9400 
2558在创新网络中，企业可以通过松散的合作抑或紧密的联盟伙伴关系有效获取创新所需的异质性知识，但很多企业由于无法区分它们之间的差异进行正确的维护而痛失创新机会，阻碍了企业的创新。论文以资源基础理论和社会网络理论为基础，将个体层面企业间的关系强弱和集体层面网络密度纳入到同一个框架进行研究。研究结果表明，在稠密的网络中，较强和较弱的联盟合作伙伴关系都不利于企业创新，但是联盟惯例能够减轻他们的影响，合适的伙伴关系最利于企业创新；在稀疏的网络中，合作伙伴关系越强，企业的创新绩效越明显，而且联盟惯例也强化了他们之间的关系。研究结论对如何进行合作伙伴关系的选择和维护，有效利用外部资源，推动技术创新，提升企业核心竞争力具有重要的理论和实践意义。
“若即若离”还是“亲密无间”：联盟惯例调节下的伙伴关系和创新绩效
摘要
参考文献
6 刘景东,朱梦妍. 技术创新网络惯例的治理功能及维度构建[J]. 管理科学,2019, 32(3): 106-119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2019.03.009
7 马丽,邵云飞. 二次创新中组织学习平衡与联盟组合网络匹配对技术能力的影响——京东方1993—2018年纵向案例研究[J]. 管理学报,2019, 16(6): 810-820. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.06.003
11 杨博旭,王玉荣,李兴光. “厚此薄彼”还是“雨露均沾”——组织如何有效利用网络嵌入资源提高创新绩效[J]. 南开管理评论,2019, 22(3): 201-213. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2019.03.018
12 Kremser W,Schreyögg G. The dynamics of interrelated routines:Introducing the cluster level[J]. Organization Science,2016, 27(3): 698-721. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2015.1042
13 Kumar P,Zaheer A. Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2019, 62(3): 691-716. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0819
14 Leenders R T A J,Dolfsma W A. Social networks for innovation and new product development[J]. The Journal of Product Innovation Management,2016, 33(2): 123-131. DOI:10.1111/jpim.12292
15 Liang X N,Liu A M M. The evolution of government sponsored collaboration network and its impact on innovation:A bibliometric analysis in the Chinese solar PV sector[J]. Research Policy,2018, 47(7): 1295-1308. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.012
16 Lu Y,Zhou L X,Bruton G,et al. Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2010, 41(3): 419-436. DOI:10.1057/jibs.2009.73
17 Nigam A,Huising R,Golden B. Explaining the selection of routines for change during organizational search[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2016, 61(4): 551-583. DOI:10.1177/0001839216653712
18 Peeters C,Massini S,Lewin A Y. Sources of variation in the efficiency of adopting management innovation:The role of absorptive capacity routines,managerial attention and organizational legitimacy[J]. Organization Studies,2014, 35(9): 1343-1371. DOI:10.1177/0170840614539311
19 Pentland B T,Hærem T,Hillison D. The(N)ever-changing world:Stability and change in organizational routines[J]. Organization Science,2011, 22(6): 1369-1383. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1110.0624
20 Perry-Smith J E,Mannucci P V. From creativity to innovation:The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey[J]. Academy of Management Review,2017, 42(1): 53-79. DOI:10.5465/amr.2014.0462
21 Radziwon A,Bogers M. Open innovation in SMEs:Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2019, 146: 573-587. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021
22 Rhee L,Leonardi P M. Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2018, 39(4): 1188-1215. DOI:10.1002/smj.2755
23 Söderholm P,Hellsmark H,Frishammar J,et al. Technological development for sustainability:The role of network management in the innovation policy mix[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2019, 138: 309-323. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.010
24 Yen Y X,Hung S W. Why do buyers share knowledge with suppliers in new product development? Current and alternative supplier antecedents[J]. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing,2017, 24(4): 283-296. DOI:10.1080/1051712X.2018.1381412
25 Zhang G P,Duan H B,Zhou J H. Network stability,connectivity and innovation output[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017, 114: 339-349. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.004
26 Zhang J M,Jiang H,Wu R,et al. Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing:A network pluralism framework of firms’ R& D alliance network and innovation performance[J]. Journal of Management,2019, 45(7): 2635-2665. DOI:10.1177/0149206318761575
引用本文
刘景东, 周萌, 叶江峰, 等. “若即若离”还是“亲密无间”：联盟惯例调节下的伙伴关系和创新绩效[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(7): 111-125.
导出参考文献，格式为：
