing so, a successful implementation of the strategies of supply-side reform can then be guaranteed.