探究生育意愿的影响因素,助力人口转变升级成为当前研究的重要方向。文章置身中国具体情境,基于中国社会状况综合调查数据(
互联网使用与个体生育意愿——基于信息成本和家庭代际视角的分析
摘要
参考文献
摘要
1 陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
6 靳永爱,钱岳,陈卫. 家庭经济地位与生育行为:宏观环境的调节效应[J]. 人口与发展,2015,(2):72−83. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1668.2015.02.010
8 李龙,翟振武. 生育一孩弱化二孩生育意愿吗?−基于北京市“单独”家庭的考察[J]. 南方人口,2014,(5):1−11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1613.2014.05.001
9 李书宁. 互联网信息环境中信息超载问题研究[J]. 情报科学,2005,(10):1587−1590. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7634.2005.10.032
11 吴伟,刘秀光. 互联网市场信息共享与信息不完全的冲突[J]. 吉林工商学院学报,2016,(4):46−50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3288.2016.04.010
14 姚从容,吴帆,李建民. 我国城乡居民生育意愿调查研究综述:2000-2008[J]. 人口学刊,2010,(2):17−22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-129X.2010.02.003
17 张杨波. 代际冲突与合作−幼儿家庭照料类型探析[J]. 学术论坛,2018,(5):125−133. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4434.2018.05.016
18 赵联飞. 互联网鸿沟形成机制的代际差异−“70后”“80后”“90后”互联网参与实证研究[J]. 当代青年研究,2019,(1):109−115. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1789.2019.01.017
22 周晓虹. 文化反哺与媒介影响的代际差异[J]. 江苏行政学院学报,2016,(2):63−70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2016.02.009
24 周裕琼. 数字代沟与文化反哺:对家庭内“静悄悄的革命”的量化考察[J]. 现代传播,2014,(2):117−123. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-8770.2014.02.025
25 Albanesi S,Olivetti C. Gender roles and medical progress[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2016,124(3): 650−695. DOI:10.1086/686035
26 Wajcman J. Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.
27 Barro R J,Becker G S. Fertility choice in a model of economic growth[J]. Econometrica,1989,57(2): 481−501. DOI:10.2307/1912563
28 Francesco C B,Osea G,Luca S. Does broadband Internet affect fertility?[J]. Population Studies,2019,73(3): 297−316. DOI:10.1080/00324728.2019.1584327
29 Edmunds A,Morris A. The problem of information overload in business organisations:A review of the literature[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2000,20(1): 17−28. DOI:10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1
30 Melanie G,Chris M H. Offline effects of online connecting:The impact of broadband diffusion on teen fertility decisions[J]. Journal of Population Economics,2017,30(1): 69−91. DOI:10.1007/s00148-016-0605-0
32 Hargittai E. Digital Na(t)ives?Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”[J]. Sociological Inquiry,2010,80(1): 92−113. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
33 Hargittai E,Piper A M,Morris M R. From internet access to internet skills:Digital inequality among older adults[J]. Universal Access in the Information Society,2019,18(4): 881−890. DOI:10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5
34 Iacobucci D. Mediation analysis and categorical variables:The final frontier[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2012,22(4): 582−594. DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.006
36 Liu D H,Raftery A E. How do education and family planning accelerate fertility decline?[J]. Population and Development Review,2020,46(3): 409−441. DOI:10.1111/padr.12347
37 Te Poel F,Baumgartner S E,Hartmann T,et al. The curious case of cyberchondria:A longitudinal study on the reciprocal relationship between health anxiety and online health information seeking[J]. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,2016,43: 32−40. DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.07.009
39 Zheng Z Z. Reproductive behaviour and determinants in a low-fertility era in China[J]. Asian Population Studies,2019,15(2): 127−130. DOI:10.1080/17441730.2019.1594655
引用本文
王小洁, 聂文洁, 刘鹏程. 互联网使用与个体生育意愿——基于信息成本和家庭代际视角的分析[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(10): 110-124.
导出参考文献,格式为: