2802 
3756在“双碳”目标下，国有企业的低碳价值创造面临兼顾环境效益、社会功能和企业利益的多元价值协同挑战。为此，本文基于“上海地铁”的纵向案例，从资源编排视角出发，探究了国有企业低碳价值创造的动态过程及演化机制。研究发现：（1）动态过程方面，国有企业历经了“萌芽期—成长期—拓展期”三个低碳发展阶段，呈现价值需求叠加、资源编排递进以及价值渐进协同的动态演化特征。具体而言，在政府目标、社会需求和企业利益等低碳价值需求驱动下，国企通过“政策内化型”“示范引领型”“价值共创型”价值创造行动来构建、拓展与重构低碳资源能力，并将其转化为低碳管理重构、低碳技术引领和低碳业务拓展等价值创造载体，逐步撬动社会、环境和经济价值的多元协同。（2）演化机制方面，国家使命对低碳资源编排的驱动和引领、“价值行动↔价值载体”的正向循环，以及价值载体的撬动机制和后效反馈，共同推动了国有企业低碳价值创造的动态演化。本研究基于动态演化视角对国有企业低碳发展研究、低碳价值创造的过程理论以及价值创造的资源编排机制具有一定理论贡献，并为国有企业纾解低碳发展中的多元价值冲突提供了实践启示。
国有企业低碳价值创造的动态演化机制——基于资源编排理论的纵向单案例研究
摘要
参考文献
2 韩超, 陈震, 王震. 节能目标约束下企业污染减排效应的机制研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020, (10): 43-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2020.10.003
4 孔惠丽, 裴潇. 重污染企业绿色转型的价值创造与演化——基于资源编排的案例研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(15): 227-238. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2023.15.027
5 赖晓烜, 陈衍泰, 范彦成. 制造企业数据驱动动态能力的形成与演化[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(1): 113-122. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2023.01.013
6 李富强, 王林辉, 董直庆. 国企治理新模式: 多元目标、相容激励和有效委托理论及实证分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2006, (1): 124-131. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2006.01.018
8 李维安. 做强做大国企: 企业战略还是政策比例要求[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(5): 1. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2016.05.001
9 厉以宁, 朱善利, 罗来军, 等. 低碳发展作为宏观经济目标的理论探讨——基于中国情形[J]. 管理世界, 2017, (6): 1-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2017.06.001
18 许金花, 叶妃三, 商丽霞. 公众环境关注度对企业碳绩效水平的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(6): 865-875.
21 杨忠, 宋孟璐, 徐森. 制度复杂性下的国有领军企业创新链运作机制——基于国家电网的案例分析[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), 2021, 58(6): 84-98.
23 张彩平, 余宁, 尹香香. 碳资产价值创造机制研究——以丰田汽车公司为例[J]. 财会月刊, 2023, 44(16): 106-115.
26 Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, et al. Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2016, 18(2): 180-205. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12068
27 Alexius S, Cisneros Örnberg J. Mission(S) impossible? Configuring values in the governance of state-owned enterprises[J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2015, 28(4-5): 286-306.
28 Andersén J. Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(8): 5506-5520. DOI:10.1002/bse.3433
29 Asiaei K, O’Connor N G, Barani O, et al. Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(1): 369-386. DOI:10.1002/bse.3136
30 Baier K. What is value? An analysis of the concept[A]. Baier K, Rescher N. Values and the future: The impact of technological change on american values[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1966.
31 Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, et al. Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(8): 891-909. DOI:10.1002/smj.2041
32 Chen Q Y, Chen Z, Liu Z K, et al. Regulating conglomerates in China: Evidence from an energy conservation program[R]. Working Paper No. 4047, 2021.
33 Dattée B, Arrègle J L, Barbieri P, et al. The dynamics of organizational autonomy: Oscillations at automobili lamborghini[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2022, 67(3): 721-768. DOI:10.1177/00018392221091850
34 Du K R, Li P Z, Yan Z M. Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 146: 297-303. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.010
35 Freudenreich B, Lüdeke-Freund F, Schaltegger S. A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 166(1): 3-18. DOI:10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
36 Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1): 15-31. DOI:10.1177/1094428112452151
37 Hsu P H, Liang H, Matos P. Leviathan Inc. and corporate environmental engagement[J]. Management Science, 2021, 69(12): 7719-7758.
38 Khan H, Gupta S, Kumar V, et al. Managing climate change risks and creating stakeholders’ value via sustainability-focused B2B brand strategies[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2023, 115: 198-213. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.09.017
39 Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4): 691-710. DOI:10.2307/259349
40 Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, et al. Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(1): 1-13. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.4001
41 Li H Y, Chang Y, Wang X C, et al. Institutional complexity and corporate environmental investments: Evidence from China’s mixed-ownership reform of state-owned enterprises[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2024, 20(5): 716-747. DOI:10.1017/mor.2024.39
42 Lin K J, Lu X Y, Zhang J S, et al. State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2020, 13(1): 31-55. DOI:10.1016/j.cjar.2019.12.001
43 Menguc B, Ozanne L K. Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(4): 430-438. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.002
44 Primc K, Čater T. The influence of organizational life cycle on environmental proactivity and competitive advantage[J]. Organization & Environment, 2016, 29(2): 212-230.
45 Shu C L, Zhao J X, Yao Q, et al. Green innovation and export performance in emerging market firms: A legitimacy-based view[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2024, 20(1): 85-110. DOI:10.1017/mor.2023.40
46 Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 273-292. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
47 Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D, et al. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(5): 1390-1412. DOI:10.1177/0149206310385695
48 Wang R X, Wijen F, Heugens P P M A R. Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(2): 403-428. DOI:10.1002/smj.2714
49 Wei Y H. How should firms orchestrate intrinsic and extrinsic motivational strategies for diverse value-creation outcomes: Synergy or trade-off effect?[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2024, 122: 48-60. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.07.015
50 Yang Z B, Shao S, Yang L L. Unintended consequences of carbon regulation on the performance of soes in China: The role of technical efficiency[J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 94: 105072. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105072
51 Yin R K. Case study research design and methods[M]. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2014.
52 Zeng J, Yang Y L, Lee S H. Resource orchestration and scaling-up of platform-based entrepreneurial firms: The logic of dialectic tuning[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2023, 60(3): 605-638. DOI:10.1111/joms.12854
引用本文
郑琴琴, 林雪颖, 胡雅菡. 国有企业低碳价值创造的动态演化机制——基于资源编排理论的纵向单案例研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(12): 3-23.
导出参考文献，格式为：
