基于金融风险防范视角的股份回购适用性研究

A Research on the Applicability of Share Repurchases from the Perspective of Financial Risk Prevention: Evidence from the Margin Trading and Short Selling Market

顾小龙,辛宇

2026 第 52 卷 第 09 期 页码 49-63

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20250107.101

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

文章以股份回购的实施作为准自然实验冲击,通过构建倾向得分匹配双重差分模型,探讨了股份回购经济后果的状态依存现象,为合理、适度运用这一财务工具提供了决策参考。研究发现,在融资融券市场中,股份回购实施完成后,发起回购的公司承受了较大的卖空压力。这一结果在各类因果识别与稳健性检验中均成立。分阶段分析显示,2018年《公司法》修订之后,股份回购引致卖空压力的效应更加明显。异质性分析表明,过度负债、财务困境程度较高以及面临较强融资约束的公司承受的卖空压力更大。文章的研究为我国股份回购的政策制定和企业财务实践提供了有益参考。

The revision of the Company Law in 2018 has spurred the rapid development of share repurchases among A-share listed companies in China. However, existing research, both domestically and internationally, has yet to find evidence that repurchases in China create long-term value for shareholders, instead only demonstrating short-term market reactions. Stimulated by these short-term effects, share repurchases may potentially harm stakeholders by triggering opportunistic behaviors. Therefore, understanding the economic consequences of share repurchases, deciphering their mechanisms, clarifying applicable scenarios, and subsequently employing this financial tool reasonably are of significant theoretical and practical relevance.

This paper examines A-share listed companies included in the margin trading and short selling (MTSS) program from 2010 to 2021, using the period from the repurchase announcement date to the completion date as an interval shock. By constructing a PSM-DID model, it tests the causal relationship between share repurchases and short-selling pressure. The results indicate that: (1) After the completion of repurchases, short-selling pressure on target companies significantly increases compared to the pre-announcement period. This suggests that share repurchases do not necessarily convey “good news”, as traders seek to hedge against future price risks, thereby increasing short-selling pressure. (2) A phased analysis reveals that the market’s short-selling behavior in response to share repurchases primarily emerged after the 2018 revision of the Company Law, indicating that the policy relaxation on repurchases did not fully achieve the goal of preserving market value. Instead, the potential risks of repurchasing companies were captured by forward-looking traders. (3) Heterogeneity analysis at the firm level shows that companies with excessive debt, high financial distress, and significant financing constraints bear greater short-selling pressure after repurchases.

The potential contributions of this paper are as follows: First, it emphasizes that share repurchases, as a financial instrument, do not inherently possess positive or negative attributes; their outcomes vary under diffe- rent conditions. This provides a theoretical basis for the reasonable and moderate use of this tool. Second, it reveals investors’ reactions to share repurchases, offering supplementary empirical evidence on the impact of short-selling mechanisms on pricing efficiency. Third, it addresses market noise caused by technical operations during the repurchase execution period by constructing an interval shock model. Fourth, it characterizes the potential long-term risks in share repurchases from the perspective of MTSS transactions, identifying possible risk spillover effects. This provides insights for policymakers to implement necessary and appropriate regulatory measures following the relaxation of repurchase policies.

参考文献

1 融资融券的治理效应研究——基于公司盈余管理的视角. 会计研究,2014,(9):45-52. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2014.09.006.
2 卖空约束放松与高管超额在职消费. 金融学季刊,2018,(3):28-48.
3 中国式融资融券制度安排与股价崩盘风险的恶化. 经济研究,2016,(5):143-158.
4 卖空的事前威慑、公司治理与企业融资行为——基于融资融券制度的准自然实验检验. 管理世界,2017,(2):120-134.
5 中国式股份回购: 制度变迁、结构特征与类型辨析. 中山大学学报(社会科学版),2022,(1):195-206.
6 股份回购与公司资金成本: 财务风险视角. 南京审计大学学报,2024,(3):50-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8750.2024.03.005.
7 控股股东股权质押与股份回购. 中国软科学,2021,(7):106-119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2021.07.011.
8 上市公司股份回购的内在特质、经济后果与管理反应. 经济与管理研究,2014,(11):55-62. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7636.2014.11.008.
9 放松卖空管制与大股东“掏空”. 经济学(季刊),2017,(3):1143-1172.
10 市场化进程与资本结构动态调整. 管理世界,2011,(3):124-134.
11 放松卖空管制、公司投资决策与期权价值. 经济研究,2015,(10):76-88.
12 卖空与信息披露: 融券准自然实验的证据. 金融研究,2017,(9):130-145.
13 企业战略激进度与融券卖空规模. 中央财经大学学报,2019,(2):74-84.
14 股份回购如何影响股票流动性? . 证券市场导报,2023,(2):51-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1589.2023.2.zqscdb202302005.
15 股份回购宣告前后的上市公司盈余管理行为研究. 上海财经大学学报,2013,(1):82-90.
16 融资融券交易的信息治理效应. 经济研究,2017,(11):150-164.
17 杠杆率、短债长用与企业表现. 经济研究,2019,(7):127-141.
18 谁更过度负债: 国有还是非国有企业? . 经济研究,2015,(12):54-67.
19 会计稳健性抑制卖空了吗? ——基于企业风险和会计稳健性时序特征的分析. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2019,(3):84-94.
20 卖空机制能抑制上市公司违规吗? . 经济研究,2019,(6):89-105.
21 控股股东股权质押: 上市公司股份回购动因. 会计研究,2021,(12):95-106. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2021.12.007.
22 中国式卖空机制与公司创新——基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验. 管理世界,2017,(1):128-144.
23 股价与中国上市公司投资——盈余管理与投资者情绪的交叉研究. 会计研究,2011,(8):30-39. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2011.08.005.
24 “罪魁祸首”还是“替罪羊”? ——中国式融资融券与管理层短视. 经济评论,2019,(1):106-120.
25 控股股东股权质押与上市公司股份回购政策选择. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(4):93-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-511X.2021.04.012.
26 金融生态环境与企业融资约束——基于中国上市公司的实证研究. 会计研究,2014,(5):73-80. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2014.05.009.
27 融资融券对股价特质性波动的影响机理研究: 基于双重差分模型的检验. 管理世界,2014,(8):30-43.
28 股份回购: 半途而废还是有始有终? ——大股东股权质押视角. 会计与经济研究,2023,(1):3-22.
29 市值管理还是价值判断? ——股权质押情境下上市公司股份回购动机研究. 南开经济研究,2023,(1):135-152.
30 会计信息质量低的公司被做空了吗? . 中央财经大学学报,2019,(3):70-84.
31 股份回购新规能更好地保护投资者吗? ——基于股份回购预案市场反应视角. 管理评论,2022,(3):3-18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1952.2022.3.glpl202203001.
32 我国企业债务的结构性问题. 经济研究,2016,(7):102-117.
33 贸易自由化与中国产业升级: 事实与机制. 世界经济,2016,(10):78-102.
34 Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance,1968,23(4):589-609. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x.
35 Leverage, risk of ruin and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance,1967,22(3):395-403.
36 Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics,2021,225(2):200-230. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.
37 The relative signalling power of Dutch-auction and fixed-price self-tender offers and open-market share repurchases. The Journal of Finance,1991,46(4):1243-1271.
38 What do insiders know? Evidence from insider trading around share repurchases and SEOs. Journal of Corporate Finance,2021,66:101544. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101544.
39 Corporate deleveraging and financial flexibility. The Review of Financial Studies,2018,31(8):3122-3174. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhx147.
40 Can managers time the market? Evidence using repurchase price data. Journal of Financial Economics,2015,115(2):261-282. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.007.
41 The long-term consequences of short-term incentives. Journal of Accounting Research,2022,60(3):1007-1046. DOI:10.1111/1475-679X.12410.
42 Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics,2021,225(2):254-277. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.
43 Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics,1995,39(2−3):181-208. DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00826-Z.
44 Financial flexibility and the choice between dividends and stock repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics,2000,57(3):355-384. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00061-1.
45 Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112(1):169-215. DOI:10.1162/003355397555163.
46 Short sellers and financial misconduct. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(5):1879-1913. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01597.x.
47 A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance,1973,28(4):911-922.
48 Short selling pressure, stock price behavior, and management forecast precision: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Accounting Research,2015,53(1):79-117. DOI:10.1111/1475-679X.12068.
49 Are buybacks good for long-term shareholder value? Evidence from buybacks around the world. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2019,54(5):1899-1935. DOI:10.1017/S0022109018000984.
51 The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance,1984,39(3):575-592. DOI:10.2307/2327916.
52 The nature and persistence of buyback anomalies. The Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(4):1693-1745. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhn024.
53 The role of share repurchases for firms’ social and environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics,2023,183(2):401-428. DOI:10.1007/s10551-022-05076-3.
54 Real effects of share repurchases legalization on corporate behaviors. Journal of Financial Economics,2021,140(1):197-219. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.10.008.

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
附录 23.1 KB
数据及程序代码 63.4 MB
图表 432.5 KB