4088 
3348为揭示数字化转型驱动下专精特新“小巨人”组织韧性前因条件的组态效应，本文以132家专精特新“小巨人”上市企业为样本，运用自然语言处理法进行文本挖掘，构建了企业数字化转型指数，并采用fsQCA分析了制造过程数字化转型、商业模式数字化转型、非沉淀冗余资源、沉淀性冗余资源、感知能力、适应能力以及创新能力等前因条件对组织韧性的整体作用机制。研究发现：组织韧性提升的本质为多因素的耦合与协同，具有多元化的模式和多条路径。在数字化转型驱动下，专精特新“小巨人”高组织韧性前因组态包括“全面数字化转型—适应能力”双元协同型、“商业模式数字化转型—创新能力”双元协同型和“制造过程数字化转型—资源—能力”三元协同型。数字化转型在“专精特新”企业高组织韧性前因组态中发挥创造机制、增强机制和重塑机制。“专精特新”企业在利用数字化转型提升组织韧性方面呈现一定的聚焦性，且这种聚焦性受企业数字化水平高低影响。本文拓展和丰富了数字化转型驱动下组织韧性提升机制的理论研究，也为进一步优化“专精特新”企业培育提供了对策建议。
数字化转型驱动的专精特新“小巨人”组织韧性前因组态研究——基于上市企业年报文本挖掘的fsQCA分析
摘要
参考文献
1 陈晓红, 李杨扬, 宋丽洁, 等. 数字经济理论体系与研究展望[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(2): 208-224. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.02.014
2 池仁勇, 郑瑞钰, 阮鸿鹏. 企业制造过程与商业模式双重数字化转型研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(1): 172-181. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2022.01.018
3 单宇, 许晖, 周连喜, 等. 数智赋能: 危机情境下组织韧性如何形成?——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 84-104. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.03.007
4 杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法: 研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 180-197. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.03.012
5 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.09.010
7 蒋峦, 凌宇鹏, 张吉昌, 等. 数字化转型如何影响企业韧性?——基于双元创新视角[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(1): 1-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2022.01.001
8 焦豪, 杨季枫, 应瑛. 动态能力研究述评及开展中国情境化研究的建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 191-210. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.05.015
16 马鸿佳, 肖彬, 韩姝婷. 创业领域动态能力研究综述——基于LDA主题模型[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 2022, http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20220624.1508.005.html
17 潘蓉蓉, 罗建强, 杨子超. 冗余资源与吸收能力调节作用下的制造企业服务化与企业价值研究[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(12): 1772-1779. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2021.12.005
20 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.07.010
23 余江, 孟庆时, 张越, 等. 数字创业: 数字化时代创业理论和实践的新趋势[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(10): 1801-1808. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2018.10.010
27 张秀娥, 滕欣宇. 组织韧性内涵、维度及测量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(10): 9-17. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020090049
28 赵宸宇. 数字化发展与服务化转型——来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(2): 149-161. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2021.02.015
29 Barasa E, Mbau R, Gilson L. What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience[J]. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2018, 7(6): 491-503. DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.06
30 Gentry R, Dibrell C, Kim J. Long–term orientation in publicly traded family businesses: Evidence of a dominant logic[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2016, 40(4): 733-757. DOI:10.1111/etap.12140
31 He Z Y, Huang H L, Choi H, et al. Building organizational resilience with digital transformation[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2023, 34(1): 147-171. DOI:10.1108/JOSM-06-2021-0216
32 Ishak A W, Williams E A. A dynamic model of organizational resilience: Adaptive and anchored approaches[J]. Corporate Communications:An International Journal, 2018, 23(2): 180-196. DOI:10.1108/CCIJ-04-2017-0037
33 Li L X, Wang Z Q, Ye F, et al. Digital technology deployment and firm resilience: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, 105: 190-199. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.002
34 Linnenluecke M K. Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2017, 19(1): 4-30. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12076
35 Ma Z Z, Xiao L, Yin J L. Toward a dynamic model of organizational resilience[J]. Nankai Business Review International, 2018, 9(3): 246-263. DOI:10.1108/NBRI-07-2017-0041
36 Makadok R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(5): 387-401. DOI:10.1002/smj.158
37 Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2017, 41(6): 1029-1055. DOI:10.1111/etap.12254
38 Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103773. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
39 Ragin C C. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
40 Richtnér A, Löfsten H. Managing in turbulence: How the capacity for resilience influences creativity[J]. R& D Management, 2014, 44(2): 137-151.
41 Sharfman M P, Wolf G, Chase R B, et al. Antecedents of organizational slack[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13(4): 601-614. DOI:10.2307/258378
42 Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319-1350. DOI:10.1002/smj.640
43 Tognazzo A, Gubitta P, Favaron S D. Does slack always affect resilience? A study of quasi-medium-sized Italian firms[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2016, 28(9-10): 768-790.
44 Vanacker T, Collewaert V, Paeleman I. The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2013, 50(6): 1070-1096. DOI:10.1111/joms.12026
45 Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda[A]. Hinterhuber A, Vescovi T, Checchinato F. Managing digital transformation[M]. London: Routledge, 2021: 13-66.
46 von Briel F, Davidsson P, Recker J. Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018, 42(1): 47-69. DOI:10.1177/1042258717732779
47 Warner K S R, Wäger M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349. DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
48 Wu L Y. Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(1): 27-31. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.007
49 Xie X M, Wu Y H, Palacios-Marqués D, et al. Business networks and organizational resilience capacity in the digital age during COVID-19: A perspective utilizing organizational information processing theory[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 177: 121548. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121548
引用本文
曹钰华, 张延莉, 石蓉荣, 等. 数字化转型驱动的专精特新“小巨人”组织韧性前因组态研究——基于上市企业年报文本挖掘的fsQCA分析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(10): 68-83.
导出参考文献，格式为：
