7818 
8406Previous studies have shown that corporate social responsibility（CSR）is a corporate activity that goes beyond legal and economic obligations for the purpose of giving back to society. Modern enterprises that enjoy the reputation of CSR are " good citizens” who are truly responsible for their stakeholders. However, due to the imperfection of current CSR rating system, the hypocrisy in CSR phenomenon has led to the fact that enterprises enjoying the reputation of such CSR cannot accurately reflect that they are " good citizens”. The purpose of this paper is to identify a company working on CSR are sincerely " good citizens”, or just " good actors” who think in one way and behave in another. According to the existing literature, a company implementing CSR is found to be " good citizen” of altruism from the perspectives of earnings management and financial reporting quality. However, in the aspect of tax avoidance, it is found that CSR cannot reflect enterprises’ " moral consciousness” and is a tool to cover up self-interest. Owing to the divergence between CSR image and the actual decision-making behavior in previous studies, none of the existing studies has focused on the perspective of earnings forecasts. Therefore, this paper tries to distinguish between the companies that are " good citizens” and the ones that are " good actors” from a perspective of earnings forecasts. From the perspective of corporate earnings forecasts, this paper studies the anomalies of the divergence between CSR reputation and the behavior. The results show that the companies that fulfill CSR better unexpectedly correspond to a lower probability of announcing their earnings forecasts. It is to say there may be " good actors” who deviate from CSR in China’s corporations. Furthermore, using the enterprise samples that announce their earnings forecasts, we find that CSR plays a significant role in enhancing the accuracy and precision of corporate earnings forecasts. In other words, the companies that both announce the earnings forecasts and have good CSR are the " good citizens” who really devote themselves to the society. The contribution of this paper may lie in the following three aspects. Firstly, it verifies the connection between CSR and corporate earnings forecasts for the first time at home. At present, as we know, only Lee（2017）studied the relationship, and based on this, we further study the relationship between CSR and the probability & accuracy of earnings forecasts, expanding the existing research field to a certain extent. Secondly, CSR motivation is very complex, and so for a company working on CSR, whether it is a sincerely " good citizen”, or just a " good actor” who thinks in one way and behaves in another, has always been a hot topic in the academic debate. Although the CSR reports released by the enterprises are conducive to a reduction in the asymmetry of market information, stakeholders are still skeptical of whether the enterprises are truly responsible for social responsibility. Therefore, the rating based on the CSR reports can only represent the external image of the enterprises. This paper chooses the perspective of corporate earnings forecasts, playing a " filtering role” like a funnel, and screens & further identifies " good citizens” or " good actors” among enterprises with sound CSR image, which has deepened the understanding of the " black box” of corporate social responsibility behavior and has provided new literature support for explaining existing corporate literature on CSR behavior. Thirdly, most of the existing literature examines the relationship between earnings and earnings forecasts in the aspects like corporate finance, but seldom pays attention to non-financial factors. This paper expands the relevant research in this area from the perspective of corporate social responsibility.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
“Good Citizen” or “Good Actor”: A Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior Anomalies——From the Perspective of Corporate Earnings Forecasts
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 05, pp. 97 - 108 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.05.007
Summary
References
Summary
[1]Gao Y Q, Chen Y J, Zhang Y J. “Red Scarf” or “Green Scarf”: Research on the charitable motivation of private enterprises[J]. Management World, 2012, (8): 106-114. (In Chinese)
[2]Huang Y X, Yao Z. Corporate social responsibility report, the impression management and accounting performance[J]. Economic Management Journal, 2016, (1): 105-115. (In Chinese)
[3]Li Z F, Tang X D, Lian Y J. The puzzle of Chinese private enterprises’ corporate social responsibility[J]. Management World, 2016, (9): 136-148. (In Chinese)
[4]Lu J. CPA firm working background of directors and corporate earnings forecast－The evidence from the Chinese capital market[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2016, (5): 101-112. (In Chinese)
[5]Luo M, Song Y L. Is the management earnings forecast of China’s stock market credible?[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2012, (9): 168-180. (In Chinese)
[6]Quan X F, Wu S N, Yin H Y. Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: Self-interest tool or value strategy?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, (11): 49-64. (In Chinese)
[7]Shan L W, Gan L, Zheng T. Corporate donations and economic incentives: An empirical study based on corporate donations following the 5.12 earthquake in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2008, (11): 51-61. (In Chinese)
[8]Song Y, Teng P P, Qin C C. Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Based on the empirical study of Shanghai and Shenzhen stock A-share manufacturing listed companies in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, (5): 187-196. (In Chinese)
[9]Wang H, Xiang X H. Chief executive power, internal compensation dispersion and corporate earnings forecast behavior－Empirical evidence based on China’s stock market[J]. Review of Investment Studies, 2015, (10): 124-141. (In Chinese)
[10]Wang X, Xu Y, Chen L. Is corporate social responsibility information disclosure beneficial to the distinction of the qualities of financial reports[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2014, (5): 133-144. (In Chinese)
[11]Yuan Z C, Yue H, Tan W F. Agency cost, ownership nature and management forecast precision[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2014, (3): 49-61. (In Chinese)
[12]Zhang R, Zhang P. The management earnings forecast incentives in China[J]. China Accounting Review, 2011, (1): 3-20. (In Chinese)
[13]Zhou L J, Wang M P, Yang J. Research on the relationship between financial performance and social responsibility performance of internet－Based on life cycle theory[J]. Review of Investment Studies, 2017, (1): 121-130. (In Chinese)
[14]Zhu S. Corporate social responsibility, market evaluation and informativeness of accounting earnings[J]. Accounting Research, 2011, (11): 27-34. (In Chinese)
[15]Baik B, Farber D B, Lee S. CEO ability and management earnings forecasts[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2011, 28(5): 1645-1668. DOI:10.1111/care.2011.28.issue-5
[16]Campbell L, Gulas C S, Gruca T S. Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1999, 19(4): 375-383. DOI:10.1023/A:1006080417909
[17]Cho S Y, Lee C, Pfeiffer Jr R J. Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2013, 32(1): 71-83. DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005
[18]Fassin Y. The reasons behind non-ethical behaviour in business and entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 60(3): 265-279. DOI:10.1007/s10551-005-0134-3
[19]Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits[A]. Zimmerli W C, Holzinger M, Richter K. Corporate ethics and corporate governance[C]. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.
[20]Garriga E, Melé D. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 53(1-2): 51-71.
[21]Heckman J J. Sample selection bias as a specification error[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(1): 153-161. DOI:10.2307/1912352
[22]Jensen M. Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function[J]. European Financial Management, 2001, 7(3): 297-317. DOI:10.1111/eufm.2001.7.issue-3
[23]Jones T M. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(2): 404-437.
[24]King R, Pownall G, Waymire G. Expectations adjustment via timely management forecasts: Review, synthesis, and suggestions for future research[J]. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1990, 9: 113-144.
[25]Kotchen M, Moon J J. Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility[J]. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2012, 12(1): 1-23.
[26]Lee D. Corporate social responsibility and management forecast accuracy[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 140(2): 353-367. DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2713-2
[27]Lins K V, Servaes H, Tamayo A. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2017, 72(4): 1785-1824. DOI:10.1111/jofi.2017.72.issue-4
[28]Miller P B W, Bahnson P R. Quality financial reporting[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
[29]Minor D, Morgan J. CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere[J]. California Management Review, 2011, 53(3): 40-59. DOI:10.1525/cmr.2011.53.3.40
[30]Waymire G. Earnings volatility and voluntary management forecast disclosure[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1985, 23(1): 268-295. DOI:10.2307/2490919
Cite this article
Liu Bai, Lu Jiarui. “Good Citizen” or “Good Actor”: A Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior Anomalies——From the Perspective of Corporate Earnings Forecasts[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(5): 97-108.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
