普惠金融如何实现精准扶贫?

How Does Inclusive Finance Achieve Precise Poverty Alleviation?

朱一鸣,王伟

2017 第 43 卷 第 10 期 页码 43-54

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2017.10.004

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

普惠金融对减贫增收究竟有何影响?不同收入阶层的群体能否平等地获益于普惠金融呢?文章采用两阶段最小二乘和工具变量分位数回归方法,利用全国2 018个县域的数据,分层比较了普惠金融发展对不同收入阶层群体减贫增收作用的异质性及促进减贫增收的内在机制。研究表明:普惠金融有利于农村居民增收。但是,普惠金融的减贫增收效应对不同收入阶层的群体存在显著异质性,对贫困县农村居民的减贫增收作用要明显小于非贫困县。贫困地区和贫困人口经济机会的缺乏,内生决定了普惠金融减贫效应的异质性特征。进一步研究发现,经济增长是普惠金融发展促进减贫增收的重要机制,对于贫困县,普惠金融发展的减贫增收作用在很大程度上要归因于经济增长的中介效应。因此,贫困县和非贫困县在推进普惠金融发展时,应实施不同的瞄准机制,避免出现"瞄准性偏误",以提高金融资源配置效率和扶贫的精准性。

How does inclusive finance affect poverty reduction and income growth exactly? Can different income groups benefit from the development of inclusive finance equally? This paper conducts an empirical research based on the data of 2018 counties in China, to study the heterogeneous effects of inclusive finance development on poverty reduction and income growth of different income groups and the internal mechanism via 2SLS model and IVQR model.The results show that the development of inclusive finance is beneficial to the increase in rural residents' income.However, the role of inclusive finance development in poverty reduction and income increase varies with income groups, and the role in poverty reduction and income increase of rural residents in poor counties is significantly smaller than that in non-poor counties.The lack of economic opportunities in poor areas and poor populations endogenously determines the heterogeneity of the poverty reduction effect of inclusive finance.Further studies show that economic growth is an important mechanism of the promotion role of inclusive finance in poverty reduction and income growth.As to poverty counties, the role of inclusive finance in poverty reduction and income growth is largely attributed to the mediating effect of economic growth to a large extent.Therefore, as for the promotion of inclusive finance development, poor and non-poor counties should implement different targeting mechanisms to avoid "targeting bias", and improve the efficiency of financial resources allocation and the precision of poverty alleviation.

参考文献

6 王颖, 曾康霖.论普惠金融:普惠金融的经济伦理本质与史学简析[J].金融研究, 2016, (2):37-54.
15 Alkire S, Foster J. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2011, 95(7-8):476-487. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
16 Baron R M, Kemmy D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
17 Chernozhukov V, Hansen C. Instrumental variable quantile regression:A robust inference approach[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 142(1):379-398. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.06.005
18 Chernozhukov V, Fernández-Val I, kowalski A E. Quantile regression with censoring and endogeneity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 186(1):201-221. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.06.017
19 Greenwood J, Jovanovic B. Financial development, growth and the distribution of income[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(5):1076-1107. DOI:10.1086/261720
20 Mookerjee R, Kalipioni P. Availability of financial services and income inequality:The evidence from many countries[J]. Emerging Markets Review, 2010, 11(4):404-408. DOI:10.1016/j.ememar.2010.07.001
21 Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models[J]. Sociological Methodology, 1982, 13:290-312. DOI:10.2307/270723