5400 
2056不同的学术创业形式对学术创业者提出了不同的要求，学术创业者适合选择更贴近创业范式的硬创业还是与传统学术文化关联更强的软创业以提高学术创业成功率，成为了值得探索的现实问题。学术创业形式选择受到学术创业者个体差异的影响，而现有研究很少关注个体差异中的主观心理因素，更忽略了多重心理因素的协同效应的影响。本文基于目标动力学理论，采用清晰集定性比较研究方法，分析了影响学术创业形式选择的心理因素组合及其对应的心理目标。研究发现：学术创业者适合硬创业还是软创业受到学术创业动机、创业者身份认同和学术创业压力的共同影响；8个组态揭示了学术创业者拥有主动型、理想型、进取型和成长型的心理目标更适合硬创业；拥有勉强型、清闲型、传统型和生存型的心理目标更适合软创业；主动动机和非创业者身份认同分别是进行硬创业和软创业的重要条件。研究结论有助于推动学术创业的成功实践，同时为学术创业者职业发展和相关组织制定促进政策提供参考依据。
“硬创业”还是“软创业”？——基于多重心理因素的学术创业形式选择组态分析
摘要
参考文献
2 郭峰, 邹波, 李艳霞, 等. 基于社会身份认同的学术创业者身份悖论整合研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2019, 31(2): 34-43. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2019.02.004
6 谢晓佳, 李婷婷, 郑义, 等. 组态视角下科技小院运行绩效研究——基于20个科技小院的定性比较分析[J]. 科技管理研究,2022, 42(3): 41-49. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2022.3.006
9 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报,2019, 16(9): 1312-1323. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.005
11 Abreu M, Grinevich V. The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities[J]. Research Policy,2013, 42(2): 408-422. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
12 Abreu M, Grinevich V. Academic entrepreneurship in the creative arts[J]. Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy,2014, 32(3): 451-470. DOI:10.1068/c11144r
13 Bell R G, Filatotchev I, Aguilera R V. Corporate governance and investors' perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2014, 57(1): 301-320. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0146
14 Cantaragiu R. Towards a conceptual delimitation of academic entrepreneurship[J]. Management & Marketing,2012, 7(4): 683-700.
15 Ding W, Choi E. Divergent paths to commercial science: A comparison of scientists' founding and advising activities[J]. Research Policy,2011, 40(1): 69-80. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.011
16 Fiss P C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32(4): 1180-1198. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
17 Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011, 54(2): 393-420. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
18 Furnari S, Crilly D, Misangyi V F, et al. Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing[J]. Academy of Management Review,2021, 46(4): 778-799. DOI:10.5465/amr.2019.0298
19 Jain S, George G, Maltarich M. Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity[J]. Research Policy,2009, 38(6): 922-935. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
20 Libaers D P. Time allocation decisions of academic scientists and their Impact on technology commercialization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2012, 59(4): 705-716. DOI:10.1109/TEM.2012.2184119
21 Marx A, Dusa A. Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification[J]. Methodological Innovations Online,2011, 6(2): 103-148. DOI:10.4256/mio.2010.0037
22 Mathias B D, Williams D W. The impact of role identities on entrepreneurs’ evaluation and selection of opportunities[J]. Journal of Management,2017, 43(3): 892-918. DOI:10.1177/0149206314544747
23 Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, et al. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations[J]. Research Policy,2013, 42(2): 423-442. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
24 Philpott K, Dooley L, O'Reilly C, et al. The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions[J]. Technovation,2011, 31(4): 161-170. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003
引用本文
韩晴, 黄速建, 肖宇佳, 等. “硬创业”还是“软创业”？——基于多重心理因素的学术创业形式选择组态分析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(1): 137-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
