董事会权力层级、创新战略与民营企业成长 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 丁宇, 王卫江, 李文胜, 等. 创新型企业文化对企业成长的影响: 战略能力的中介作用——以新疆科技型中小企业为例[J]. 科技与经济, 2015,（2）: 31–35.

2 李长娥, 谢永珍. 区域经济发展水平、女性董事对公司技术创新战略的影响[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2016a,（4）: 120–131.

3 李长娥, 谢永珍. 产品市场竞争、董事会异质性对技术创新的影响——来自民营上市公司的经验证据[J]. 华东经济管理, 2016b,（8）: 115–123.

4 李洪亚. R&D、企业规模与成长关系研究——基于中国制造业企业数据: 2005—2007[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2014,（3）: 98–120.

5 李小青. 董事会认知异质性对企业价值影响研究——基于创新战略中介作用的视角[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2012,（8）: 14–22.

6 毛新述. 高管团队及其权力分布研究: 文献回顾与未来展望[J]. 财务研究, 2016,（2）: 52–60.

7 邵毅平, 王引晟. 董事会资本与企业绩效的实证研究——基于R&D投资的中介效应视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2015,（6）: 66–74.

8 卫旭华, 刘咏梅, 岳柳青. 高管团队权力不平等对企业创新强度的影响——有调节的中介效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015,（3）: 24–33.

9 武立东, 江津, 王凯. 董事会成员地位差异、环境不确定性与企业投资行为[J]. 管理科学, 2016,（2）: 52–65.

10 谢永珍, 张雅萌, 张慧, 等. 董事会正式、非正式结构对董事会会议频率的影响——非正式沟通对董事会行为强度的调节作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015,（4）: 15–28.

11 谢永珍. 公司治理2.0时代: 董事会的挑战与创新[J]. 董事会, 2015,（11）: 40–44.

12 谢永珍. 性别助长、董事会行为强度与财务绩效——非线性中介效应的检验[J]. 兰州学刊, 2016,（4）: 171–181.

13 张会荣, 张玉明. 技术创新、股权结构与中小企业成长[J]. 山东社会科学, 2014,（2）: 114–119.

14 张耀伟, 陈世山, 李维安. 董事会非正式层级的绩效效应及其影响机制研究[J]. 管理科学, 2015,（1）: 1–17.

15 Anderson C, Brown C E. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2010, 30: 55–89. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002

16 Birkinshaw J, Nobel R, Ridderstråle J. Knowledge as acontingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure?[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13（3）: 274–289. DOI:10.1287/orsc.13.3.274.2778

17 Diefenbach T, Sillince J A A. Formal and Informal hierarchy in different types of organization[J]. Organization Studies, 2011, 32（11）: 1515–1537. DOI:10.1177/0170840611421254

18 Finkelstein S, Hambrick D C, CannellaJrA A. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009: 227–254.

19 Finkelstein S, Mooney A C. Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 2003, 17（2）: 101–113. DOI:10.5465/AME.2003.10025204

20 Forbes D P, Milliken F J. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24（3）: 489–505.

21 Groysberg B, Lee L E. Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20（4）: 740–758. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0430

22 Hambrick D C. Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26（2）: 253–275. DOI:10.2307/2392472

23 Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9（2）: 193–206.

24 Hambrick D C. Upper echelons theory: An update[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32（2）: 334–343. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254

25 Harrison D A, Klein K J. What’s the difference?Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32（4）: 1199–1228. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096

26 Hayes A F, Preacher K J. Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010, 45（4）: 627–660. DOI:10.1080/00273171.2010.498290

27 He J Y, Huang Z. Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54（6）: 1119–1139. DOI:10.5465/amj.2009.0824

28 Hendry K, Kiel G C. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives[J]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2004, 12（4）: 500–520. DOI:10.1111/corg.2004.12.issue-4

29 Huse M, Hoskisson R, Zattoni A, et al. New perspectives on board research: Changing the research agenda[J]. Journal of Management & Governance, 2011, 15（1）: 5–28.

30 Magee J C, Galinsky A D. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2008, 2（1）: 351–398. DOI:10.1080/19416520802211628

31 Miller T, Del Carmen Triana M. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46（5）: 755–784. DOI:10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-5

32 Neuberg S L, Newsom J T. Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65（1）: 113–131. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113

33 Pettigrew A M. On studying managerial elites[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13（S2）: 163–182. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266

34 Post C, Byron K. Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58（5）: 1546–1571. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0319

35 Smith A, Houghton S M, Hood J N, et al. Power relationships among top managers: Does top management team power distribution matter for organizational performance?[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59（5）: 622–629. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.012

36 Smith K G, Smith K A, Olian J D, et al. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39（3）: 412–438. DOI:10.2307/2393297