税制绿色化与企业ESG表现——基于《环境保护税法》的准自然实验 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 毕茜,于连超. 环境税的企业绿色投资效应研究−基于面板分位数回归的实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2016,(3):76−82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.03.010

2 程博,熊婷,殷俊明. 他山之石或可攻玉:税制绿色化对企业创新的溢出效应[J]. 会计研究,2021,(6):176−188. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2021.06.013

3 邓博夫,王泰玮,吉利. 地区经济增长压力下的政府环境规制与企业环保投资−政府双重目标协调视角[J]. 财务研究,2021,(3):70−81.

4 范子英,赵仁杰. 法治强化能够促进污染治理吗?−来自环保法庭设立的证据[J]. 经济研究,2019,(3):21−37.

5 胡珺,黄楠,沈洪涛. 市场激励型环境规制可以推动企业技术创新吗?−基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J]. 金融研究,2020,(1):171−189.

6 黄世忠. 支撑ESG的三大理论支柱[J]. 财会月刊,2021,(19):3−10.

7 金友良,谷钧仁,曾辉祥. “环保费改税”会影响企业绩效吗?[J]. 会计研究,2020,(5):117−133. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2020.05.009

8 李建军,刘元生. 中国有关环境税费的污染减排效应实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,(8):84−91. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.08.011

9 李青原,章尹赛楠. 金融开放与资源配置效率−来自外资银行进入中国的证据[J]. 中国工业经济,2021,(5):95−113. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2021.05.006

10 黎文靖,彭远怀,谭有超. 知识产权司法保护与企业创新−兼论中国企业创新结构的变迁[J]. 经济研究,2021,(5):144−161. DOI:10.12229/j.issn.1672-5719.2021.05.094

11 李香菊,贺娜. 地区竞争下环境税对企业绿色技术创新的影响研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018,(9):73−81.

12 刘金科,肖翊阳. 中国环境保护税与绿色创新:杠杆效应还是挤出效应?[J]. 经济研究,2022,(1):72−88.

13 刘运国,刘梦宁. 雾霾影响了重污染企业的盈余管理吗?−基于政治成本假说的考察[J]. 会计研究,2015,(3):26−33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2015.03.004

14 龙凤,葛察忠,林菲,等. 环境保护税对企业绩效的影响研究:基于税额标准的提高[J]. 中国环境管理,2021,(5):127−134.

15 沈洪涛,周艳坤. 环境执法监督与企业环境绩效:来自环保约谈的准自然实验证据[J]. 南开管理评论,2017,(6):73−82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.06.008

16 生态环境部规划财务司. 中国排污许可制度改革: 历史、现实和未来[N]. 中国环境报, 2018-09-12（003）.

17 唐国平,李龙会,吴德军. 环境管制、行业属性与企业环保投资[J]. 会计研究,2013,(6):83−89. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2013.06.012

18 田利辉,关欣,李政,等. 环境保护税费改革与企业环保投资−基于《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验[J]. 财经研究,2022,(9):32−46. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20220317.102

19 王珮,杨淑程,黄珊. 环境保护税对企业环境、社会和治理表现的影响研究−基于绿色技术创新的中介效应[J]. 税务研究,2021,(11):50−56. DOI:10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2021.11.010

20 王永萍,茅泷丹,王琦. 环境保护税法对京津冀上市公司创新的影响研究−基于DEA-Malmquist指数分解的分析[J]. 中国软科学,2021,(S1):339−347.

21 徐保昌,谢建国. 排污征费如何影响企业生产率:来自中国制造业企业的证据[J]. 世界经济,2016,(8):143−168.

22 叶金珍,安虎森. 开征环保税能有效治理空气污染吗[J]. 中国工业经济,2017,(5):54−74. DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2017.05.005

23 于连超,孙帆,毕茜,等. 环境保护费改税有助于提升企业产能利用率吗?−来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J]. 上海财经大学学报,2021,(4):32−47.

24 于连超,谢鹏,刘强,等. 环境保护费改税能抑制企业金融化吗−基于《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验[J]. 当代财经,2022,(2):127−137.

25 于连超,张卫国,毕茜. 环境保护费改税促进了重污染企业绿色转型吗?−来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2021,(5):109−118.

26 张彩云. 排污权交易制度能否实现“双重红利”?−一个自然实验分析[J]. 中国软科学,2020,(2):94−107. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2020.02.009

27 赵阳,沈洪涛,刘乾. 中国的边界污染治理−基于环保督查中心试点和微观企业排放的经验证据[J]. 经济研究,2021,(7):113−126.

28 钟腾,罗吉罡,汪昌云. 地方政府人才引进政策促进了区域创新吗?−来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究,2021,(5):135−152.

29 Allport G W. Traits revisited[J]. American Psychologist,1966,21(1): 1−10. DOI:10.1037/h0023295

30 Aouadi A, Marsat S. Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018,151(4): 1027−1047. DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8

31 Avramov D, Cheng S, Lioui A, et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2022,145(2): 642−664. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009

32 Bolton P, Kacperczyk M. Do investors care about carbon risk?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2021,142(2): 517−549. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008

33 Cain M D, McKeon S B. CEO personal risk-taking and corporate policies[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2016,51(1): 139−164. DOI:10.1017/S0022109016000041

34 Cheng Z C, Chen X Y, Wen H W. How does environmental protection tax affect corporate environmental investment? Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(5): 2932. DOI:10.3390/su14052932

35 Clarkson P M, Li Y, Richardson G D. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies[J]. The Accounting Review,2004,79(2): 329−353. DOI:10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.329

36 Coase R H. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica,1937,4(16): 386−405. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

37 Coase R H. The problem of social cost[J]. The Journal of Law and Economics,1960,3(10): 1−44.

38 Daft R L, Sormunen J, Parks D. Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(2): 123−139. DOI:10.1002/smj.4250090204

39 Duque-Grisales E, Aguilera-Caracuel J. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2021,168(2): 315−334. DOI:10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w

40 Epstein S. The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1979,37(7): 1097−1126. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097

41 Flammer C. Corporate green bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2021,142(2): 499−516. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010

42 Gray W B, Shadbegian R J. Environmental regulation and manufacturing productivity at the plant level[R]. Working Paper No.4321, 1993.

43 Han F, Li J M. Assessing impacts and determinants of China’s environmental protection tax on improving air quality at provincial level based on Bayesian statistics[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2020. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111017

44 He Y, Wen C H, He J. The influence of China environmental protection tax law on firm performance: Evidence from stock markets[J]. Applied Economics Letters,2020,27(13): 1044−1047. DOI:10.1080/13504851.2019.1659488

45 Hu X R, Sun Y N, Liu J F, et al. The impact of environmental protection tax on sectoral and spatial distribution of air pollution emissions in China[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2019,14(5). DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ab1965

46 Huang L Y, Lei Z J. How environmental regulation affect corporate green investment: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123560

47 La Ferrara E, Chong A, Duryea S. Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil[J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2012,4(4): 1−31. DOI:10.1257/app.4.4.1

48 Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R. Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2008,30(2): 121−128. DOI:10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4

49 Li X, Deng G Y. Research on the effect of an environmental protection tax policy on haze control in China: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data[J]. Sustainability,2021,14(1): 41. DOI:10.3390/su14010041

50 Liu G Q, Yang Z Q, Zhang F, et al. Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s Environmental Protection Tax Law[J]. Energy Economics,2022. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106000

51 Orsato R J. Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green?[J]. California Management Review,2006,48(2): 127−143. DOI:10.2307/41166341

52 Pástor Ľ, Stambaugh R F, Taylor L A. Sustainable investing in equilibrium[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2021,142(2): 550−571. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011

53 Pedersen L H, Fitzgibbons S, Pomorski L. Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2021,142(2): 572−597. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001

54 Porter M E, Van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4): 97−118. DOI:10.1257/jep.9.4.97

55 Stroebel J, Wurgler J. What do you think about climate finance?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2021,142(2): 487−498. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.08.004

56 Topalova P. Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from India[J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2010,2(4): 1−41. DOI:10.1257/app.2.4.1